Skip to main content

Blade Runner as Philosophy: The Replicants Are Us (Almost)

The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy
  • 759 Accesses

Abstract

Thanks to its brilliant melding of film noir, science fiction, and cyberpunk motifs, not to mention its stirring music and unprecedented visual density, Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (1982/2007) has become an influential cultural icon. What really sets the film apart from most movies, however, are the ways in which it encourages philosophical questions. Virtually all commentators agree that “What does it mean to be human?” – understood as asking something like, “What characterizes the real (or authentic) human being?” – is the central philosophical question the film raises. Attempting to answer that question can be a fertile approach to the film, with moral implications for how to think about the qualifications for inclusion in the human community. That is not, however, the only way to appreciate the philosophical significance of Blade Runner. The film also encourages viewers to ponder the question, “What fundamental experiences constitute the uniquely human mode of self-consciousness?” Showing how the latter question leads to a richer appreciation of Blade Runner as philosophy is the aim of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, Nathan. 2005. Is film the alien other to philosophy? Philosophy as film in Mulhall’s On Film. Film and Philosophy 9: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, Judith. 2009. Blade Runner and Sartre: The boundaries of humanity. In The philosophy of Neo-Noir, ed. M.T. Conard, 21–34. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukatman, Scott. 2012. Blade runner. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noel. 2006. Philosophizing through the moving image: The case of Serene Velocity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1): 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The world viewed: Reflections on the ontology of film, enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coplan, Amy, and David Davies, eds. 2015. Blade runner. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. 1998. Discourse on method, and Meditations on first philosophy. 4th ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Philip K. 1980. Philip K. Dick on philosophy: A brief interview. In The shifting realities of Philip K. Dick: Selected literary and philosophical writings, ed. L. Sutin, 44–47. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francavilla, Joseph. 1997. The android as Doppelgänger. In Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick’s Do androids dream of electric sheep? ed. Judith B. Kerman, 2nd ed., 4–15. Bowling Green: Bowling Green University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerman, Judith B., ed. 1997. Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick’s Do androids dream of electric sheep? 2nd ed. Bowling Green: Bowling Green University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, Laurence F., and Andrea F. Kulas, eds. 2005. Ridley Scott: Interviews. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, William M. 1997. Script to screen: Blade Runner in perspective. In Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick’s Do androids dream of electric sheep? ed. J.B. Kerman, 2nd ed., 132–153. Bowling Green: Bowling Green University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, Paisley. 2006. Theses on cinema as philosophy. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1): 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1690. An essay concerning human understanding, 2 Vols. New York: Dover Publications, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. The film and the new psychology. In Sense and non-sense, 48–59. Trans. H. Dreyfus, and P. Dreyfus. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Rachela. 1990. Casablanca meets Star Wars: The Blakean dialectics of Blade Runner. Literature Film Quarterly 18 (1): 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, Stephen. 1994. Picturing the human (Body and soul): A reading of Blade Runner. Film and Philosophy 1: 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. On film. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pate, Anthony. 2009. Nietzsche’s Übermensch in the hyperreal flux: An analysis of Blade Runner, Fight Club, and Miami Vice. Dissertations and Graduate Research Overview, Paper 15. http://digitalcommons.ric.edu/etd/15. Accessed 12 Aug 2019.

  • Peary, Danny. 1984. Directing Alien and Blade Runner: An interview with Ridley Scott. In Ridley Scott: Interviews, ed. L.F. Knapp and A.F. Kulas, 42–55. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, Sean. 2008. Studying Blade Runner. Leighton Buzzard: Auteur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bruce. 2000. The philosophical limits of film. Film and Philosophy (Special Interest Edition on the Films of Woody Allen): 163–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamoff, Paul J. 2018. Why the theatrical cut is the truest version of Blade Runner. In The Cyberpunk Nexus: Exploring the Blade Runner universe, ed. L. Tambone and J. Bongiorno, 100–110. Edwardsville: Sequart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammon, Paul M. 1982. The arts. Omni 4 (8): 24, 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Future Noir: The making of Blade Runner (revised & updated edition). New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, Timothy. 2014. Philosophy and Blade Runner. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. What am I to you? In Blade Runner 2049: A philosophical exploration, ed. T. Shanahan and P. Smart, 228–247. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Murray. 2006. Film, art, argument, and ambiguity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1): 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg, Thomas E. 2006. Beyond mere illustration: How films can be philosophy. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1): 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Shanahan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Shanahan, T. (2020). Blade Runner as Philosophy: The Replicants Are Us (Almost). In: The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    as Philosophy: What Does It Mean to Be Human?
    Published:
    05 October 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-3

  2. as Philosophy: What Does It Mean to Be Human?
    Published:
    05 August 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-2

  3. Original

    as Philosophy: The Replicants Are Us (Almost)
    Published:
    06 November 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-1