Summary
A brief survey is given of the state of art of NMRI in neurosurgical diagnosis and its advantages and disadvantages in comparison to CT scanning are discussed. Specificity and sensitivity of these methods are also considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Koutcher, J. A., M. Goldsmith, R. Damadian: A malignancy-index to discriminate normal and cancerous tissue. Cancer 41 (1978) 174–182
Mills, C. M., L. E. Crooks, L. Kaufmann, M. Brant-Zawadzki: Cerebral abnormalities: use of calculated T1 and T2 magnetic resonance images for diagnosis. Radiology 150 (1984) 87–94
New, P. J. F., B. R. Rosen, T. J. Brady, F. S. Buonanno, J. P. Kistler, C. T. Burt, W. S. Hinshaw, J. H. Newhouse, G. M. Pohost, J. M. Taveras: Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in NMRI. Radiology 147 (1983) 139–148
Valk, J., C. MacLean, P. R. Algra: Basic principles of NMR. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1985
Young, I. R., M. Burl, G. J. Clarke, A. S. Hall, T. Pasmore, A. G. Collins, D. T. Smith, J. S. Orr, G. M. Bydder, F. H. Doyle, R. H. Greenspan, R. E. Steiner: Magnetic resonance properties of hydrogen. Imaging of the posterior fossa. AJR 137 (1981) 895–901
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valk, J. The role of CT and NMRI in neurosurgical diagnosis. Neurosurg. Rev. 9, 43–47 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743053
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743053