Skip to main content
Log in

A new generation of mathematics textbook research and development

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper adopts a multimodal approach to the latest generation of digital mathematics textbooks (print and online) to investigate how the design, content, and features facilitate the construction of mathematical knowledge for teaching and learning purposes. The sequential organization of the print version is compared to the interactive format of the online version which foregrounds explanations and important mathematical content while simultaneously ensuring a high level of connectivity and coherence across hierarchical layers of mathematical knowledge. For example, mathematical content in the online version is linked to definitions, theorems, examples and exercises that can be viewed in the original context in which the material was presented, and the content can also be linked to mathematics software. Significantly, the development process for the new generation of mathematics textbooks involves using a ‘design neutral’ markup language so that the books are simultaneously published as both print books and online books. In this development process, the structure of the chapters, sections, and subsections with their various elements are explicitly marked-up in the master document and preserved in the output format, giving rise to new methodologies for large-scale analysis of mathematics textbooks and student use of these books. For example, tracking methodologies and interactive visualizations of student viewings of online mathematical textbooks are identified as new research directions for investigating how students engage with mathematics textbooks within and across different educational contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://hal-emse.ccsd.cnrs.fr/CREAD/hal-01207678v1.

  2. FCLA PDF: http://linear.ups.edu/download/fcla-3.50-print.pdf.

  3. FCLA Online: http://linear.ups.edu/fcla/index.html.

  4. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#FDL.

  5. http://linear.ups.edu/fcla/preface-2.html.

  6. https://pretextbook.org.

  7. http://linear.ups.edu/fcla/section-LT.html.

  8. http://multimodal-analysis.com/products/multimodal-analysis-image/software/index.html.

  9. http://www.sagemath.org/.

  10. This work is part of a study being undertaken by Vilma Mesa, Angeliki Mali, Robert Beezer, and David Farmer at the University of Michigan. For further information, see: http://utmost.aimath.org/.

References

  • Bates, M., & Usiskin, Z. (Eds.). (2016). Digital curricula in school mathematics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beezer, R. A. (2015a). A first course in linear algebra. Gig Harbor, Washington USA: Congruent Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beezer, R. A. (2015b). A first course in linear algebra. Gig Harbor, Washington USA: Congruent Press. http://linear.ups.edu/download/fcla-3.50-print.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2017.

  • Beezer, R. A. (2017). A first course in linear algebra. http://linear.ups.edu/fcla/index.html.

  • Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research and critique (revised ed., Critical perspectives series). Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choppin, J., & Borys, Z. (2017). Trends in the design, development, and use of digital curriculum materials. ZDM Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0860-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: development status and directions. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 633–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2012). Communities, documents and professional geneses: interrelated stories. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources (pp. 305–322). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J. (2014) From clay tablet to computer tablet: The evolution of school mathematics textbooks. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), International conference on mathematics textbook research and development 2014 (ICMT-2014), University of Southampton, United Kingdom, 2931 July 2014 (pp. 3–12).

  • Lemke, J. L. (2003). Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. In M. Anderson, A. Sáenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger & V. V. Cifarelli (Eds.), Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (pp. 215–234). Ottawa: Legas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mali, A., & Mesa, V. (2018, January). Instructorsand studentsuses of dynamic textbooks: What is new? Paper presented at the Joint meeting of the Mathematical Association of America and the American Mathematical Society. San Diego, CA.

  • Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3–39). London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa, V., & Mali, A. (2017, May). Uses of dynamic textbooks in undergraduate mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the II International Conference on Mathematics Textbooks, Rio de Janeiro.

  • O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Inter-semiotic expansion of experiential meaning: Hierarchical scales and metaphor in mathematics discourse. In C. Jones & E. Ventola (Eds.), New developments in the study of ideational meaning: From language to multimodality (pp. 231–254). London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. L. (2015). The language of learning mathematics: A multimodal perspective. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 40 Part A, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: Foundations for change. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(5), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0879-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., Yerushalmy, M., Trouche, L., & Chazan, D. I. (2016). E-Textbooks in/for teaching and learning mathematics: A potentially transformative educational technology. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 636–661). New York and Abingdon Oxon UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezat, S. (2009). The utilization of mathematics textbooks as instruments for learning. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (CERME 6) (pp. 1260–1269). Lyon, France: INRP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezat, S. (2013). The textbook-in-use: Students’ utilization schemes of mathematics textbooks related to self-regulated practicing. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(5), 659–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezat, S., & Rezat, S. (2017). Subject-specific genres and genre awareness in integrated mathematics and language teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7b), 4189–4210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usiskin, Z. (2013). Studying textbooks in an information age—A United States perspective. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 713–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, M. (2014). Challenges to the authoritarian roles of textbooks. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), International conference on mathematics textbook research and development 2014 (ICMT-2014), University of Southampton, United Kingdom, 2931 July 2014 (pp. 13–20).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Robert Beezer wrote the First Course in Linear Algebra. He started work on the textbook in 2004 and continues to work on it today. David Farmer developed the interactive visualizations of the student viewing data. Vilma Mesa and Angeliki Mali, in collaboration with Tom Judson, Robert Beezer and David Farmer, are investigating how instructors and students use FCLA and an Abstract Algebra textbook authored by Tom Judson. Kay O’Halloran and Robert Beezer met at the II International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development (ICMT-2) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on 7–11 May 2017 where they attended each other’s talks. This paper is the result of those meetings and the correspondence between the three authors that subsequently took place. The authors thank Vilma Mesa and Angeliki Mali for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Partial support for the work undertaken by Robert Beezer and David Farmer was provided by the United States National Science Foundation’s Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) program under Award No. 1626455. Vilma Mesa and Angeliki Mali are both personnel on the NSF grant. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kay L. O’Halloran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Halloran, K.L., Beezer, R.A. & Farmer, D.W. A new generation of mathematics textbook research and development. ZDM Mathematics Education 50, 863–879 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0959-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0959-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation