Skip to main content
Log in

The curriculum development system in Sweden: Some comments on present trends and problems

Das Curriculum-Entwicklungssystem In Schweden: Einige Kommentare Über Gegenwärtige Tendenzen Und Probleme

Systeme De Developpement Du Programme Scolaire En Suede: Commentaires Sur Les Tendances Et Problemes Actuels

  • The Organization Of Curriculum Reform
  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alkin, M. C. “Accountability Defined”, UCLACSE Evaluation Comment 3, no. 3 (1972), pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M. C. and Johnson, M. “Comments of the Research and Development Program of Byrå L4:1”,Newsletter School Research 1971, no. 24. Stockholm: National Board of Education, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Some Observations on Educational Research and Development in Sweden”,Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 16 (1972), pp. 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, J.,Utbildningsval, utbildningsforskning och utbildningsplanering. Akad. avh. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boalt, G.,Skolutbildning och skolresultat för barn ur olika samhällsgrupper i Stockholm. Akad. avh. Monografier utgivna av Stockholms kommunalförvaltning. Stockholm: P. A. Norstedt, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromsjö, B.,Samhällskunskap som skolämne. Akad. avh. Stockholm: Scandinavian University Books, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervall, L.,New System for Curriculum Development. OECD, 1969. Mimeographed.

  • Dahllöf, U.,Kursplaneundersökningar i matematik och modersmålet. Dissertation 1967 års skolberedning III. SOU 15 (1960). Stockholm: Ecklesiastikdepartementet, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraven på gymnasiet. 1960 års gymnasieutredning II. SOU 1963: 22. Stockholm: Ecklesiastikdepartementet, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Recent Reforms of Secondary Education in Sweden”,Comparative Education 2 (1966), pp. 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoldifferentiering och undervisningsförlopp. Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 2. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ability Grouping, Content Validity and Curriculum Process Analysis. New York: Teachers College Press, 1971a.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Relevance and Fitness Analysis in Comparative Education”,Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 15, no. 3 (1971b), pp. 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahllöf, U. S. and Lundgren, U. P.,Macro and Micro Approaches Combined for Curriculum Process Analysis: A Swedish Educational Field Project. Project Compass 23. Göteborg: Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Göteborg 10, 1970. Mimeographed.

  • Dahllöf, U.; Lundgren, U. P.; and Siöö, M. “Reform Implementation Studies as a Basis for Curriculum Theory: Three Swedish Approaches”,Curriculum Theory Network 7 (1971), pp. 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklund, H. “The Study Day Project”,Newsletter School Research 29 (1971).

  • Härnqvist, K. “Beräkning av reserver för högre utbildning”,I. SOU 1958: 11, pp. 7–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Individuella differenser och skoldifferentiering. 1957 års skolberedning II. SOU 1960: 13. Stockholm: Ecklesiastikdepartementet, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- Härnqvist, K.Social Factors and Educational Choice. Göteborg: Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Göteborg 1965, no. 3. Mimeographed.

  • Härnqvist, K. and Bengtsson, J.,Educational Reform and Educational Equality. Contribution to a reader on Social Stratification ed. by R. Scase, Göteborg: Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Göteborg 1972, no. 20. Mimeographed.

  • Härnqvist, K. and Grahm, Å.,Vägen genom gymnasiet. 1960 års gymnasieutredning I. SOU 1963: 15. Stockholm: Eckleiastikdepartementet, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husén, T.,Begåvning och miljö. Stockhölm: Gebers, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Problems of Differentiation in Swedish Compulsory Schooling. Stockholm: Scandinavian University Books, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husén, T. and Boalt, G.Educational Research and Educational Change. The Case of Sweden. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, and New York: Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husén, T. and Dahllöf, U.,Mathematics and Communication Skills in School and Society. Stockholm: The Industrial Council for Social and Economic Studies, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “An Empirical Approach to the Problem of Curriculum Content”,International Review of Education 11 (1965), pp. 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husén, T. and Henrysson, S. (ed.),Differentiation and Guidance in the Comprehensive School. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, E.,Kursplaneundersökningar i fysik och kemi. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, U. P.,Frame Factors and the Teaching Process. Project Compass. Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 8. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. and Siöö, M.,Gymnasiets nya arbetsformer. Göteborg: Rapporter från Pedagogiska Institutionen, Göteborgs universitet 1970, no. 50. Mimeographed.

  • SOU 1961: 30,Grundskolan. 1957 års skolberedning VI. Stockholm: Eckleisastikdepartementet, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOU 1963: 41,Specialutredningar om gymnasiet. 1960 års gymnasieutredning III. Stockholm: Ecklesiastikdepartementet, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOU 1963: 42,Ett nytt gymnasium. 1960 års gymnasieutredning IV. Stockholm: Ecklesiastikdepartementet, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolöverstyrelsen,Läroplansöversyn. Grundskolan. Förslag till Kungl. Maj:t angående översyn av läroplan för grundskolan. Stockholm: SÖ-förlaget, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. M. and Geoffrey, L.,The Complexities of an Urban Classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, N.-E.,Ability Grouping and Scholastic Achievement. Dissertation. Stockholm Studies in Educational Psychology 5. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahllöf, U. The curriculum development system in Sweden: Some comments on present trends and problems. Int Rev Educ 19, 218–231 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00598113

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00598113

Keywords

Navigation