Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Freelisting Method

Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

Abstract

A freelist is a mental inventory of items an individual thinks of within a given category. Freelists reveal cultural “salience” of particular notions within groups, and variation in individuals’ topical knowledge across groups. The ease and accuracy of freelist interviewing, or freelisting, makes it ideal for collecting data on health knowledge and beliefs from relatively large samples. Successful freelisting requires researchers to break the research topic into honed categories. Research participants presented with broad prompts tend to “unpack” mental subcategories and may omit (forget) common items or categories. Researchers should find subdomains to present individually for participants to unpack in separate smaller freelists. Researchers may focus the freelist prompts through successive freelisting, pile sorts, or focus group-interviews. Written freelisting among literate populations allows for rapid data collection, possibly from multiple individuals simultaneously. Among nonliterate peoples, using oral freelists remains a relatively rapid method; however, interviewers must prevent bystanders from “contaminating” individual interviewees’ lists. Researchers should cross-check freelist responses with informal methods as much as practicable to contextualize and understand the references therein. With proper attention to detail, freelisting can amass high quality data on people’s medical understanding, attitudes, and behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad FS, Barg FK, Bowles KH, Alexander M, Goldberg LR, French B, Kangovi S, Gallagher TR, Paciotti B, Kimmel SE. Comparing perspectives of patients, caregivers, and clinicians on heart failure management. J Card Fail. 2015;22(3):210–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexiades MN. Collecting ethnobotanical data. In: Alexiades MN, editor. Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: a field manual. Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden; 1996 p. 53–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss EA, Steiner JF, Fernald DH, Crane LA, Main DS. Descriptions of barriers to self-care by persons with comorbid chronic diseases. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(1):15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin B. Ethnobiological classification. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin EA, Berlin B. Medical ethnobiology of the highland Maya of Chiapas, Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 5th ed. Lanham: Altamira/Rowman & Littlefield; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton P, Tang AM. Using ethnographic methods in the selection of post-disaster, mental health interventions. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2004;19(01):97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton R, Curtis A, Thomas L. Nepali color terms: salience in a listing task. J Steward Anthropol Soc. 1980;12:309–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP. Using Anthropac to investigate a cultural domain. Cult Anthropol Methods Newsl. 1990;2(1):8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP. ANTHROPAC 4.00 methods guide. Columbia: Analytic Technologies; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP. Elicitation techniques for cultural domain analysis. In: Schensul J, LeCompte M, editors. The ethnographer's toolkit. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 1999. p. 115–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster JS. Introduction. Am Behav Sci. 1987;31:150–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradway CW, Barg F. Developing a cultural model for long-term female urinary incontinence. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(12):3150–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradway C, Dahlberg B, Barg FK. How women conceptualize urinary incontinence: a cultural model. J Women’s Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(8):1533–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer D. Cognitive indicators of knowledge in semantic domains. J Quant Anthropol. 1995;5:1047–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer D. Supplementary interviewing techniques to maximize output in free listing tasks. Field Methods. 2002;14(1):108–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceuterick M, Vandebroek I, Torry B, Pieroni A. Cross-cultural adaptation in urban ethnobotany: the Colombian folk pharmacopoeia in London. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;120(3):342–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandon-Malamud L. From the fat of our souls: social change, political process, and medical pluralism in Bolivia. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade RG. Modal responses and cultural expertise. Am Behav Sci. 1987;31:194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiks AG, Gafen A, Hughes CC, Hunter KF, Barg FK. Using freelisting to understand shared decision making in ADHD: parents’ and pediatricians’ perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):236–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finerman R, Sackett R. Using home gardens to decipher health and healing in the Andes. Med Anthropol Q. 2003;17(4):459–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores KE, Quinlan MB. Ethnomedicine of menstruation in rural Dominica, West Indies. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;153(3):624–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlow CA. Comparing indicators of knowledge within and between cultural domains. Field Methods. 2003;15(1):51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatewood JB. Loose talk: linguistic competence and recognition ability. Am Anthropol. 1983;85(2):378–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatewood JB. Familiarity, vocabulary size, and recognition ability in four semantic domains. Am Ethnol. 1984;11:507–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannini P, Heinrich M. Xki yoma’ (our medicine) and xki tienda (patent medicine) – interface between traditional and modern medicine among the Mazatecs of Oaxaca, Mexico. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;121(3):383–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravlee CC, Bernard HR, Maxwell CR, Jacobsohn A. Mode effects in free-list elicitation: comparing oral, written, and web-based data collection. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2012;31(1):119–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handwerker WP, Borgatti SP. Reasoning with numbers. In: Bernard HR, Gravelee CC, editors. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2014. p. 519–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley N. A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav. 1969;8:176–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hruschka DJ, Sibley LM, Kalim N, Edmonds JK. When there is more than one answer key: cultural theories of postpartum hemorrhage in Matlab, Bangladesh. Field Methods. 2008;20(4):315–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson JW. Expertise and structure of free recall. In: Bagozzi RP, Tybout AM, editors. Advances in consumer research. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research; 1983. p. 585–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucan SC, Barg FK, Karasz A, Palmer CS, Long JA. Concepts of healthy diet among urban, low-income, African Americans. J Community Health. 2012;37(4):754–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathez-Stiefel SL, Brandt R, Lachmuth S, Rist S. Are the young less knowledgeable? Local knowledge of natural remedies and its transformations in the Andean highlands. Hum Ecol. 2012;40(6):909–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael C. Robbins, Justin M. Nolan, Diana Chen. An Improved Measure of Cognitive Salience in Free Listing Tasks. Field Methods. 2017;1525822X1772672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan JM. Pursuing the fruits of knowledge: cognitive ethnobotany in Missouri’s little Dixie. J Ethnobiol. 2001;21(2):29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan JM. Wild plant classification in little Dixie: variation in a regional culture. J Ecol Anthropol. 2002;6:69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan JM. Ethnobotany in Missouri’s little Dixie: cognitive ecology in a regional culture. Lanham: University Press of America; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan JM, Robbins MC. Cultural conservation of medicinal plant use in the Ozarks. Hum Organ. 1999;58:67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieroni A, Sheikh QZ, Ali W, Torry B. Traditional medicines used by Pakistani migrants from Mirpur living in Bradford, Northern England. Complement Ther Med. 2008;16(2):81–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan MB. Bush medicine in Bwa Mawego: Ethnomedicine and medical botany of common illnesses in a Caribbean village. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia. An Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Publishing. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan MB. From the bush: the frontline of health care in a Caribbean village. Belmont: Wadsworth/Cengage Publishing; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan MB. Ethnomedicine and ethnobotany of fright, a Caribbean culture-bound psychiatric syndrome. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010;6(9):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan MB, Flores KE. Bush medicine in Dominica: ethnophysiology and medical ethnobotany in a Caribbean horticultural village. Contributions in ethnobiology series. Denton: The Society of Ethnobiology; in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan MB, Quinlan RJ. Modernization and medicinal plant knowledge in a Caribbean horticultural village. Med Anthropol Q. 2007;21(2):169–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan MB, Quinlan RJ, Nolan JM. Ethnophysiology and herbal treatments of intestinal worms in Dominica, West Indies. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;80(1):75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan MB, Quinlan RJ, Council SK, Roulette JW. Children’s acquisition of ethnobotanical knowledge in a Caribbean horticultural village. J Ethnobiol. 2016;36(2):433–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan M. Considerations for collecting freelists in the field: Examples from Ethobotany. Field Methods 2016;17(3):219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins MC, Nolan JM. A measure of dichotomous category bias in freelisting tasks. Cult Anthropol Methods J. 1997;9:8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney A, D’Andrade R. Cognitive aspects of English kin terms. Am Anthropol. 1964;66(3.): 146–70. Part 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan G, Nolan J, Yoder S. Successive free listing: using multiple free lists to generate explanatory models. Field Methods. 2000;12(2):83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JJ. Using ANTHROPAC 3.5 and a spreadsheet to compute a free list salience index. Cult Anthropol Methods Newsl. 1993;5(3):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JJ, Furbee L, Maynard K, Quick S, Ross L. Salience counts: a domain analysis of English color terms. J Linguist Anthropol. 1995;5(2):203–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter RT II. Remedios cseros: Mexican American home remedies and community health problems. Soc Sci Med. 1981;15B:107–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter RT II, Schensul JJ, Kostick KM. Theories and methods in applied anthropology. In: Bernard HR, Gravelee CC, editors. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2014. p. 661–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldstein A. Mexican migrant ethnopharmacology: pharmacopoeia, classification of medicines and explanations of efficacy. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;108(2):299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller SC. Shared knowledge, intracultural variation, and knowledge aggregation. Am Behav Sci. 1987;312:178–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller S, Romney AK. Systematic data collection. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99163, USA

    Marsha B. Quinlan

Authors
  1. Marsha B. Quinlan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marsha B. Quinlan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Health, Locked Bag 1797, CA.02.35, Western Sydney Univ, School of Science & Health, Locked Bag 1797, CA.02.35, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Quinlan, M.B. (2017). The Freelisting Method. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_12-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_12-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    The Freelisting Method
    Published:
    23 December 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_12-2

  2. Original

    The Freelisting Method
    Published:
    18 August 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_12-1

Search

Navigation