Abstract
Contact allergy to protective gloves is common, especially in occupational settings, and should be considered in all patients with hand dermatitis. Leather gloves are a significant cause of allergic contact dermatitis due to chromium. Rubber gloves induce contact allergy by two mechanisms: immediate and delayed contact allergy. Immediate allergy manifests as contact urticaria or protein contact dermatitis. It is due to proteins of natural rubber latex (NRL) that are only present in NRL gloves, not in gloves made of synthetic rubber (e.g., nitrile). NRL allergy has become quite rare in many developed countries. All rubber gloves, made of either NRL or synthetic rubber, may induce contact allergy due to various rubber additives. Thiurams, dithiocarbamates, and benzothiazoles are the main sensitizing additives in rubber gloves. NRL contact urticaria is diagnosed by prick testing or determination of specific IgE in the serum. The diagnosis of delayed glove allergy requires patch testing. The European baseline series contains the main sensitizers. When rubber glove allergy is suspected, it is recommendable to perform aimed testing with a rubber additive series and using pieces of the suspected glove material. Plastic glove allergy is not extremely rare, and most reported cases have been due to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) gloves. The diagnosis of plastic glove allergy is difficult. Commercial patch test preparations only rarely reveal the allergen, and the diagnosis usually requires patch testing with the individual chemicals in the gloves.
References
Oreskov KW, Sosted H, Johansen JD (2015) Glove use among hairdressers: difficulties in the correct use of gloves among hairdressers and the effect of education. Contact Dermatitis 72:362–366
Estlander T, Jolanki R (2005) Allergic contact dermatitis from rubber and plastic gloves. In: Boman A, Estlander T, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Protective gloves for occupational use, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 127–144
Flores SK, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Maibach HI (2012) Disadvantages of gloves. In: Rustemayer T, Elsner P, John SM, Maibach HI (eds) Kanerva’s occupational dermatology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 1923–1933
Caroe C, Andersen KE, Thyssen JP, Mortz CG (2010) Fluctuations in the prevalence of chromate allergy in Denmark and exposure to chrome-tanned leather. Contact Dermatitis 63:340–346
Hedberg YS, Erfani B, Matura M, Liden C (2018) Chromium(III) release from chromium-tanned leather elicits allergic contact dermatitis: a use test study. Contact Dermatitis 78:307–314
Goodier MC, Ronkainen SD, Hylwa SA (2018) Rubber accelerators in medical examination and surgical gloves. Dermatitis 29:66–76
Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W, Schnuch A, Information Network of Departments Of D (2003) Occupational rubber glove allergy: results of the information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK), 1995–2001. Contact Dermatitis 48:39–44
Friis UF, Johansen JD, Krongaard T, Menne T (2011) Quantitative assessment of diethylthiourea exposure in two cases of occupational allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 64:116–118
Ponten A, Hamnerius N, Bruze M, Hansson C, Persson C, Svedman C, Thorneby Andersson K, Bergendorff O (2013) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by sterile non-latex protective gloves: clinical investigation and chemical analyses. Contact Dermatitis 68:103–110
Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Estlander T, Jolanki R (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from bisphenol A in PVC gloves. Contact Dermatitis 49:202–205
Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Jolanki R (2006) Antimicrobial allergy from polyvinyl chloride gloves. Arch Dermatol 142:1326–1330
Aalto-Korte K, Suuronen K (2017) Patterns of concomitant allergic reactions in patients suggest cross-sensitization between octylisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis 77:385–389
Crepy MN, Langlois E, Melin S, Descatha A, Bensefa-Colas L, Jonathan AM, Ameille J (2014) Tricresyl phosphate in polyvinylchloride gloves: a new allergen. Contact Dermatitis 70:325–328
Ponten A (2006) Formaldehyde in reusable protective gloves. Contact Dermatitis 54:268–271
Allmers H, Schmengler J, John SM (2004) Decreasing incidence of occupational contact urticaria caused by natural rubber latex allergy in German health care workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114:347–351
Blaabjerg MS, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C, Mortz CG (2015) Decrease in the rate of sensitization and clinical allergy to natural rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis 73:21–28
Rose RF, Lyons P, Horne H, Mark Wilkinson S (2009) A review of the materials and allergens in protective gloves. Contact Dermatitis 61:129–137
Aalto-Korte K, Pesonen M (2016) Patterns of simultaneous patch test reactions to thiurams and dithiocarbamates in 164 patients. Contact Dermatitis 75:353–357
Geier J, Uter W, Schnuch A, Brasch J, German Contact Dermatitis Research G, Information Network of Departments Of D (2002) Diagnostic screening for contact allergy to mercaptobenzothiazole derivatives. Am J Contact Dermat 13:66–70
Van Kampen V, De Blay F, Folletti I, Kobierski P, Moscato G, Olivieri M, Quirce S, Sastre J, Walusiak-Skorupa J, Kotschy-Lang N, Musken H, Mahler V, Schliemann S, Ochmann U, Sultz J, Worm M, Sander I, Zahradnik E, Bruning T, Merget R, Raulf-Heimsoth M (2013) Evaluation of commercial skin prick test solutions for selected occupational allergens. Allergy 68:651–658
Turjanmaa K, Reunala T, Rasanen L (1988) Comparison of diagnostic methods in latex surgical glove contact urticaria. Contact Dermatitis 19:241–247
Sheeran C, Cahill J, Nixon R (2014) Glove-related hand urticaria caused by disposable gloves in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 71:115–116
Uter W, Warburton K, Weisshaar E, Simon D, Ballmer-Weber B, Mahler V, Fuchs T, Geier J, Wilkinson M (2016) Patch test results with rubber series in the European surveillance system on contact allergies (ESSCA), 2013/14. Contact Dermatitis 75:345–352
Hansson C, Ponten A, Svedman C, Bergendorff O (2014) Reaction profile in patch testing with allergens formed during vulcanization of rubber. Contact Dermatitis 70:300–308
Baeck M, Cawet B, Tennstedt D, Goossens A (2013) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by latex (natural rubber)-free gloves in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 68:54–55
Suuronen K, Pesonen M, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Aalto-Korte K (2013) Triphenyl phosphite, a new allergen in polyvinylchloride gloves. Contact Dermatitis 68:42–49
Vandevenne A, Ghys K, Dahlin J, Ponten A, Kerre S (2013) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by triphenyl phosphite in poly(vinyl chloride) gloves. Contact Dermatitis 68:181–182
Dahlin J, Bergendorff O, Vindenes HK, Hindsen M, Svedman C (2014) Triphenylguanidine, a new (old?) rubber accelerator detected in surgical gloves that may cause allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 71:242–246
Weimann S, Skudlik C, John SM (2010) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by the blue pigment VINAMON(R) Blue BX FW – a phthalocyanine blue in a vinyl glove. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 8:820–822
Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1985) Organic pigment as a cause of plastic glove dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 13:41–43
Reckling C, Engfeldt M, Bruze M (2016) Occupational nitrile glove allergy caused by pigment blue 15. Contact Dermatitis 75:189–190
Sowa J, Kobayashi H, Tsuruta D, Sugawara K, Ishii M (2005) Allergic contact dermatitis due to adipic polyester in vinyl chloride gloves. Contact Dermatitis 53:243–244
Ueno M, Adachi A, Horikawa T, Inoue N, Mori A, Sasaki K (2007) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by poly(adipic acid-co-1,2-propylene glycol) and di-(n-octyl) tin-bis(2-ethylhexylmaleate) in vinyl chloride gloves. Contact Dermatitis 57:349–351
Ito A, Imura T, Sasaki K, Kakihara K, Mori A, Ito M (2009) Allergic contact dermatitis due to mono(2-ethylhexyl) maleate in di-(n-octyl)tin-bis(2-ethylhexyl maleate) in polyvinyl chloride gloves. Contact Dermatitis 60:59–61
Bruze M, Trulsson L, Bendsöe N (1992) Patch testing with ultra-sonic bath extracts. Am J Contact Dermat 3:133–137
Crepy MN, Lecuen J, Ratour-Bigot C, Stocks J, Bensefa-Colas L (2018) Accelerator-free gloves as alternatives in cases of glove allergy in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 78:28–32
Crepy MN (2016) Rubber: new allergens and preventive measures. Eur J Dermatol 26:523–530
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Aalto-Korte, K. (2020). Contact Allergy to Protective Gloves. In: Johansen, J., Mahler, V., Lepoittevin, JP., Frosch, P. (eds) Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_74-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_74-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72451-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72451-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Contact Allergy to Protective Gloves- Published:
- 10 June 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_74-2
-
Original
Gloves- Published:
- 16 October 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_74-1