Abstract
This chapter provides an introductory discussion of spatial autocorrelation (SA), which refers to correlation existing and observed in geospatial data, and which characterizes data values that are not independent, but rather are tied together in overlapping subsets within a given geographic landscape. This chapter summarizes the various interpretations of SA, one being map pattern. SA can be quantified in a number of different ways, too, one being with the Moran Coefficient. Spatial filtering is a statistical method whose goal is to obtain enhanced and robust results in a spatial data analysis by decomposing a spatial variable into trend, a spatially structured random component (i.e., spatial stochastic signal), and random noise. Its aim is to separate spatially structured random components from both trend and random noise, and, consequently, leads statistical modeling to sounder statistical inference and useful visualization. This separation procedure can involve eigenfunctions of the matrix version of the numerator of the Moran Coefficient. This chapter summarizes the eigenvector spatial filtering (ESF) conceptual material, and presents the computer code for implementing ESF in R, Matlab, MINITAB, FORTRAN, and SAS. Next, it demonstrates that eigenvector spatial filter estimators are unbiased, efficient, and consistent. Finally, it summarizes an ESF empirical example application, and the extension of ESF to spatial interaction modeling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J Roy Stat Soc Series B 36(2):192–225
Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model 153:51–68
Chun Y (2008) Modeling network autocorrelation within migration flows by eigenvector spatial filtering. J Geogr Syst 10(4):317–344
Chun Y, Griffith DA (2009) Eigenvector selection with stepwise regression techniques to construct spatial filters. Paper presented at the annual association of american geographers meeting, Las Vegas, NV, 25 March
Chun Y, Griffith DA (2011) Modeling network autocorrelation in space-time migration flow data: an eigenvector spatial filtering approach. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(3):523–536
Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion, London
Cordy C, Griffith DA (1993) Efficiency of least squares estimators in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Commun Stat Series B 22:1161–1179
de Jong P, Sprenger C, van Veen F (1984) On extreme values of Moran’s I and Geary’s c. Geogr Anal 16:17–24
Fischer M, Griffith DA (2008) Modeling spatial autocorrelation in spatial interaction data: a comparison of spatial econometric and spatial filtering specifications. J Reg Sci 48:969–989
Flowerdew R, Aitkin M (1982) A method of fitting the gravity model based on the Poisson distribution. J Reg Sci 22:191–202
Getis A (1990) Screening for spatial dependence in regression analysis. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 69:69–81
Getis A (2010) Spatial autocorrelation. In: Fischer M, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, New York, pp 255–278
Getis A, Griffith DA (2002) Comparative spatial filtering in regression analysis. Geogr Anal 34(2):130–140
Griffith DA (1992) What is spatial autocorrelation? Reflections on the past 25 years of spatial statistics. l’Espace Géographique 21:265–280
Griffith DA (2000) Eigenfunction properties and approximations of selected incidence matrices employed in spatial analyses. Linear Algebra Appl 321:95–112
Griffith DA (2003) Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: gaining understating through theory and scientific visualization. Springer, Berlin
Griffith DA (2004) A spatial filtering specification for the autologistic model. Environ Plann A 36:1791–1811
Griffith DA (2010) The Moran coefficient for non-normal data. J Stat Plann Infer 140:2980–2990
Griffith DA (2011) Visualizing analytical spatial autocorrelation components latent in spatial interaction data: an eigenvector spatial filter approach. Comput, Environ Urban Syst 35:140–149
Haining R (1991) Bivariate correlation with spatial data. Geogr Anal 23:210–227
LeSage J, Pace R (2008) Spatial econometric modelling of origin–destination flows. J Reg Sci 48:941–967
Pace K, LeSage J, Zhu S (2011) Interpretation and computation of estimates from regression models using spatial filtering. Paper presented to the Vth world conference of the spatial econometrics association, Toulouse, FR, 6–8 July
Patuelli R, Griffith DA, Tiefelsdorf M, Nijkamp P (2011) Spatial filtering and eigenvector stability: space-time model for German unemployment data. Int Reg Sci Rev 34:235–280
Portnoy S (1984) Asymptotic behavior of M estimators of p regression parameters when p2/n is large: I. consistency. Ann Stat 12:1298–1309
Tiefelsdorf M, Boots BN (1995) The exact distribution of Moran’s I. Environ Plann A 27:985–999
Tiefelsdorf M, Griffith DA (2007) Semi-parametric filtering of spatial autocorrelation: the eigenvector approach. Environ Plann A 39:1193–1221
Tobler W (1969) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Paper prepared for the meeting of the international geographical union, commission on quantitative methods, Ann Arbor, Michigan, August; published in 1970, Economic Geography 46(2) 234–240
Tobler W (1975) Linear operators applied to areal data. In: Davis J, McCullagh M (eds) Display and analysis of spatial data. Wiley, New York, pp 14–37
Wilson A (1967) A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transport Res 1:253–269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A
Appendix A
The relationship between the MC and a squared product moment correlation coefficient (r2).
MC can be derived as a linear regression solution:
From OLS theory: b = (X T X)−1 X T Y
-
(i)
Convert the attribute variable in question to z-scores
-
(ii)
Let X = z Y and Y = Cz Y
-
(iii)
Regress Cz Y on z Y, with a no-intercept option
-
(iv)
Let X = 1 and Y = C1
-
(v)
Regress C1 on 1, with a no-intercept option
-
(vi)
MC = bnumerator/bdenominator
This relationship relates directly to the Moran scatterplot, conveying why it is a useful visualization of spatial autocorrelation.
Next, let MC = (n /1 T C1) z T Cz/(n−1) and rewrite vector z as the following bivariate regression model specification: z = a1 + bCZ + e, where e is an n-by-1 vector of residuals. Then
where MC1 denotes the maximum value of MC for a given spatial weight matrix C. For a large P-by-Q regular square lattice (i.e., n = PQ) and the rook’s adjacency definition, for which \( \mathrm{ M}{{\mathrm{ C}}_1} \approx 1 \), if MC = 0.25, then
and, consequently, \( {{\mathrm{ r}}^2} \approx 0.05 \). Therefore, roughly 5% of the variance in a spatially autocorrelation random variable with MC = 0.25 is attributable to spatial autocorrelation.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Griffith, D., Chun, Y. (2014). Spatial Autocorrelation and Spatial Filtering. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_72
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_72
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23429-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23430-9
eBook Packages: Business and Economics