Skip to main content

Pragmatist Foundations for Organizational Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbuch Organisationspädagogik
  • 215 Accesses

Abstract

Organizational education, starting with John Dewey’s pragmatism, focuses on learners in their workplace and organization. Learning is ontological and is based on the learner as being someone, a worker or a manager. Thus, it should not only be understood as a matter of acquiring skills and knowledge. This requires further that the context of work, the workplace and the organization, is also included in the concept of organizational education, which in turn involves the consideration of the different positions of power in enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argyris, Chris, and Donald A. Schön. 1978/1974. Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, Chris, and Donald A. Schön. 1996. Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. 1970. Notes on the concept of commitment. In Sociological work. Method and substance, ed. Howard S. Becker, 261–273. Chicago: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard J. 1967/1966. John Dewey. Ed. Arthur W. Brown, The great American thinkers series. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, Gert J.J., and Nicholas C. Burbules. 2003. In Pragmatism and educational research. Philosophy, theory, and educational research series, ed. Nicholas C. Burbules. Lanham/Boulder/New York/Toronto/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandi, Ulrik, and Bente Elkjaer. 2013. Organizational learning: Knowing in organizing. In American pragmatism and organization. Issues and controversies, ed. Mihaela Kelemen and Nick Rumens, 147–161. Dorchester: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E. 1991. Social worlds/Arenas theory as organizational theory. In Social organization and social process. Essays in the honor of Anselm Strauss, ed. David R. Maines, 119–158. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard M., and James G. March. 1992/1963. A behavioral theory of the firm, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1925/1958. Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1949/1938. Logic. The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1969/1890a. Is logic a dualistic science? In The early works of John Dewey, 1882–1898, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, 75–82. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1969/1890b. The logic of verification. In The early works of John Dewey, 1882–1898, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, 83–89. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1969/1891. The present position of logical theory. In The early works of John Dewey, 1882–1898, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, 125–141. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1980/1916. Democracy and education. In The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, 1–370. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1988/1938. Experience and education. In The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, 1–62. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John, and Arthur F. Bentley. 1991/1949. Knowing and the known. In The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, 1–294. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, Bente. 2001. The learning organization: An undelivered promise. Management Learning 32(4): 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, Bente. 2003. Organizational learning with a pragmatic slant. International Journal of Lifelong Education 22(5): 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, Bente, and Marleen Huysman. 2008. Social worlds theory and the power of tension. In The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organisation, ed. Daved Barry and Hans Hansen, 170–177. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, Bente, and Anne-Grete Lysgaard. 2002/1998. Med læreprocessens blik. En undersøgelse af konsulentprojekter i mindre virksomheder [With the gaze of the learning process. Researching consultancy projects in small enterprises]. København: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, Bente, and Bjarne Wahlgren. 2006. Organizational learning and workplace learning – Similarities and differences. In Learning, working and living. Mapping the terrain of working life learning, ed. Elena Antonacopoulou, Peter Jarvis, Vibeke Andersen, Bente Elkjaer, and Steen Høyrup, 15–32. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, Karen, Andrew Sturdy, Robin Fincham, and Timothy Clark. 2006. Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. The Journal of Management Studies 43(3): 641–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., and Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, Victoria J., and Karen E. Watkins. 1997. Lessons from informal and incidental learning. In Management learning. Integrating perspectives in theory and practice, ed. John Burgoyne and Michael Reynolds, 295–311. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, Carol. 2013. Education and the pragmatic temperament. In The Cambridge companion to pragmatism, ed. Alan Malachowski, 249–271. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, Dorthe, and Jean Hartley. 2008. The changing context of public leadership and management: Implications for roles and dynamics. International Journal of Public Sector Management 21(4): 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 2009. From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Ed. Hans Heinrich Gerth and Charles Wright Mills. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bente Elkjaer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this entry

Cite this entry

Elkjaer, B. (2018). Pragmatist Foundations for Organizational Education. In: Göhlich, M., Schröer, A., Weber, S. (eds) Handbuch Organisationspädagogik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07746-4_24-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07746-4_24-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-07746-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-07746-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Erziehungswissenschaft und Soziale Arbeit

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Pragmatist Foundations for Organizational Education
    Published:
    26 October 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07746-4_24-2

  2. Original

    Pragmatistische Grundlagen der Organisationspädagogik
    Published:
    18 November 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07746-4_24-1