Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Offenheit, Zugänglichkeit und Teilhabe an digitaler Medienforschung: das Beispiel teil-automatisierte Inhaltsanalyse in sozialen Medien

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Digitale Medien und Methoden

  • 67 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Wie zugänglich ist die digitale Medienforschung? Im Beitrag werden anhand eigener Forschungsarbeiten epistemologische und sozio-technische Zugänge zur qualitativ-empirisch angelegten Social-Media-Forschung diskutiert. Dies beinhaltet Aspekte des Zugangs zu Untersuchungsgegenständen, Forschungsfragen, Daten, Analysewerkzeugen, Methodenwissen, Kompetenzen, Institutionen und Infrastrukturen. 

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Agre, Philip E. 1997. Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned trying to reform AI. In Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work: Beyond the great divide, Hrsg. Geoffrey Bowker, Susan Leigh Star, Les Gasser, und William Turner. Mahwah: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allgaier, Joachim. 2019. Science and environmental communication on YouTube: Strategically distorted communications in online videos on climate change and climate engineering. Frontiers in Communication 4:36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allgaier, Joachim, und Asheley R. Landrum. 2022. New directions in science and environmental communication: understanding the role of online video-sharing and online video-sharing platforms for science and research communication, Frontiers research topics. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88974-364-3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, Eric P. S., David Mimno, Shion Guha, Emily Quan, und Geri K. Gay. 2017. Comparing grounded theory and topic modeling: Extreme divergence or unlikely convergence? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68(6): 1397–1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellina, Larissa, Anna Grebe, Beate Ochsner, und Ursula Schimmel. 2012. Medien und Disability Studies. Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 6(1): 242–246. https://doi.org/10.25969/MEDIAREP/2697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, Cora, und Martin Zillinger. 2015. Einführung. In Handbuch der Medienethnographie, Hrsg. Cora Bender und Martin Zillinger, 1. Aufl., XI–XVI. Berlin: Reimer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borra, Erik, und Bernhard Rieder. 2014. Programmed method: Developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets. Aslib Journal of Information Management 66(3): 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E. 2003. Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction 26(4): 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E., Carrie Friese, und Rachel Washburn. 2015. Situational analysis in practice: Mapping research with grounded theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medienwissenschaft. 2023. Webseite der Arbeitsgruppe Open Media Studies. https://gfmedienwissenschaft.de/gesellschaft/ags/openmediastudies. Zugegriffen am 24.10.2022.

  • Europäische Union. 2016. Datenschutz-Grundverordnung. Verordnung (EU) des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates – vom 27. April 2016 – zum Schutz natürlicher Personen bei der Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten, zum freien Datenverkehr und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 95/46/EG (Datenschutz-Grundverordnung). 2016/679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fecher, Benedikt, und Sascha Friesike. 2014. Open science: One term, five schools of thought. In Opening science, Hrsg. Sönke Bartling und Sascha Friesike, 17–47. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Matthew. 2005. Media ecologies: Materialist energies in art and technoculture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaborit, Liv S. 2019. Looking through the prison gate: Access in the field of ethnography. Cadernos Pagu 55. https://doi.org/10.1590/18094449201900550005.

  • Gitelman, Lisa. 2013. „Raw data“ is an oxymoron. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G., und Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: De Gruyter. https://books.google.de/books?id=oUxEAQAAIAAJ.

  • Gray, Jonathan, Carolin Gerlitz, und Liliana Bounegru. 2018. Data infrastructure literacy. Big Data & Society 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718786316.

  • Griffin, Matthew, Susanne Herrmann, und Friedrich A. Kittler. 1996. „Technologies of Writing: Interview with Friedrich A. Kittler“. New Literary History 27(4): 731–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.1996.0049.

  • Gröndahl, Tommi, Luca Pajola, Mika Juuti, Mauro Conti, und N. Asokan. 2018. All you need is ‚love‘: Evading hate speech detection. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM workshop on artificial intelligence and security, 2–12. Toronto: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270101.3270103.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsbrunner, Simon David. 2021a. A new science for future. Climate impact modeling and the quest for digital openness. Bielefeld: transcript. https://www.transcript-verlag.de/media/pdf/c6/cc/fd/oa978383945265321OeaDHvQ1fU9.pdf.

  • ———. 2021b. Negotiating the data deluge on YouTube: Practices of knowledge appropriation and articulated ambiguity around visual scenarios of sea-level rise futures. Frontiers in Communication 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.613167.

  • Hirsbrunner, Simon David, Michael Tebbe, und Claudia Müller-Birn. 2022. From critical technical practice to reflexive data science. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (Special issue: Critical technical practice(s) in digital research). https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221132243.

  • Hotham, Tristan. 2018. Facebook risks starting a war on knowledge. The Conversation. August, 17. http://theconversation.com/facebook-risks-starting-a-war-on-knowledge-101646. Zugegriffen am 04.07.2023.

  • Iliadis, Andrew, und Federica Russo. 2016. Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238.

  • Kitchin, Rob. 2014. The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, John. 2004. After method. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lucke, Jörn von, und Christian Geiger. 2010. Open Government Data – Frei verfügbare Daten des öffentlichen Sektors. Gutachten für die Deutsche Telekom AG zur T-City Friedrichshafen. Friedrichshafen: Deutsche Telekom Institute for Connected Cities, Zeppelin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mediarep. 2023. https://www.mediarep.org. Zugegriffen am 24.10.2022.

  • Merkens, Hans. 1997. Stichproben bei qualitativen Studien. In Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft, Hrsg. Barbara Friebertshäuser und Annedore Prengel, 97–106. Weinheim/München: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müggenburg, Jan. 2021. Special education in the US between 1975 and 1985. A media-archeological perspective on digital inclusion. In Inklusion als Chiffre? Hrsg. Michaela Vogt, Mai-Anh Boger, und Patrick Bühler. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt. https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/abs/10.35468/9783781559134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, Michael, Shion Guha, Eric P. S. Baumer, David Mimno, und N. Sadat Shami. 2016. Machine learning and grounded theory method: convergence, divergence, and combination. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on supporting group work – Group ’16, 3–8. Sanibel Island: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957280.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Geographic und Science Insider. 2015. How earth would look if all the ice melted. https://youtu.be/VbiRNT_gWUQ. Zugegriffen am 24.10.2022.

  • Park, Ji-Hong, und Jian Qin. 2009. Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept open access: A grounded theory approach. The State of Scholarly Publishing 38(2): 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/scp.2007.0009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentzold, Christian, und Manuel Menke. 2020. Conceptualizing the doings and sayings of media practices: Expressive performance, communicative understanding, and epistemic discourse. International Journal of Communication 14:2789–2809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pousti, Hamid, Cathy Urquhart, und Henry Linger. 2021. Researching the virtual: A framework for reflexivity in qualitative social media research. Information Systems Journal 31(3): 356–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieder, Bernhard. 2013. Studying Facebook via data extraction: the Netvizz application. Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM web science conference: 346–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. YouTube data tools (Version 1.11). https://tools.digitalmethods.net/netvizz/youtube/. Zugegriffen am 04.07.2023.

  • Rothe, Katja. 2016. Medienökologie – Zu einer Ethik des Mediengebrauchs. Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 14(1): 46–57. https://doi.org/10.25969/MEDIAREP/1714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert, Evelyn, und Stephan Scheel. 2019. The politics of method: Taming the new, making data official. International Political Sociology 13(3): 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olz009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, Edward. 2013. Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaver, Nick, und Tarleton Gillespie. 2015. Critical algorithm studies: A reading list. Social Media Collective (blog), 5. November. https://socialmediacollective.org/reading-lists/critical-algorithm-studies/. Zugegriffen am 04.09.2023.

  • Tebbe, Michael, Simon David Hirsbrunner, und Claudia Müller-Birn. 2021. Reflexive Machine Learning Toolbox. Python. Berlin. https://github.com/FUB-HCC/Reflexive-Machine-Learning-Toolbox. [Software]. Zugegriffen am 04.10.2023.

  • Universität Amsterdam. 2023. YouTube data tools. https://tools.digitalmethods.net/netvizz/youtube/. Zugegriffen am 24.10.2022.

  • Van Geenen, Daniela. 2020. Critical affordance analysis for digital methods: The case of Gephi. In Explorations in digital cultures, Hrsg. Marcus Burkhardt, Mary Shnayien, und Katja Grashöfer, 1–2. Lüneburg: meson press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieweg, Sarah, Amanda L. Hughes, Kate Starbird, und Leysia Palen. 2010. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’10: 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753486.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Internationales Zentrum für Ethik in den Wissenschaften (IZEW), Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland

    Simon David Hirsbrunner

Authors
  1. Simon David Hirsbrunner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon David Hirsbrunner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland

    Sven Stollfuß

  2. Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland

    Laura Niebling

  3. Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Deutschland

    Felix Raczkowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hirsbrunner, S.D. (2024). Offenheit, Zugänglichkeit und Teilhabe an digitaler Medienforschung: das Beispiel teil-automatisierte Inhaltsanalyse in sozialen Medien. In: Stollfuß, S., Niebling, L., Raczkowski, F. (eds) Handbuch Digitale Medien und Methoden. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36629-2_7-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36629-2_7-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-36629-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-36629-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation