Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peer review: how to be a good reviewer

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brown, T.,Peer review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas: Discussion paper from a Working Party on equipping the public with an understanding of peer review, http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk/pdf/ Peer Review. pdf (accessed 23 April 2008), 2004.

Download references

Authors
  1. Martin Caon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caon, M. Peer review: how to be a good reviewer. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 31, xiii–xiv (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178594

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178594

Search

Navigation