Zusammenfassung
Auf Social-Media-Plattformen werden wir täglich mit vernetzten Inhalten unterschiedlichster Art konfrontiert. Bilder, die online zirkulieren, stehen selten exklusiv für sich, sondern sind eingebettet in die Verdatungs- und Distributionsmechanismen digitaler Medien. Dieser Beitrag diskutiert methodische Variationen im Umgang mit user-generierten, web-distribuierten und plattformspezifischen Bilderwelten. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf die im Prozess der Bildzirkulation verwickelten Datenpraktiken. Zur Veranschaulichung stehen die im Zuge des Pornografieverbots auf Tumblr geteilten Memes im Zentrum einer explorativen Analyse mit digitalen Methoden.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Arkenbout, Chloe, und Laurence Scherz, Hrsg. 2022. Critical meme reader II. Memetic tacticality. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
Burkhardt, Sarah, und Richard Rogers. 2022. Using computer vision techniques to study images from the web. Sage Research Methods: Doing Research Online. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529608373.
Chao, Jason. 2023. Memespector-GUI: Graphical User Interface Client for Computer Vision APIs (Version 0.2.5). https://github.com/jason-chao/memespector-gui. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Clarke, Adele E. 2003. Situational analyses. Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction 26(4): 553–576.
Colombo, Gabriele. 2018. The design of composite images (PhD Dissertation). Politecnico di Milano. https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/141266. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Colombo, Gabriele, Liliana Bounegru, und Jonathan Gray. 2023. Visual models for social media image analysis: Groupigs, engagement, trends, and rankings. International Journal of Communication 17:1956–1983. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18971. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Crawford, Kate. 2021. Atlas of AI. New Haven/London: Yale Univeristy Press.
D’Andrea, Carlos, und Andre Mintz. 2019. Studying the live cross-platform circulation of images with computer vision API: An experiment based on a sports media event. International Journal of Communication 13:1825–1845.
D’Ignazio, Catherine, und Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Denson, Shane, und Andreas Jahn-Sudmann. 2013. Digital seriality: On the serial aesthetics and practice of digital games. Eludamos 7(1):1–32. https://www.eludamos.org/index.php/eludamos/article/view/vol7no1-1/7-1-1-html. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Dieter, Michael, Carolin Gerlitz, Anne Helmond, et al. 2019. Multi-situated app studies. Methods and propositions. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119846486.
Frosh, Paul. 2019. Screenshots. Wagenbach: Berlin.
Geboers, Marloes Annette, und Chad Thomas Van De Wiele. 2020. Machine vision and social media images: Why hashtags matter. Social Media + Society 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120928485.
Geboers, Marloes, Nathan Stolero, Anna Scuttari, Livia Van Vliet, und Arran Ridley. 2020. Why buttons matter: Repurposing Facebook’s reactions for analysis of the social visal. International Journal of Communication. 14:1564–1585.
Gerling, Winfried, Susanne Holschbach, und Petra Löffler. 2018. Bilder Verteilen: Fotographische Praktiken in der digitalen Kultur. Bielefeld: transcript.
Gerlitz, Carolin. 2017. Soziale Medien. In Handbuch Popkultur, Hrsg. Thomas Hecken und Marcus Kleiner, 235–238. Stuttgart: JB Metzler.
Gerlitz, Carolin, und Bernhard Rieder. 2018. Tweets are not created equal. A platform perspective on social media metrics. International Journal of Communication 12:528–547.
Gillespie, Tarleton. 2022. Do not recommend? Reduction as a form of content moderation. Social Media+ Society 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221117552.
Gitelman, Lisa, Hrsg. 2013. „Raw Data“ is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Cloud Vision API. 2023a. Detect text in images. https://cloud.google.com/vision/docs/ocr. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
———. 2023b. Detect labels. https://cloud.google.com/vision/docs/labels. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
———. 2023c. Detect Web entities and pages. https://cloud.google.com/vision/docs/detecting-web. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Hagen, Sal. 2017. Polandball is of Reddit: How r/polandball transcends memes through carefully curated geopolitical satire. Institute of Network Cutlures. https://networkcultures.org/longform/2017/11/15/polandball-is-of-reddit-how-rpolandball-transcends-memes-through-carefully-curated-geopolitical-satire/. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Hasty, Nick. 2017. Enhancing giphy search with Google Cloud ML tools. Giphy Engineering. https://engineering.giphy.com/enhancing-giphy-search-with-google-cloud-ml-tools/. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Hillis, Ken, Michael Petit, und Kylie Jarret. 2013. Google and the culture of search. London: Routledge.
Hochman, Nadav. 2014. The social media image. Big Data & Society 1(2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714546645.
Jacomy, M., T. Venturini, S. Heymann, et al. 2014. ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE 9(6): 1–12.
Koul, Anirudh, Siddha Ganju, und Meher Kasam. 2019. Practical deep learning for cloud, mobile, and edge: Real-world AI & computer vision projects using Python, Keras & Tensor Flow. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.
Lully, V., P. Laublet, M. Stankovic, und F. Radulovic. 2018. Exploring the synergy between knowledge graph and computer vision for personalization systems. Procedia Computer Science 137:175–186.
MacKenzie, Adrian, und Ana Munster. 2019. Platform seeing: Image ensembles and their invisualities. Theory, Culture & Society. 36(5): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419847508.
Manovich, Lev. 2003. ‘Metadating’ the image. In Making art of databases, Hrsg. Lev Manovich, 13–22. Rotterdam: V2 Publishing.
———. 2011. Style space: How to compare image sets and follow their evolution, Manovich.net.http://manovich.net/content/04-projects/073-style-space/70_article_2011.pdf. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
———. 2020. Cultural analytics. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Manovich, Lev, Matias Giachino, und Jay Chow. 2014. Image montage, ImageJ. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/plugins/image-montage/index.html. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Marcus George, E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24:95–117.
Marres, Noortje, Gabriele Colombo, Liliana Bounegru, Jonathan W. Y. Gray, Carolin Gerlitz, und James Tripp. 2023. Testing and not testing for coronavirus on Twitter: Surfacing testing situations across scales with interpretative methods. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231196538.
Mauri, Michele, Tomasso Elli, Giorgio Caviglia, et al. 2017. RAWGraphs: A visualisation platform to create open outputs. Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI 28:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125571.3125585.
Milner, Ryan M. 2016. The world made meme: Public conversations and participatory media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mitchell, W. J. T. 1995. Metapictures. In Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation, 35–82. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Moskatova, Olga, Laura K. Mücke, und Chris Tedjasukmana. 2022. # messy images. Unordnungen vernetzter Bilder. Montage AV 1. https://www.montage-av.de/a_2022_1_31.html. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Niederer, Sabine, und Gabriele Colombo. 2019. Visual methodologies for networked images: Designing visualizations for collaborative research, cross-platform analysis, and public participation. Revista Diseña 14:40–67. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.14.40-67.
Nowotny, Joanna, und Julian Reidy. 2022. Memes. Formen und Folgen eines Internetphänomens. Bielefeld: transcript.
Omena, J., Elena Pilipets Janna, Beatrice Gobo, und Jason Chao. 2021. The potentials of Google Vision API-based networks to study natively digital images. Revista Diseña 19:1–25. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.19.Article.1.
Paasonen, Susanna, Kylie Jarrett, und Ben Light. 2019. NSFW: Sex, humor, and risk in social media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Parikka, J., und T. Dvorak. 2021. Introduction. On the Scale, Quantity and Measure of Images. In Photography of the Scale: Technologies and Theories of the Mass Image, Hrsg. T. Dvorak und J. Parikka, 1–24. Edinburgh University Press.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2016. Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society 19(3): 307–324.
Parry, Kyle. 2022. A theory of assembly. From museums to memes. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.
Paßmann, Johannes, und Carolin Gerlitz. 2014. Fav, Retweet und Like ‘Good’ platform-political reasons for ‘bad’ platform-data. Zur sozio-technischen Geschichte der Plattformaktivitäten ‘Fav’, ‘Retweet’ und ‘Like’. Mediale Kontrolle unter Beobachtung 3(1): 1–40. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13782.
Pilipets, Elena. 2023. Hashtagging, duetting, sound-linking. TikTok gestures and methods of (in)distinction. MAST 4(1): 109–135. https://doi.org/10.59547/26911566.4.1.07.
Pilipets, Elena, und Susanna Paasonen. 2020. Nipples, Memes, and algorithmic failure: NSFW critique of Tumblr censorship. New Media & Society 24(6): 1459–1480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820979280.
———. 2024. Memetic commenting: Armenian Curses and the Twitter theater of Trump’s deselection. International Journal of Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779231220397.
Pilipets, Elena, Flores Ana Marta, Flaim Giacomo, et al. 2020. From tumblr purge to female nipples: telling a story of platform censorship critique through memes and digital methods. Smart Data Sprint Reports. https://metodosdigitais.fcsh.unl.pt/?page_id=1894. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Rambukkana, Nathan. 2015. Hashtags as technosocial events. In Hashtag publics. The power and politics of discursive networks, Hrsg. Nathan Rambukkana, 1–12. New York: Peter Lang.
Rasband, W. S. (1997–2018). ImageJ. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda. https://imagej.net/ij/. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Rieder, Bernhard. 2015. Tumblr rool: a small script to create a network file from co-tagging on tumblr. PHP. https://github.com/bernorieder/TumblrTool/wiki. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Rieder, Bernhard, Stijn Peeters, und Erik Borra. 2022. From tool to tool-making: Reflections on authorship in social media research software. Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221127094.
Rogers, Richard. 2019. Doing digital methods. London: Sage.
———. 2021. Visual media analysis for Instagram and other online platforms. Big Data & Society 8(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211022370.
Rogers, Richard, und Giulia Giorgi. 2023. What is a meme, technically speaking? Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2174790.
Rose, Gillian. 2023. Visial methodologies. An introduction to researching with visual materials, 5. Aufl. London: Sage.
Rothöhler, Simon. 2018. Informationen, die Bilder haben. Zur Moderierbarkeit von visuellem Content. Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 10(19): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/1232.
Rubinstein, Daniel, und Katrina Sluis. 2013. Concerning the undecidability of the digital image. Photographies 6:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2013.788848.
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in digital culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Steyerl, Hito. 2009. In defense of the poor image. E-Flux Journal 10(11). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/10/61362/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Tiffany, Kaitlyn. 2019. When Tumblr bans porn, who loses? Vox. https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/12/4/18126112/tumblr-porn-ban-verizon-ad-goals-sex-work-fandom. Zugegriffen am 02.04.2023.
Tiidenberg, Katrin. 2019. Playground in memoriam: missing the pleasures of NSFW tumblr. Porn Studies 6(3): 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2019.1667048.
Zulli, Diana, und David James Zulli. 2021. Extending the Internet Meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448209836.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pilipets, E. (2024). Vernetzte Bilder als Datenpraktiken: Analyse plattformbasierter Bildzirkulation. In: Stollfuß, S., Niebling, L., Raczkowski, F. (eds) Handbuch Digitale Medien und Methoden. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36629-2_31-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36629-2_31-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-36629-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-36629-2
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Vernetzte Bilder als Datenpraktiken: Analyse plattformbasierter Bildzirkulation- Published:
- 27 April 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36629-2_31-2
-
Original
Vernetzte Bilder als Datenpraktiken: Analyse plattformbasierter Bildzirkulation- Published:
- 16 February 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36629-2_31-1