Skip to main content
Log in

Polyphenol composition of peel and pulp of two Italian fresh fig fruits cultivars (Ficus carica L.)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analytical study was carried out on phenols in two fig cultivars (Ficus carica L.), one black and one green. Fresh fruits were peeled and phenols were extracted separately from the peel and the pulp. The extracts were subjected to HPLC-DAD analysis, by monitoring at four wavelengths, 280, 316, 365 and 520 nm for catechins and benzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonols and anthocyanins, respectively. Results showed that phenols are concentrated almost exclusively in the peel, with the black cultivar having the highest content. In particular, the peel was rich in rutin, with amounts from 527 to 1,071 mg/kg (fresh basis) for green and black figs, respectively. The peel of black figs showed an appreciable content of cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside. The pulp of both green and black cultivars contained only cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside, while the cyanidin 3-O-glucoside was found only in the peel of the black figs. Chlorogenic acid and another cinnamic acid were detected in the peel of both cultivars, while benzoic acids and catechins were not present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hertog MGL, Hollman PCH, Katan MB (1992) J Agric Food Chem 40:2379–2383. doi:10.1021/jf00024a012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo C, Cao G, Sofic E, Prior RL (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45:1787–1796. doi:10.1021/jf960786d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heinonen IM, Meyer AS, Frankel EN (1998) J Agric Food Chem 46:4107–4112. doi:10.1021/jf980181c

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gil MI, Tomás-Barberán FA, Hess-Pierce B, Holcroft DM, Kader AA (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:4581–4589. doi:10.1021/jf000404a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vinson JA, Su X, Zubik L, Bose P (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:5316–5321. doi:10.1021/jf0009293

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ismail A, Marjan ZM, Foong CW (2004) Food Chem 87:581–586. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bao JS, Cai YZ, Sun M, Wang GY, Corke H (2005) J Agric Food Chem 53:2327–2332. doi:10.1021/jf048312z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang MT, Ho CT, Lee CY (1992) ACS Symposium Series 507. Am Chem Soc, Washington DC, p 402

  9. Cook NC, Sammam SC (1996) Nutr Biochem 7:66–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD (1996) Cancer Cause Control 2:325–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Closas R, Gonzalez CA, Agudo A, Riboli E (1999) Cancer Cause Control 10:71–75. doi:10.1023/A:1008867108960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Joseph JA, Shukit-Hale B, Denisova NA, Bielinski D, Martin A, McEwen JJ, Bickford PC (1999) J Neurosci 19:8114–8121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dillard CJ, German JB (2000) J Sci Food Agric 80:1744–1756. doi:10.1002/1097-0010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Prior RL, Cao G (2000) Hort Sci 35:588–592

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vinson JA, Zubik L, Bose P, Sammam N, Proch J (2005) J Am Coll Nutr 1:44–50

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lugasi A, Hóvári J (2002) Acta Aliment Hung 31:63–71. doi:10.1556/AAlim.31.2002.1.9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vinson JA (1999) Cereal Food World 44(2):82–87

    Google Scholar 

  18. Siewek F, Herrnann K, Gritjahn L, Victor W (1985) Z Naturforsch C 40:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  19. Puech AA, Rebeiz CA, Catlin PB, Crane JC (1975) J Food Sci 40:775–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Solomon A, Golubowicz S, Yablowicz Z, Grossoman S, Bergman M, Gottlieb HE, Altman A, Kerem Z, Flaishman MA (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:7717–7723. doi:10.1021/jf060497h

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Donovan JL, Meyer AS, Waterhouse AL (1998) J Agric Food Chem 46:1247–1252. doi:10.1021/jf970831x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakatani N, Kajano S, Kikuzaki H, Sumino K, Katagiri K, Mitani T (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:5512–5516. doi:10.1021/jf000422s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Piga A, Del Caro A, Corda G (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:3675–3681. doi:10.1021/jf021207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chinnici F, Bendini A, Gaiani A, Riponi C (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:4684–4689. doi:10.1021/jf049770a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Piga.

Additional information

Alessandra Del Caro and Antonio Piga contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Del Caro, A., Piga, A. Polyphenol composition of peel and pulp of two Italian fresh fig fruits cultivars (Ficus carica L.). Eur Food Res Technol 226, 715–719 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0581-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0581-4

Keywords

Navigation