Abstract
The research of socio-technical systems went a long road from its beginning in the London Tavistock Institute in the early 1950s [1]. In recent years a shift in socio-technical research publications from blue to white collar work could be observed. This paper proposes a combination of methods from user experience (UX) design and industrial engineering to improve the socio-technical work environment on industrial shopfloors.
The contribution of this paper is threefold: First, an overview of the state of the art in inspection methods in the fields of HCI and industrial engineering is presented. This is based on a literature review and expert interviews. Secondly, a combination of methods from these areas is proposed. In the final part, a preliminary design for a tool supporting the combined methods is presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mumford, E.: The story of socio-technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Inf. Syst. J. 16, 317–342 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00221.x
Geisberger, E., Broy, M.: agendaCPS: Integrierte Forschungsagenda Cyber-Physical Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29099-2
Larsson, Ö., Wiktorsson, M., Cedergren, S.: The third wave of automation: critical factors for industrial digitisation (2014). https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4636.3203
Hirsch-Kreinsen, H.: Digitization of industrial work: development paths and prospects. J. Labour Mark. Res. 49, 1–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-016-0200-6
Dregger, J., Niehaus, J., Ittermann, P., Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., ten Hompel, M.: The digitization of manufacturing and its societal challenges: a framework for the future of industrial labor. In: 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology (ETHICS), pp. 1–3 (2016)
Cherns, A.: The principles of sociotechnical design. Hum. Relat. 29, 783–792 (1976)
Cherns, A.: Principles of sociotechnical design revisted. Hum. Relat. 40, 153–161 (1987)
Mumford, E.: Designing Human Systems for New Technology: The ETHICS Method. Manchester Business School, Manchester (1983)
Mumford, E.: A socio-technical approach to systems design. Requir. Eng. 5, 125–133 (2000)
Bessant, J., Caffyn, S.: High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement. IJTM 14, 7 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1997.001705
Boer, H., Gertsen, F.: From continuous improvement to continuous innovation: a (retro)(per)spective. IJTM (2000). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2003.003391
Salah, S., Rahim, A., Carretero, J.A.: The integration of Six Sigma and lean management. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 1, 249–274 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461011075035
Singh, J., Singh, H.: Kaizen philosophy: a review of literature. IUP J. Oper. Manag. 8, 51 (2009)
Berger, A.: Continuous improvement and kaizen: standardization and organizational designs. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 8, 110–117 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1108/09576069710165792
Pfeiffer, S., Held, M., Lee, H.: Digitalisierung „machen“ – Ansichten im Engineering zur partizipativen Gestaltung von Industrie 4.0. In: Hofmann, J. (ed.) Arbeit 4.0 – Digitalisierung, IT und Arbeit. EH, pp. 113–129. Springer, Wiesbaden (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21359-6_7
Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation. In: Usability Inspection Methods, pp. 25–62. Wiley, New York (1994)
Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256. ACM, New York (1990)
Hertzum, M., Jacobsen, N.E.: The evaluator effect: a chilling fact about usability evaluation methods. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 13, 421–443 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_05
Quiñones, D., Rusu, C., Rusu, V.: A methodology to develop usability/user experience heuristics. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 59, 109–129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.03.002
Jiménez, C., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Inostroza, R., Rusu, V.: Evaluating a methodology to establish usability heuristics. In: 2012 31st International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, pp. 51–59 (2012)
Quinones, D., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Rusu, V., Collazos, C.A.: Developing usability heuristics: a formal or informal process? IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 14, 3400–3409 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2016.7587648
Herrmann, T., Nierhoff, J.: Heuristiken zur Evaluation digitalisierter Arbeit bei Industrie-4.0 und KI-basierten Systemen aus soziotechnischer Perspektive. FGW. Digitalisierung von Arbeit 16 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thewes, F. (2020). Bringing Socio-Technical Design Back to Its Roots: Improving Digitization in the Manufacturing Industry. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1224. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50726-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50726-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50725-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50726-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)