Abstract
The high prevalence of learning disabilities in the juvenile delinquent population has been well documented, but attempts to remediate and have an impact on recidivism of this population of delinquents has produced limited results. The present study is a replication of the remediation phase of the 1976 LD/JD Project with methodological refinements to control for treatment integrity and strength of treatment. Delinquents in two detention facilities were screened for a developmental reading disorder. Subjects were selected for the study based on normal intelligence, full English proficiency, and a discrepancy of 15 points between reading achievement and IQ. Subjects in the treatment group received 90 minutes of remedial reading instruction per day using a multisensory (Orton/Gillingham) approach. A comparison group received 45 minutes of daily reading instruction in the regular classroom. There was no significant difference between the two groups in mean age of first arrest, mean age, and mean hours of reading instruction. Based on pre- and posttesting in reading and arrest records one year following release, the treatment group made significantly greater growth in reading (.33 year growth vs −.05 year growth per 10 hours of instruction) and had a significantly lower rate of recidivism (41 percent vs 63 percent) than the comparison group. Results were discussed in terms of hours of instruction necessary to improve reading, intervening treatment variables, and cost effectiveness of remedial program.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boder, P. K., Dunivant, N., Smith, E. C., and Sutton, L. P. 1981. Further observations on the link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency.Journal of Educational Psychology 73:838–850.
Campbell, P. B. 1978. The definition and prevalence of learning disabilities. Paper read at the 15th International Conference of the Association for Children with Learning Disabilities, March 1978, Kansas City, MO.
Dunivant, N. 1984. Improving academic skills and preventing delinquency of learning-disabled juvenile delinquents: Evaluation of the ACLD remediation program. National Center for the State Courts, Williamsburg, VA.
Hallahan, D. P., Keller, C. E., and Ball, D. W. 1986. A comparison of prevalence rate variability from state to state for each of the categories of special education.RASE 7:8–14.
Kazdin, A. 1988.Child Psycholotherapy: Developing and identifying effective treatments. New York: Pergamon Press.
Keilitz, I. and Dunivant, N. 1986. The relationship between learning disability and juvenile delinquency: Current state of knowledge.RASE 7:18–26.
Lerner, C. F. 1990. The transtheoretical model of change: self-change in adolescent delinquent behavior. Ph.D. diss., University of Rhode Island, RI.
Prochaska, J. O. and DiClemente, C. C. 1982. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 19:276–288.
Woods, F., Felton, R., Flowers, L., and Naylor, C. 1991. Neurobehavioral definition of dyslexia.In D. Drake and D. Gray (eds.).The Reading Brain. Parkton, Maryland: York Press.
Zimmerman, J., Rich, W., Keilitz, I., and Broder, P. 1981. Some observations on the link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency.Journal of Criminal Justice 9:1–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simpson, S.B., Swanson, J.M. & Kunkel, K. The impact of an intensive multisensory reading program on a population of learning-disabled delinquents. Annals of Dyslexia 42, 54–66 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654938
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654938