Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Retrieving “Nonretrievable” Inferior Vena Caval Greenfield Filters: A Therapeutic Option for Filter Malpositioning

  • Papers Presented to the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society—Winter Meeting
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Filter malpositioning is a possible complication of inferior vena caval (IVC) filter insertion that may result in inadequate protection from pulmonary embolism. For nonretrievable filters, this is traditionally managed with either observation or additional filter placement. The purpose of this study is determine the incidence of filter malpositioning after bedside insertion under duplex ultrasound (DUS) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, and to report techniques for retrieving and repositioning IVC filters previously considered nonretrievable. All IVC filter insertions performed under DUS or IVUS guidance over an 8-year period were identified. Data regarding insertion technique, device used, and technical success were retrospectively collected. Cases of IVC filter malpositioning were determined and form the basis of this study. Technical details for IVC filter retrieval and repositioning are described. Of 486 patients undergoing DUS (n = 435) or IVUS (n = 51) guided IVC filter insertion, 12 patients (2.4%) had inadequate positioning as determined by postoperative radiography. Two of these patients had no further filter manipulation, three had a second filter placed under fluoroscopic guidance, and the most recent five had filters retrieved and repositioned under fluoroscopic guidance. Of those patients undergoing retrieval and repositioning, all five had Greenfield filters, which are not traditionally regarded as retrievable. All attempted retrievals or replacements were technically successful without additional filter-related complications. Bedside IVC filter insertion under DUS or IVUS guidance has a low incidence of filter misplacement. Although not traditionally regarded as retrievable, Greenfield filters can be safely retrieved and repositioned using advanced endovascular techniques in the event of malpositioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MS Conners Suffix3rd S Becker RJ Guzman et al. (2002) ArticleTitleDuplex scan-directed placement of inferior vena cava filters: a five-year institutional experience J. Vasc. Surg. 35 286–291

    Google Scholar 

  2. CS Joels RF Sing BT Heniford (2003) ArticleTitleComplications of inferior vena cava filters Am. Surg. 69 654–659

    Google Scholar 

  3. CR Nunn D Neuzil T Naslund et al. (1997) ArticleTitleCost-effective method for bedside insertion of vena caval filters in trauma patients J. Trauma 43 752–758

    Google Scholar 

  4. DF Neuzil CL Garrard RA Berkman et al. (1998) ArticleTitleDuplex-directed vena caval filter placement: report of initial experience Surgery 123 470–474

    Google Scholar 

  5. WF Oppat AC Chiou JS Matsumura (1999) ArticleTitleIntravascular ultrasound-guided vena cava filter placement J. Endovasc. Surg. 6 285–287

    Google Scholar 

  6. JS Matsumura MD Morasch (2000) ArticleTitleFilter placement by ultrasound technique at the bedside Semin. Vasc. Surg. 13 199–203

    Google Scholar 

  7. JL Ebaugh AC Chiou MD Morasch et al. (2001) ArticleTitleBedside vena cava filter placement aided with intravascular ultrasound J. Vasc. Surg. 34 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. JV Garrett MA Passman RJ Guzman et al. (2004) ArticleTitleExpanding options for bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters with infravascular ultrasound when transabdominal duplex ultrasound imaging is inadequate Ann. Vasc. Surg. 18 329–334

    Google Scholar 

  9. TC Gamblin DW Ashley S Burch M Solis (2003) ArticleTitleA prospective evaluation of a bedside technique for placement of inferior vena cava filters: accuracy and limitations of intravascular ultrasound Am. Surg. 69 382–386

    Google Scholar 

  10. DW Ashley TC Gamblin ST Burch MM Solis (2001) ArticleTitleAccurate deployment of vena cava filters: comparison of intravascular ultrasound and contrast venography J. Trauma 50 975–981

    Google Scholar 

  11. U Linsenmaier J Rieger F Schenk et al. (1998) ArticleTitleIndications, management, and complications of temporary inferior vena cava filters Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 21 464–469

    Google Scholar 

  12. SF Millward (1998) ArticleTitleTemporary and retrievable inferior vena cava filters: current status J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 9 381–387

    Google Scholar 

  13. LJ Greenfield SL Crate (1980) ArticleTitleRetrieval of the Greenfield vena caval filter Surgery 88 719–722 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6D2MnnsV0%3D Occurrence Handle7434213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. JR Stewart V Loughlin SL Crate LJ Greenfield (1983) ArticleTitleOperative removal of misplaced Greenfield vena caval filters Am. J. Surg. 145 406–407

    Google Scholar 

  15. PA Schneider M Bednarkiewicz (1985) ArticleTitlePercutaneous retrieval of Kimray-Greenfield vena caval filter Radiology 156 547

    Google Scholar 

  16. LS Deutsch (1988) ArticleTitlePercutaneous removal of intracardiac Greenfield vena caval filter A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 151 677–679

    Google Scholar 

  17. IP Markowtiz PK Baliga MD Kerstein (1988) ArticleTitleDealing with difficulties in transjugular Kimray-Greenfield filter insertion—case histories Vasc. Surg. 22 197–199

    Google Scholar 

  18. FY Tsai TV Myers A Ashraf DC Shah (1988) ArticleTitleAberrant placement of a Kimray-Greenfield filter in the right atrium: percutaneous retrieval Radiology 167 423–424

    Google Scholar 

  19. WF Yakes (1988) ArticleTitlePercutaneous retrieval of Kimray-Greenfield filter from right atrium and placement in inferior vena cava Radiology 169 849–851

    Google Scholar 

  20. DF Guthaner JO Wyatt JT Mehigan et al. (1990) ArticleTitleMonorail system for percutaneous repositioning of the Greenfield vena caval filter Radiology 176 872–874

    Google Scholar 

  21. J Huston GG Nicholas AJ Weinstein (1990) ArticleTitleTransvenous “rescue” of a Kimray-Greenfield filter from the right atrium J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino) 31 313–314

    Google Scholar 

  22. J Cynamon CW Bakal SB Epstein G Gabelman (1992) ArticleTitlePercutaneous removal of a titanium Greenfield filter A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 159 777–778

    Google Scholar 

  23. R Queiroz DL Waldman (1998) ArticleTitleTransvenous retrieval of a Greenfield filter lodged in the tricuspid valve Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 44 310–312

    Google Scholar 

  24. GS Hastings S Chughtai DM Radack JG Santilli (2000) ArticleTitleRepositioning the 12-F over-the-wire Greenfield filter J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 11 1207–1210

    Google Scholar 

  25. Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up. Vena Caval Filter Consensus Conference. J Vasc Surg 1999;30:573-579

  26. LJ Greenfield JR McCurdy PP Brown RC Elkins (1973) ArticleTitleA new intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli Surgery 73 599–606

    Google Scholar 

  27. TB Kinney (2003) ArticleTitleUpdate on inferior vena cava filters J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 14 425–440

    Google Scholar 

  28. LJ Greenfield MC Proctor EA James et al. (1994) ArticleTitleStaging of fixation and retrievability of Greenfield filters J. Vasc. Surg. 20 744–750

    Google Scholar 

  29. BE Burbridge DR Walker SF Millward (1996) ArticleTitleIncorporation of the Gunther temporary inferior vena cava filter into the caval wall J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 7 289–290

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Vascular Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

    Matthew A. Corriere MD, Marc A. Passman MD, Raul J. Guzman MD, Jeffery B. Dattilo MD & Thomas C. Naslund MD

Authors
  1. Matthew A. Corriere MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc A. Passman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raul J. Guzman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffery B. Dattilo MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas C. Naslund MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc A. Passman MD.

About this article

Cite this article

Corriere, M.A., Passman, M.A., Guzman, R.J. et al. Retrieving “Nonretrievable” Inferior Vena Caval Greenfield Filters: A Therapeutic Option for Filter Malpositioning. Ann Vasc Surg 18, 629–634 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-004-0099-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-004-0099-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation