Skip to main content

CT/MRI Safety in Functional Neurosurgery

  • Reference work entry
Textbook of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
  • 307 Accesses

Abstract

Unique and ever-changing applications of imaging technologies have played an integral role in transforming the landscape of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery [1]. Both computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imagery (MRI) continue to push forward the boundaries of image-guided neurological surgery. Despite the great benefits offered by CT and MRI, however, each technique poses certain risks to the safety of patients and, in some cases, of healthcare workers [24].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ross PJ, Ashamalla H, Rafla S. Advances in stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic radiation therapy. Radiation Therapist 2001;10(1):57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Segal AJ, Ellis JH, Baumgartner BR. ACR manual on contrast media. 6th ed. Reston, VA: ACR; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357(22):2277–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung SM. Safety issues in magnetic resonance imaging. State of the art. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 2002;22(1):35–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coursey CA, Frush DP. CT and radiation: what radiologists should know. Appl Radiol 2008;37(3):22–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nagataki S. Comment on: computed tomography and radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357(22):2277–84. N Engl J Med 2008;358(8):850-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tubiana M. Computed tomography and radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2008;358(8):850;author reply 852–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Frush DP, Yoshizumi T, Varchena V, Poe SA, Lucaya J. In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(2):407–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J, Jr, Huda W. Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25(5):900–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bauman G, Wong E, McDermott M. Fractionated radiotherapy techniques. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2006;17(2):99–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Valk J. The role of CT and NMRI in neurosurgical diagnosis. Neurosurg Rev 1986;9(1–2):43–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolf GL, Arenson RL, Cross AP. A prospective trial of ionic vs. nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effect. Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:939–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lasser EC, Berry CC, Talner LB, Santini LC, Lang EK, Gerber FH, Stolberg HO. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med 1987;317(14):845–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology 1990;175(3):621–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M. The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 1991;156(4):825–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rezai AR, Baker K, Tkach J, Phillips M, Hrdlicka G, Sharan A, Nyenhuis J, Ruggieri P, Henderson J, Shellock FG. Is magnetic resonance imaging safe for patients with neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation (DBS)? Neurosurgery 2005;57:1056–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004;232(3):635–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG, Jr, Froelich JW, Gilk T, Gimbel JR, Gosbee J, Kuhni-Kaminski E, Lester JW, Jr, Nyenhuis J, Parag Y, Schaefer DJ, Sebek-Scoumis EA, Weinreb J, Zaremba LA, Wilcox P, Lucey L, Sass N. ACR Blue Ribbon Panel on MR safety. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(6):1447–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Henderson JM, Tkach J, Phillips M, Baker K, Shellock FG, Rezai AR. Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson’s disease: case report. Neurosurgery 2005;57(5):E1063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stecco A, Saponaro A, Carriero A. Patient safety issues in magnetic resonance imaging: state of the art [Article in English, Italian]. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007;112(4):491–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shellock F. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14(3):295–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Joint Commission. Sentinel event MRI safety alert. Preventing accidents and injuries in the MRI suite. Issue 38, February 14, 2008. http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_19.htm Accessed 20 May 08.

  23. Shellock FG, Crues JV. Commentary: MR safety and the American college of radiology white paper. Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1349–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chewning RH, Murphy KJ. Gadolinium-based contrast media and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal insufficiency. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007;18(3):331–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Broome DR, Girguis MS, Baron PW, Cottrell AC, Kjellin I, Kirk GA. Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(2):586–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinreb JC. Improving gadolinium-based contrast safety. Imaging Biz.com 2008;3(2):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Schulder, M., Oubré, A. (2009). CT/MRI Safety in Functional Neurosurgery. In: Lozano, A.M., Gildenberg, P.L., Tasker, R.R. (eds) Textbook of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69960-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69960-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69959-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69960-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics