Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Repeated exposure and the attractiveness of synthetic speech: An inverted-U relationship

  • Articles
  • Also In This Issue
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous experimental investigation of the effects of repeating an unfamiliar stimulus suggests that mere exposure breeds attraction (e.g., Zajonc, 1968). On the other hand, correlational work with naturally occurring stimuli such as names, music, or landscapes suggests that there is also an overexposure effect: the preference function does rise with familiarity at first but then reaches a turning point and diminishes. The study (N=72) demonstrates this inverted-U relationship in an experimental setting. The stimuli were synthetic nonsense speech, permitting exact control of exposure durations and interstimulus intervals. The critical factors for demonstrating the effect are probably (1) the inclusion of a large number of repetitions, and (2) blocked repetition of each stimulus in a homogeneous sequence not interspersed with other more or less frequent stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berlyne, D.E. (1970). Novelty, complexity and hedonic value.Perception and Psychophysics 8, 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D.E. (1971).Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, G.N. (1968). Children’s “like-dislike” ratings of familiarized and unfamiliarized visual stimuli.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6, 651–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colman, A.M., Sluckin, W., & Hargreaves, D.J. (1981). The effect of familiarity on preferences for surnames.British Journal of Psychology, 72, 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colman, A.M., Walley, M., & Sluckin, W. (1975). Preferences for common words, uncommon words and non-words by children and young adults.British Journal of Psychology, 66, 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Long, M.R., & Saluoso-Deonier, C. (1983). Effect of redundancy on female observers visual responses to clothing.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D.J., Colman, A.M. & Sluckin, W. (1983). The attractiveness of names.Human Relations, 36, 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A.A. (1977). Mere exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M.A., Ross, H.S., & Ames, E.W. (1982). Preferences for familiar or novel toys: Effect of familiarization time in 1-year-olds.Developmental Psychology, 18, 519–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inomata, S. (1983). Research on repeated exposure effects of the stimulus.Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, B.W., & Cervone, J.S. (1978). Affect enhancement in the pseudorecognition task.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 285–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1973).Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, L. (1983). Contact and conflict: The question of integrated education.Irish Journal of Psychology, 6, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S.A., Gottfried, A.W., Melloy-Carminar, P., & Bridger, W.H. (1982). Familiarity and novelty preferences in infant recognition memory: Implications for information processing.Developmental Psychology, 18, 704–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, J.G., Brody, N., & Kauff, D.M. (1983). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. II. Effect of delay between study and test.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 187–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluckin, W., Hargreaves, D.J., & Colman, A.M. (1982). Some experimental studies of familiarity and liking.Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 35, 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.F., & Dorfman, D.D. (1975). The effect of stimulus uncertainty on the relationship between frequency of exposure and liking.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 150–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.E., Aiello, J.R., & Epstein, E.M. (1979). Interpersonal distance preference.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 4, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S.M. (1985). How the familiarity of a landscape affects appreciation of it.Journal of Environmental Management, 21, 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W.R. (1979). Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9 (No. 2, Part 2).

  • Zajonc, R.B., Shaver, P., Tavris, C., & Kreveld, D.V. (1972). Exposure, satiation and stimulus discriminability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 270–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Ulster at Coleraine, BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland

    Stephen M. Williams

Authors
  1. Stephen M. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, S.M. Repeated exposure and the attractiveness of synthetic speech: An inverted-U relationship. Current Psychology 6, 148–154 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686619

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686619

Keywords

Search

Navigation