Skip to main content
Log in

Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a series of 650 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies, nine bile leaks were identified (1.4%). Patients with bile leaks presented clinically at a mean of 4.9 days (range: 3–8 days) after surgery complaining of diffuse abdominal pain, ileus, and nausea. Laboratory values for complete blood counts and liver function tests were all mildly elevated. Definitive diagnosis was made on the basis of abnormal hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Management strategies included laparotomy and drain placement (n=1), laparoscopy and drain placement (n=3), ERCP and drainage (n=4), and CT-guided percutaneous drainage (n=1). When the etiology of the leakage was identified, it was most commonly either dysfunction of the cystic duct clips (n=3) or leakage from a disrupted duct of Luschka (n=2). The source of the remaining leaks (n=4) was never determined. We conclude that bile leaks are an uncommon cause of morbidity following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagnosis can usually be made with nuclear medicine biliary tract scans and a variety of managements alternatives are successful in treating this complication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 211: 60–62

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gilsdorf JR, Phillips M, McLeod MK, Harness JK, Hoversten GH, Woodbury D, Daley K (1986) Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 151: 259–262

    Google Scholar 

  3. Larson GM, Vitale GC, Casey J, Evans JS, Gilliam G, Heuser L, McGee G, Rao M, Scherm MJ, Voyles CR (1992) Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1983 patients. Am J Surg 163: 221–225

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liquory C, Vitale GC, Lefebre JF, Bonnel D, Cornud F (1991) Endoscopic treatment of postoperative biliary fistulae. Surgery 110: 779–784

    Google Scholar 

  5. McAneny DB, Gibran NS, Braasch JW (1991) Novel approach to iatrogenic bile peritonitis. Surgery 109: 796–798

    Google Scholar 

  6. McQuillan T, Monolas SG, Hayman JA, et al (1989) Surgical significance of the bile duct of Luschka. Br J Surg 76: 696–698

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 213: 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reddick EJ, Olsen DO (1989) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: a comparison with minilap cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 3: 131–133

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324: 1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Linden W, Gedda S, Edlund G (1981) Randomized trial of drainage after cholecystectomy, suction versus static drainage through a main wound versus static drainage through a main would versus a stab incision. Am J Surg 141: 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zucker KA, Bailey RW, Gadacz TR, Imbembo AL (1991) Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 36–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooks, D.C., Becker, J.M., Connors, P.J. et al. Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7, 292–295 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00725942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00725942

Key words

Navigation