Skip to main content
Log in

Economic analysis, common-sense morality and utilitarianism

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic concepts and methods are used to throw light on some aspects of common-sense ethics and the difference between it and Utilitarianism. (1) Very few exceptions are allowed to the rules of common-sense ethics, because of the cost of information required to justify an exception to Conscience and to other people. No such stringency characterizes Utilitarianism, an abstract system constructed by philosophers. (2) Rule Utilitarianism is neither consistent with common-sense ethics, nor does it maximize utility as has been claimed for it. The same is true of more recent variants of Utilitarianism. (3) Second best and first best are usually identical in common-sense ethics. They are often identical in Utilitarianism when a moral situation can be represented by a Prisoner's Dilemma. However, problems arise in permissive forms of Utilitarianism when it is not obvious that second best should be applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner D. J. and G. C. Cain: 1977, ‘Statistical Theories of Discrimination,’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review 30, 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof G. A. and W. T. Dickens: 1982, ‘The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance,’ American Economic Review 72, 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson E.: 1972, The Social Animal, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R. M.: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier K.: 1958, The Moral Point of View, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Elli G. and D. Heyd: 1986, ‘Can Revenge be Just or Otherwise Justified?’, Theoria 52, 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. and R. E. Quandt: 1964, ‘Rules of Thumb and Optimally Imperfect Decisions’, American Economic Review pp. 23–46.

  • Becker G. S.: 1976, ‘Altruism, Egoism and Genetic Fitness: Economics and Sociobiology’, Journal of Economic Literature 14, 817–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok S.: 1980, Lying, Quartet Books Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt R. B.: 1959, Ethical Theory, Prentice-Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt R. B.: 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson W. H. and J. M. Litvak: 1981, Macroeconomics (2nd ed.), Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittan S.: 1983, ‘Two Cheers for Utilitarianism’, Oxford Economic Papers 35, 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danby, H.: 1933, The Mishnah, Oxford University Press.

  • Elster, J.: 1984, Ulysses and the Sirens (revised ed.), Cambridge University Press.

  • Etzioni A.: 1986, ‘The Case for a Multiple-Utility Conception’, Economics and Philosophy 2, 159–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A.: 1987, ‘On Thoughtless Rationality (Rules of Thumb)’, Kyklos 40, 496–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming M.: 1952, ‘A Cardinal Concept of Welfare’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 66, 366–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud S.: 1949, The Ego and the Id, Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilad B., Kaish S., and P. D. Loeb: 1987, ‘Cognitive Dissonance and Utility Maximization’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 8, 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare R. M.: 1981, Moral Thinking, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod R. F.: 1936, ‘Utilitarianism Revisited’, Mind 45, 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J. C.: 1955, ‘Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy 63, 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1977a, Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations, Cambridge University Press.

  • Harsanyi J. C.: 1977b, ‘Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior’, Social Research 44, 623–656, reprinted in A. K. Sen and B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J. C.: 1977c, ‘Rule Utilitarianism and Decision Theory’, Erkenntnis 11, 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J. C.: 1985, ‘Does Reason Tell us What Moral Code to Follow, and, Indeed to Follow any Moral Code at All?’, Ethics 96, 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M. and R. E. Quandt: 1980, Microeconomic Theory, (3rd ed.), McGraw Hill.

  • Hirshleifer J.: 1985, ‘The Expanding Domain of Economics’, American Economic Review 75, Part 6, December, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J.: 1987, ‘The Economic Approach to Conflict’, in G. Radnitzky and P. Bernholz (eds.), Economic Imperialism, Paragon House Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I.: 1946, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Ethics, translated by T. K. Abbott (10th ed.), Longmans, Green and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons D.: 1965, Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, S.: 1982, Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality, University of Chicago Press.

  • Mathews M. C.: 1988, Strategic Intervention in Organizations, Sage Publications Inc., Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreh J.: 1986, ‘Morality and Welfare’, Theory and Decision 21, 209–230.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moreh J.: 1988, ‘Group Behaviour and Rationality’, Social Science Information 27, 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng Y.-K.: 1979, Welfare Economics, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R.: 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps E. S.: 1972, Inflation Policy and Unemployment Theory, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P.: 1984, ‘Alienation, Consequentialism and the Demands of Morality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, pp. 134–171, reprinted in Scheffler (1988).

  • Regan D.: 1980, Utilitarianism and Co-operation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman W. G. and A. K. Sen: 1965, ‘Games, Justice and the General Will’, Mind 74, 554–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S.: 1982, The Rejection of Consequentialism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S.: 1988, (ed.), Consequentialism and its Critics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T. C.: 1978, Micromotives and Macrobehavior, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T. C.: 1984, Choice and Consequences, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K.: 1973, On Economic Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K.: 1974, ‘Choice, Orderings and Morality’, in S. K. Körner (ed.), Practical Reason, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 54–67, reprinted in Sen, Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K.: 1977, ‘Rational Fools: a Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, 317–344, reprinted in Sen, Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K.: 1982, Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H.: 1957, Models of Man, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote M.: 1985, Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1973, ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics’, in Smart and Williams.

  • Smart, J. J. C. and B. Williams: 1973, Utilitarianism — For and Against, Cambridge University Press.

  • Stigler G. J.: 1982, The Economist as Preacher, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow L. C.: 1975, Generating Inequality, Macmillan Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman-Margalit E.: 1977, The Emergence of Norms, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey W.: 1960, ‘Utility Strategy and Social Decision’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 74, 507–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock G. J.: 1971, The Object of Morality, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.: 1973, ‘A Critique of Utilitarianism’, in Smart and Williams.

  • Williams B.: 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Fontana Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is indebted to the members of the Staff Seminar of this Department, especially Professor J. E. Spencer, for useful discussions. He has also greatly benefited from the comments of two referees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moreh, J. Economic analysis, common-sense morality and utilitarianism. Erkenntnis 37, 115–143 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220636

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220636

Keywords

Navigation