Skip to main content
Log in

Radiology physics — where to now…?

  • Guest Editorial
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Round, W.H.,A survey of the Australasian clinical medical physics and biomedical engineering workforce. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 30:13–24, 2007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans, A.L. and James, W.B.,The role of the physicist in a diagnostic radiology department. Clin Radiol, 27:375–377, 1976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gray, Joel E., Barnes, Gary T., Bronskill, Michael J. et al.,The Role of the Clinical Medical Physicist in Diagnostic Radiology. AAPM Report No. 42. In: AAPM, 1994.

  4. Van Epps, E.F.,The role of the radiologic physicist in residency training. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 109:198–200, 1970.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Loon, R.,The role and contribution of a medical physicist in a radiology department. J Belge Radiol; 80:12–16, 1997.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wallace, A.B.,Role of the medical physicist in interventional radiology. Australas Radiol; 43:142–147, 1999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Langer, M.P.,Radiation Risks in Perspective. Am. J. Roentgenol; 189:W52–53, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wall, B.F., Kendall, G.M., Edwards, A.A., Bouffler, S., Muirhead, C.R. and Meara, J.R.,What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation? Br J Radiol; 79:285–294, 2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Redpath, J.L.,Health risks of low photon energy imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 122:528–533, 2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Law, J. and Faulkner, K.,Radiation benefit and risk at the assessment stage of the UK Breast Screening Programme. Br J Radiol; 79:479–482, 2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurwitz, L.M., Yoshizumi, T., Reiman, R.E., et al.Radiation Dose to the Fetus from Body MDCT During Early Gestation. Am. J. Roentgenol; 186:871–876, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clewer, P.R. and Jackson, P.C.,Reporting overexposures and unintended exposures in diagnostic procedures. Br J Radiol; 79:866–869, 2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pettersson, H.B.L., Falth-Magnusson, K., Persliden, J. and Scott, M.,Radiation risk and cost-benefit analysis of a paediatric radiology procedure: results from a national study. Br J Radiol; 78:34–38, 2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levatter, R.E., Brenner, D.J. and Elliston, C.D.,Radiation Risk of Body CT: What to Tell Our Patients and Other Questions* Drs Brenner and Elliston respond. Radiology; 234:968–970, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levatter, R., Brenner, D.J. and Elliston, C.D.,Radiation Risk, Screening, and Standard CT: Further Reply to Brenner and Ellison* Dr Brenner and Mr Elliston respond. Radiology; 237:376–377, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Craig, A.R., Heggie, J.C., McLean, I.D., Coakley, K.S. and Nicoll, J.J.,Recommendations for a mammography quality assurance program. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 24:107–131, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McLean, D., Heggie, J.C., Herley, J., Thomson, F.J. and Grewal, R.K.,Interim recommendations for a digital mammography quality assurance program. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 30:65–100, 2007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cesar, L.J., Schueler, B.A., Zink, F.E., Daly, T.R. and Taubel, J.P., Jorgenson L.L.,Artefacts found in computed radiography. Br J Radiol; 74:195–202, 2001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Korner, M., Weber, C.H., Wirth, S., Pfeifer, K.J., Reiser, M.F. and Treitl, M.,Advances in Digital Radiography: Physical Principles and System Overview. Radiographics; 27:675–686, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krupinski, E.A. and Kallergi, M.,Choosing a Radiology Workstation: Technical and Clinical Considerations. Radiology; 242:671–682, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Samei, E., Seibert, J.A., Willis, C.E., Flynn, M.J., Mah, E. and Junck, K.L.,Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems. Med Phys; 28:361–371, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Victorian Radiation Act (2005). 2005.

  23. Victorian Radiation Regulations (2007 — Proposed). 2007.

  24. ARPANSA, NOHSC.Recommendations for Limiting Exposure to Ionizing Radiation and National Standard for Limiting Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. In:Radiation Protection Series. Melbourne, 1995.

  25. ARPANSA.National Directory for Radiation Protection. In:Radiation Protection Series. Melbourne: ARPANSA, 2004.

  26. ARPANSA.Intervention in Emergency Situations Involving Radiation Exposure. In:Radiation Protection Series. Melbourne, 2004.

  27. ARPANSA.Exposure of Humans to Ionizing Radiation for Research Purposes. In:Radiation Protection Series. Melbourne, 2005.

  28. ARPANSA.Radiation Protection in Dentistry. In:Radiation Protection Series. Melbourne, 2005.

  29. ARPANSA.Radiation Protection in the Medical Applications of Ionizing Radiation — DRAFT Code of Practice. In:Radiation Protection Series. Melbourne, 2007.

  30. ARPANSA.Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology — DRAFT Safety Guide. In:Radiation Protection Series. Melbourne, 2007.

  31. RANZCR.Standards of Practice for Diagnostic Imaging — Version 8.1, Draft 3. In:RANZCR. Sydney, 2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, A. Radiology physics — where to now…?. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 30, xiv–xvii (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178421

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178421

Navigation