Skip to main content

Burden of Lysosomal Storage Disorders in India: Experience of 387 Affected Children from a Single Diagnostic Facility

  • Research Report
  • Chapter
  • First Online:
JIMD Reports - Volume 12

Abstract

Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are considered to be a rare metabolic disease for the national health forum, clinicians, and scientists. This study aimed to know the prevalence of different LSDs, their geographical variation, and burden on the society. It included 1,110 children from January 2002 to December 2012, having coarse facial features, hepatomegaly or hepatosplenomegaly, skeletal dysplasia, neuroregression, leukodystrophy, developmental delay, cerebral-cerebellar atrophy, and abnormal ophthalmic findings. All subjects were screened for I-cell disease, glycolipid storage disorders (Niemann-Pick disease A/B, Gaucher), and mucopolysaccharide disorders followed by confirmatory lysosomal enzymes study from leucocytes and/or fibroblasts. Niemann-Pick disease-C (NPC) was confirmed by fibroblasts study using filipin stain. Various storage disorders were detected in 387 children (34.8 %) with highest prevalence of glycolipid storage disorders in 48 %, followed by mucopolysaccharide disorders in 22 % and defective sulfatide degradation in 14 % of the children. Less common defects were glycogen degradation defect and protein degradation defect in 5 % each, lysosomal trafficking protein defect in 4 %, and transport defect in 3 % of the patients. This study demonstrates higher incidence of Gaucher disease (16 %) followed by GM2 gangliosidosis that includes Tay-Sachs disease (10 %) and Sandhoff disease (7.8 %) and mucopolysaccharide disorders among all LSDs. Nearly 30 % of the affected children were born to consanguineous parents and this was higher (72 %) in children with Batten disease. Our study also demonstrates two common mutations c.1277_1278insTATC in 14.28 % (4/28) and c.964G>T (p.D322Y) in 10.7 % (3/28) for Tay-Sachs disease in addition to the earlier reported c.1385A>T (p.E462V) mutation in 21.42 % (6/28).

Competing interests: None declared

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aerts JM, van Breemen MJ, Bussink AP et al (2008) Biomarkers for lysosomal storage disorders: identification and application as exemplified by chitotriosidase in Gaucher disease. Acta Paediatr Suppl 97(457):7–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dembure PP, Roesel AR (1991) Screening for mucopolysaccharidoses by analysis of urinary glycosaminoglycans. In: Hommes FA (ed) Techniques in diagnostic human biochemical genetics: a laboratory manual. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Feroze M, Arvindan KP, Jose L (1994) Gaucher’s disease among Mappila muslims of Malabar. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 37(3):307–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filocamo M, Morrone A (2011) Lysosomal storage disorders: molecular basis and laboratory testing. Hum Genomics 5(3):156–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Futerman AH, van Meer G (2004) The cell biology of lysosomal storage disorders. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5(7):554–565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood JJ, Harrison JR (1982) High-resolution electrophoresis of urinary glycosaminoglycans: an improved screening test for the mucopolysaccharidoses. Anal Biochem 119(1):120–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hwu WL, Chien YH, Lee NC et al (2009) Newborn screening for Fabry disease in Taiwan reveals a high incidence of the later-onset mutation c.936 + 919G > A (IVS4 + 919G > A). Hum Mutat 30(10):1397–1405

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaback M, Lim Steele J, Dabholkar D et al (1993) Tay-Sachs disease carrier screening, prenatal diagnosis and the molecular era. An international perspective, 1970–1993. The international TSD data collection Network. JAMA 270:2307–2315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruth HS, Vaughan M (1980) Quantification of low density lipoprotein binding and cholesterol accumulation by single human fibroblasts using fluorescence microscopy. J Lipid Res 21:123–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden D, Levy H (2010) Newborn screening of lysosomal storage disorders. Clin Chem 56(7):1071–1079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, Clague AE et al (1999) Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA 281(3):249–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF (1988) A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16(3):1215

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mistri M, Tamhankar P, Sheth F et al (2012) Identification of novel mutations in HEXA gene in children affected with Tay Sachs disease from India. PLoS One 7(6):e39122. doi:10.1371/journalpone.0039122

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myerowitz R, Costigan FC (1988) The major defect in Ashkenazi Jews with Tay-Sachs disease is an insertion in the gene for alpha-chain of beta-hexosaminidase. J Biol Chem 263:18587–18589

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myerowitz R, Hogikyan ND (1986) Different mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish and non-Jewish French Canadians with Tay-Sachs disease. Science 232(4758):1646–81986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nalini A, Christopher R (2004) Cerebral glycolipidoses: clinical characteristics of 41 pediatric patients. J Child Neurol 19(6):447–452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson-Lawrence EJ, Shandala T, Prodoehl M et al (2010) Lysosomal storage disease: revealing lysosomal function and physiology. Physiology 25(2):102–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto R, Caseiro C, Lemos M et al (2004) Prevalence of lysosomal storage diseases in Portugal. Eur J Hum Genet 12(2):87–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poupetova H, Ledvinova J, Berna L et al (2010) The birth prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders in the Czech Republic: comparison with data in different populations. J Inherit Metab Dis 33(4):387–396

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saftig P, Klumperman J (2009) Lysosome biogenesis and lysosomal membrane proteins: trafficking meets function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(9):623–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapria E, Blitzer MG, Miller JB et al (1989) Fluorometric assays in biochemical genetics: a laboratory Manual. New York: Oxford university press, New York, pp 19–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth J, Patel P, Sheth F et al (2004) Lysosomal storage disorders. Indian Pediatr 41(3):260–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth J, Sheth F, Oza N (2008) Niemann-pick type C disease. Indian Pediatr 45(17):505–507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth J, Sheth F, Oza N et al (2010) Plasma chitotriosidase activity in children with lysosomal storage disorders. Indian J Pediatr 77(2):203–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth J, Mistri M, Kamate M et al (2012) Diagnostic strategy for Mucolipidosis II/III. Indian Pediatr 49(12):975–977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla P, Vasisht S, Srivastava R et al (2011) Molecular and structural analysis of metachromatic leukodystrophy patients in Indian population. J Neurol Sci 301(1–2):38–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staretz-Chacham O, Lang TC, La Marca ME et al (2009) Lysosomal storage disorders in the newborn. Pediatrics 123(4):1191–1207

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vellodi A (2005) Lysosomal storage disorders. Br J Haematol 128(4):413–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verma IC (2000) Burden of genetic disorders in India. Indian J Pediatr 67(12):893–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verma PK, Rangnath P, Dalal AB et al (2012) Spectrum of lysosomal storage disorders at a Medical Genetics Center in North India. Indian Pediatr 49(10):799–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger DA, Coppola S, Liu SL (2003) Insights in to the diagnosis and treatment of lysosomal storage diseases. Arch Neurol 60(3):322–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We sincerely acknowledge the work of Meikle PJ, Pinto R, and Poupetova H and their colleagues from Australia, Portugal, and Czech Republic, respectively, whose publications were of immense help in the preparation of this manuscript. We are grateful to all the referring doctors and patients for their support without whose consent, this study could not have been possible and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) for providing financial support to carry out this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayesh Sheth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Communicated by: Verena Peters

Appendices

Synopsis

This cross-sectional study provides an up-to-date description of the current scenario of different lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) and its burden on the society and highlights the common mutation spectrum for Tay-Sachs disease in India.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Details of the Contributions of Individual Authors

JS designed the experiment and standardized the protocols. MM, NO, and CA were involved in processing of the samples. MJ provided the technical guidelines. RS, AB, KG, NN, CD, MK, and SM were involved in collection of the clinical details. MM, JS, and FS prepared the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 SSIEM and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheth, J. et al. (2013). Burden of Lysosomal Storage Disorders in India: Experience of 387 Affected Children from a Single Diagnostic Facility. In: Zschocke, J., Gibson, K., Brown, G., Morava, E., Peters, V. (eds) JIMD Reports - Volume 12. JIMD Reports, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/8904_2013_244

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/8904_2013_244

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03460-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03461-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics