History of Global Bioethics

Reference work entry

Abstract

“Globalization” is a new concept, especially in ethics, where the term used to mean the generalization of moral duties to all mankind has been “universalization.” This word has been common in ethics since the eighteenth century, when Kant introduced the “principle of universalization” as the canon of human morality. But during the past two centuries, many things have changed, due principally to the scientific and technological developments. Telecommunications today make it possible to exchange all kinds of information immediately. The world is, for the first time, an informational network, in which everyone can know what is happening everywhere. The world, then, has become a “global village.” This globalization made possible the globalization of financial and commercial markets starting in the early 1980s. The great economic crisis suffered by the Western world since 2007, without any precedent in the history of mankind, is generally interpreted as the consequence of the achievement of a global market, without the counterweight of an effective political and moral globalization. The ideology of profit as the main goal, or the only one, in human actions is one of the causes, perhaps the most important, of the present disaster. There are two types of human values, some intrinsic and others instrumental. The first are the most important in human lives, and these cannot be measured in monetary units. Ethics deals primarily with these intrinsic values and then the importance of its culture. When, on the contrary, only the instrumental values are at stake, or when they take the first place, then what Habermas calls “strategic action” or “instrumental rationality” comes ahead. That is, perhaps, what now is happening.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Global Governance Moral Duty Universal Declaration Natural Thing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aristotle. (1984). The Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borry, P., Schotsmans, P., & Dierickx, K. (2006). How international is bioethics? A quantitative retrospective study. BMC Medical Ethics, 7(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boulding, E. (1988). Building a global civil culture: Education for an independent World. New York: Teachers College Pr.Google Scholar
  4. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr. (Ed.) (2006). Global bioethics: The collapse of consensus. Salem, MA: M&M Scrivener Press.Google Scholar
  5. Finkler, K. (2008). Can bioethics be global and local, or must be both? Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(2), 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Florini, A. M. (Ed.) (2000). The third force: The rise of transnational civil society. Tokio and Washington: Carnegie Endowment.Google Scholar
  7. Fox, R. C., & Swazey, J. P. (2008). Observing bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history. The National Interest, 16, 3–18.Google Scholar
  9. Gracia, D. (2011). La cuestión del valor. Madrid: Real Academia de Ciencias Morales y Políticas.Google Scholar
  10. Habermas, J. (2008). Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, J. (2008). Global norms, informed consensus and hypocrisy in bioethics. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. Jauss (Eds.), Global bioethics: Issues of conscience for the twenty-first century (pp. 297–323). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Held, D. (1995). Democarcy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Holm, S., & Williams-Jones, B. (2006). Global bioethics: Myth or reality? BMC Medical Ethics, 7(1), 1–10. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-7-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Küng, H. (1991). Global responsibility. In search of a new World ethic. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  17. Küng, H., & Kuschel, K. J. (Eds.) (1993). A global ethic. The declaration of the parliament of the World’s religions. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  18. Marshall, P., & Koenig, B. (2004). Accounting for culture in a globalized bioethics. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 32(2), 252–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLuhan, M., & Powers, B. R. (1989). The global village: Transformations in World life and media in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mittelman, J. H. (2000). The globalization syndrome: Transformation and resistance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Oliveira, M. D., & Tandon, R. (1994). Citizens: Strengthening global civil society. Washington, DC: Civicus.Google Scholar
  22. Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Potter, V. R. (1988). Global bioethics. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Reich, W. (1995). The Word “bioethics”: The struggle over its earliest meanings. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schroeder, D. (2005). Human rights and their role in global bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly: Healthcare Ethics, 14, 221–223.Google Scholar
  27. Soros, G. (1998). The crisis of global capitalism: Open society endangered. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  28. Turner, L. (2003). Bioethics in a multicultural World: Medicine and morality in pluralistic setting. Health Care Analysis, 11(2), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. U.N. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. (http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Brundtland_Report).
  30. Williams, J. (2005). UNESCO’s proposed declaration on bioethics and human rights. A bland compromise. Developing World Bioethics, 5(3), 210–215 [Special Issue: Reflections on the UNESCO draft declaration on bioethics and human rights].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zieler, K. (2009). Self and other in global bioethics: Critical hermeneutics and the example of different death concepts. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 12, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Complutense University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations