Skip to main content

Welche Impulse liefert interkulturelles Management für Diversity Management?

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbuch Diversity Kompetenz: Gegenstandsbereiche

Zusammenfassung

Zwischen Diversity Management und Interkulturellem Management existieren in Forschung und Praxis nur wenige Wechselbeziehungen, obwohl sie sich wichtige Impulse liefern könnten. Dieser Buchbeitrag stellt zum einen auf Basis eines Paradigmenmodells aus der Organisationsforschung einen Orientierungsrahmen für den Forschungsstand in Diversity Management und Interkulturellem Management bereit; zum anderen wird anhand eines Fallbeispiels illustriert wie exemplarisch gewählte Modelle des Interkulturellen Managements für das Diversity Management und für die Entwicklung von Kompetenzen von Nutzen sein können.

Die Originalversion dieses Kapitels wurde revidiert: Zusammenfassung und Einleitung wurden korrigiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adib, A., & Guerrier, Y. (2003). The interlocking of gender with nationality, race, ethnicity and class: The narratives of women in hotel work. Gender, Work & Organization, 10(4), 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N. (2002). International dimensions of organizational behavior (4. Aufl). Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARTE (2010). Karambolage spezial: die Kulissen von arte. http://www.arte.tv/de/karambolage-spezial-die-kulissen-von-arte/3558066,CmC=3558072.html. Zugegriffen am 10.03.2015.

  • ARTE (2014). ARTE GEIE, Die Zentrale in Straßburg. http://www.arte.tv/de/arte-geie/7870412,CmC=2196658.html. Zugegriffen am 03.03.2015.

  • Barmeyer, C. (2000). Interkulturelles Management und Lernstile. Frankfurt a. M: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmeyer, C. (2010). Kulturdimensionen und Kulturstandards. In C. Barmeyer et al. (Hrsg.), Interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kulturwissenschaft. Grundbegriffe, Wissenschaftsdisziplinen, Kulturräume (S. 87–117). Stutz: Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmeyer, C. (2012). Taschenlexikon Interkulturalität. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmeyer, C., & Davoine, E. (2011). Kontextualisierung interkultureller Kompetenz in einer deutsch-französischen Organisation: ARTE. In W. Dreyer & U. Hößler (Hrsg.), Perspektiven interkultureller Kompetenz (S. 299–315). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barmeyer, C., & Davoine, E. (2014). Interkulturelle Synergie als „ausgehandelte“ Interkulturalität: Der deutsch-französische Fernsehsender ARTE. In A. Moosmüller & J. Möller-Kiero (Hrsg.), Interkulturalität und kulturelle Diversity (S. 155–181). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmeyer, C., & Franklin, P. (2016). Intercultural managment: A case-based approch to achieving complementarity and Synergy. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmeyer, C., & Öttl, S. (2011). Interkulturalisierung nationaler Mediensysteme? ARTE als Laboratorium für grenzüberschreitenden Medienwandel. In Institut für interdisziplinäre Medienforschung (IfIM) (Hrsg.), Medien und Wandel (S. 129–160). Berlin: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In M. Paige (Hrsg.), Education for the intercultural experience (S. 21–71). Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. J. (2001). Developing intercultural competence for global leadership. In R.-D. Reineke & C. Fussiger (Hrsg.), Intercultural management: Theory, consulting, training (S. 206–225). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. M. (2014). Intercultural competence: Vital perspectives for diversity and inclusion. In B. M. Ferdman & B. Deane (Hrsg.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion (S. 155–228). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. M., & Bennett, M. J. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity. An integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In D. Landis, J. M. Bennett, & M. J. Bennett (Hrsg.), Handbook of intercultural training (S. 147–165). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist, C. (1999). Equal democracies? Gender and politics in the Nordic countries. Oslo: Scandinavia University Press and Nordic Council of Ministers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolten, J. (2001). Interkulturelle Kompetenz. Erfurt: Thüringer Landeszentrale für politische Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, M. Y., & Salk, J. (2000). Partnering across borders: Negotiating organizational culture in a German-Japanese joint venture. Human Relations, 52(4), 451–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás, M., & Smircich, L. (1996). From the woman’s point of view: Feminist approaches to organization studies. In S. Clegg (Hrsg.), Handbook of organization studies (S. 218–257). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanlat, J.-F., Dameron, S., Dupuis, J.-P., Ester de Freitas, M., & Ozbilgin, M. (2013). Management et diversité : Lignes de tension et perspectives. Management International, 17, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevrier, S. (2009). Is national culture still relevant to management in a global context? The case of Switzerland. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(2), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2009). Gender (2. Aufl). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. (1994). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Iribarne, P. (1989). La logique de l’honneur. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Iribarne, P. (2009). National cultures and organizations in search of a theory: An interpretative approach International. Journal of Cross-cultural Management, 9(3), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Iribarne, P. (2012). Managing corporate values in diverse national cultures: The challenge of differences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7(2), 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. (2003). Organization theory as a positivist science. In H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (S. 39–62). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essers, C., Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Female ethnicity: Understanding Muslim immigrant businesswomen in the Netherlands Gender. Work & Organization, 17(3), 320–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdman, B. M., & Deane, B. R. (Hrsg.). (2014). Diversity at work – The practice of inclusion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdman, B. M., & Sagiv, L. (2012). Diversity in organizations and cross-cultural work psychology: What if they were more connected? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(3), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fougère, M., & Moulettes, A. (2012). Disclaimers, dichotomies and disappearances in international business textbooks: A postcolonial deconstruction. Management Learning, 43(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genkova, P. (2003). Individualismus/Kollektivismus und hilfreiches Verhalten. Interkultureller Vergleich zwischen Bulgarien und Deutschland. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genkova, P. (2012). Kulturvergleichende Psychologie. Ein Forschungsleitfaden. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gertsen, M. C. (1990). Intercultural competence and expatriates. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1(3), 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst, W., Wiseman, R., & Hammer, M. (1977). Determinants of a sojourner’s attitudinal satisfaction. A path model. In B. Ruben (Hrsg.), Communication yearbook I (S. 415–525). New Brunswick: Transaction-International Communication Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, S., & Leonard, P. (2001). Gender, power and organisations. Houndmills: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In L. J. Nicholson (Hrsg.), Feminism/Postmodernism (S. 190–233). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., & Klein, K. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. J., & Yanow, D. (2003). Organization theory as an interpretive science. In H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (S. 63–87). Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, V. R. (2014). Communicating about diversity and inclusion. In B. M. Ferdman & B. Deane (Hrsg.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion (S. 55–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, V. R., & Russell, A. M. (1997). The diversity directive: Why some initiatives fail & what to do about it. Madison: ASTD/American Society for Training and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headland, T., Pike, K., & Harris, M. (Hrsg.). (1990). Emic and etic. The insider/outsider-debate. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2. Aufl). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holvino, E., & Kamp, A. (2009). Diversity management: Are we moving in the ‚right‘ direction? Reflections from both sides of the North Atlantic. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(4), 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Hrsg.). (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 285–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1953). Universal categories of culture. In A. L. Krober (Hrsg.), Anthropology today (S. 507–523). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston/New York: Row, Peterson and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühnel, P. (2014). Kulturstandards – woher sie kommen und wie sie wirken. Interculture Journal, 13(22), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, D., & Bhagat, R. (Hrsg.). (1996). Handbook of intercultural training. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H., Maznevski, M., DiStefano, J., & Dietz, J. (2009). International management behavior. Leading with a global mindset (6. Aufl). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorbiecki, A., & Jack, G. (2000). Critical turns in the evolution of diversity management. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E. (2013). Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardon, L., & Steers, R. M. (2009). The culture theory jungle: Divergence and convergence in models of national culture. In R. S. Bhagat & R. M. Steers (Hrsg.), Cambridge handbook of culture organizations and work (S. 3–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412–1426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorp, A., & Steyaert, C. (2009). How different can differences be(come)? Interpretative repertoires of diversity concepts in Swiss-based organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(4), 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, K. (Hrsg.). (1954). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilhofer, K. (2011). Cultural knowledge. A critical perspective on the concept as a foundation for respect for cultural differences. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, A. (2009). Contesting hegemony through genealogy. Foucault and cross cultural management research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(3), 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primecz, H., Romani, L., & Sackmann, S. (2009). Multiple perspectives in cross-cultural management. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 9(3), 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primecz, H., Romani, L., & Sackmann, S. (Hrsg.). (2011). Cross-cultural management in practice: Culture and negotiated meanings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primecz, H., Romani, L., & Topçu, K. (2015). A multi-paradigm analysis of cross-cultural encounters. In N. Holden, S. Michailova, & S. Tietze (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to cross-cultural management (S. 431–439). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risberg, A., & Søderberg, A. M. (2008). Translating a management concept: Diversity management in Denmark. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23(6), 426–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romani, L. (2010). Relating to the other: Paradigm interplay for cross-cultural management research (2. Aufl). Saarbrücken: LAP publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romani, L., Primecz, H., & Topçu, K. (2011). Paradigm interplay for theory development: A methodological example with the Kulturstandard method. Organizational Research Methods, 14(3), 432–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romani, L., Primecz, H., & Bell, R. (2014). There is nothing so practical as four good theories. In B. Gehrke & M. T. Claes (Hrsg.), Global leadership practices: A cross-cultural management perspective (S. 13–47). Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romani, L., Holck, L., Holgersson, C., & Muhr, S.-L. (in 2015 erscheinend). Diversity management in Denmark and Sweden. In J. F. Chanlat & M. Özbilgin (Hrsg.), Management & diversity, Main ascertainments in different countries. London: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioural components of attitudes. In C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg (Hrsg.), Attitude organisation and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (S. 1–14). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackmann, S. A., & Phillips, M. E. (2004). Contextual influences on culture research: Shifting assumptions for new workplace realities. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 4(3), 370–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Salazar, M., & Gelfand, M. (2013). Understanding diversity as culture. In Q. M. Roberson (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of diversity and work (S. 32–51). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K., & Thoroughgood, C. (2012). Culture doesn’t just intersect with diversity, culture defines diversity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(3), 346–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlie, H.-W. (2011). Interkulturelle Kommunikation in einer deutsch-französischen Organisation. Der Europäische Kulturkanal ARTE. In C. Barmeyer, P. Genkova, & J. Scheffer (Hrsg.), Interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kulturwissenschaft. Grundbegriffe, Wissenschaftsdisziplinen, Kulturräume (S. 519–532). Stutz: Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., Stahl, G., & Barsoux, J.-L. (2014). Managing across cultures (3. Aufl). London: Prentice Hall Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroll-Machl, S. (2001). Aspekte amerikanischer und deutscher Unternehmenskulturen im Vergleich. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 3, 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (2005). Body and management pedagogy Gender. Work & Organization, 12(1), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Søderberg, A.-M., & Holden, N. J. (2002). Rethinking cross-cultural management in a globalising business world. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B., & Chagnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In D. Deardorff (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of intercultural competence (S. 2–52). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Rowney, J., & Steel, P. (2009). Half a century of measuring culture: Review of approaches, challenges, and limitations based on the analysis of 121 instruments for quantifying culture. Journal of International Management, 15(4), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatli, A., Vassilopoulou, J., Al Ariss, A., & Özbilgin, M. (2012). The role of regulatory and temporal context in the construction of diversity discourses: The case of the UK, France and Germany. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18, 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (2003a). Kultur und Kulturstandards. In A. Thomas, E.-U. Kinast, & S. Schroll-Machl (Hrsg.), Handbuch Interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kooperation (S. 19–31). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (2003b). Interkulturelle Kompetenz. Grundlagen, Probleme und Konzepte. Erwägen Wissen Ethik, Diskussionseinheit: Interkulturelle Kompetenz – Grundlagen Probleme und Konzepte, 14(1), 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (2005). Grundlagen der interkulturellen Psychologie. Nordhausen: Traugott Bautz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (2011). Das Kulturstandardkonzept. In W. Dreyer & U. Hößler (Hrsg.), Perspektiven interkultureller Kompetenz (S. 97–124). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A., Kinast, E.-U., & Schroll-Machl, S. (Hrsg.). (2003). Handbuch Interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kooperation (Bd. 1 & 2). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topçu, K. (2005). Theory and practice of culture standard research in Austro-Hungarian management interactions: An analysis from the Hungarian point of view. PhD Dissertation, Budapest: Corvinus University of Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topçu, K., Romani, L., & Primecz, H. (2007). Kulturstandard research in two paradigms: The possible applications of the method in the functionalist and interpretive paradigms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management, 5, 161–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1904). Die ‚Objektivität‘ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In M. Weber (Hrsg.), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (S. 146–214). Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, R., & Jack, G. (2008). The US commercial-military-political complex and the emergence of international business and management studies. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(4), 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettermark, A. (2014). Tales of transformation: Expatriate encounters with local contexts: A postcolonial reading. PhD Dissertation, Stockholm: US-AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (2003). Organization theory as a critical science? In H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (S. 88–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ybema, S. B., & Byun, H. (2009). Cultivating cultural differences in asymmetric power relations. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 9(3), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Barmeyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this entry

Cite this entry

Barmeyer, C., Romani, L., Pilhofer, K. (2016). Welche Impulse liefert interkulturelles Management für Diversity Management?. In: Genkova, P., Ringeisen, T. (eds) Handbuch Diversity Kompetenz: Gegenstandsbereiche. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08932-0_3-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08932-0_3-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08932-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Welche Impulse liefert interkulturelles Management für Diversity Management?
    Published:
    18 February 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08932-0_3-2

  2. Original

    Welche Impulse liefert interkulturelles Management für Diversity Management?
    Published:
    11 January 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08932-0_3-1