Abstract
Understanding how to move with the times and build curricula that use mobile technologies has been an emerging challenge for educators worldwide. This chapter explores not only the efficacy of mobile technologies in delivering online curricula but considers how you may use mobile Information Technology (IT) devices in class to enhance face-to-face teaching. This chapter presents the argument that students still require some focused attention; hence there is a danger of overusing mobile devices for online delivery, yet, with careful tutoring, the use of mobile devices can in fact enhance pedagogical outcomes in courses that require continual updating and benefit from the exploration of case studies.
References
Alexander, S., and McKenzie, J. 1998. An evaluation of information technology projects for university learning. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, AGPS.
Castleford, J., and Robinson, G. 1998. Evaluating IT-Based Resources for Supporting Learning and Teaching in Geography: Some case studies, Journal of Geography in Higher Education 22(3):375–381.
Chinyio, Ezekiel, and Nick Morton. 2006. The effectiveness of e-learning. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 2: 73–86.
Conole, Grainne, Martin Dyke, and Jane Seale. 2004. Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education 43(1–2): 17–33.
Dennen, Vanessa, and Shunag Hao. 2014. Intentionally mobile pedagogy: The M-COPE framework for mobile learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 23(3): 397–419.
Enrique, Judith Guevarra. 2011. Tug-o-Where: Situating mobilities of learning (t) here. Learning, Media and Technology 36(1): 39–53.
Geddes, Simon. 2004. M-learning in the C21st: Benefits for learners. Available at http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edition06_simon-geddes.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2015.
Graham, David, and Jane McNeil. 1999. Using the internet as part of directed learning in social geography: Developing web pages as an introduction to local social geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 23(2): 181–194.
Hwang, Gwo Jen, Po. Han Wu, Ya. Yen Zhunag, and Yeuh Min Huang. 2013. Effects of the inquiry based mobile students. Interactive Learning Environment 21(4): 338–354.
Kirkwood, Aidan, and Linda Price. 2005. Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education 30(3): 257–274.
Koole, M.L. 2009. A model for framing mobile learning. In Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training, ed. M. Ally, 25–47. Athabasca: Lawrence Endhaum Associates.
Lynch, Kenneth, Bob Bednarz, James Boxail, Lex Chalmers, Derek France, and Julie Kesby. 2008. E-learning for geography’s teaching and learning spaces. Journal of Teaching Geography in Higher Education 32(1): 135–149.
Martin, David, and Richard Treves. 2007. Embedding e-learning in geographical practice. British Journal of Educational Technology 38(5): 773–783.
Motiwalla, L. 2007. Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education 49: 581–596.
Nursey-Bray, Melissa, and Tony Miller. 2012. Chapter 17: Ports and climate change: Building skills in climate change adaptation, Australia. In Climate change and the sustainable use of water resources, ed. W. Filho, 273–283. Heidelberg: Springer.
Rennie, F., and T. Morrison. 2012. e-Learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. New York: Routledge.
Rich, D.C., Pitman, A.J. and Gosper, M.V. 2000. Integrated IT-based geography teaching and learning: A Macquarie University case study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 24(1): 116–122.
Saks, K., and Leijen, A. 2014. Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112(7) February 2014, 190–198.
Sander. P., Stevenson, K., King, M., and Coates, D. 2000. ‘University students Expectations of Teaching’ Studies in Higher Education 25, 309–323.
Sha, Li., C.-K. Looi, Wenli Chen, and Bao Hai Zhang. 2011. Understanding mobile learning from perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28: 366–378.
Sharpe, Rona, and Helen Beetham. 2010. Rethinking learning for the digital age: How learners shape their own experiences. London: Routledge.
Whalley, Brian, Angharad Saunders, Robin Lewis, Michaela Buenemann, and Paul Sutton. 2011. Curriculum development: Producing geographers for the 21st century. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 35(3): 379–393.
Zurita, G., and M. Nussbaum. 2007. A conceptual framework based on activity theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology 38: 213–235.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Crown Copyright
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nursey-Bray, M. (2015). Moving with Mobiles: Using IT in the Classroom as Against Online: A Comparative Reflection from South Australia. In: Zhang, Y. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_66-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_66-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Mobiles, Online Learning, and the Small Group Discovery Classroom: Reflections from South Australia- Published:
- 13 October 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_66-2
-
Original
Moving with Mobiles: Using IT in the Classroom as Against Online: A Comparative Reflection from South Australia- Published:
- 20 April 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_66-1