Skip to main content

Corporate Shared Value for the Wellbeing of Local Community

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Partnerships for the Goals

Definitions

Shared value can be defined as the company policies and operations that strive for achieving competitive advantage and at the same time enhancing the economic and social ramifications to the peoples where the company resides. It is a contemporary business philosophy with two-fold equally important objectives, to achieve a high business competitive level and community well-being. While the focus of Corporate Share Value is for a corporate organization to identify the social needs and to enhance both business and societal value within the supply chain and stakeholders. The participation of private corporations in community-based activities, particularly in Creating Shared Value programs, is necessary not only to create a more competitive market and improve the economic status of the disadvantaged but also to contribute to human resources and community development.

Introduction

Corporate Social Responsibility

The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) definition, based on The...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbasi A, Chung KSK, Hossain L (2012) Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position and performance. Inf Process Manag 48:671–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaeshi K, Adi BC (2006) Corporate as responsibility social deinstitutionalization of corruption in developing economies: a case study of Nigeria. Beyond CSR? In: Business, poverty and social justice conference 22 may 2006. National Liberal Club, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Amran A, Mohamed Zain M, Sulaiman M, Sarker T, Ooi SK (2013) Empowering society for better corporate social responsibility (CSR): the case of Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia 31(1):57–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari S, Munir K, Gregg T (2012) Impact at the “bottom of the pyramid”: the role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. J Manag Stud 49(4):813–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01042.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis G, Phillips HC, Lyall J (2001) Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: are they linked? Eur Bus Rev 98(1):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bečić E, Mulej EM, Švarc J (2012) Measuring social progress by sustainable development indicators: cases of Croatia and Slovenia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 37:458–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendell J (2000) Term for endearment: business, NGOs and sustainable development. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield M, Dolan CS (2014) Business as a development agent: evidence of possibility and improbability. Third World Q 35(1):22–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm A (2002) Corporate social responsibility: a complementary perspective of community and corporate leaders. Bus Soc Rev 107(2):171–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1999) Evolution of a definitional construct. Bus Soc 38(3):268–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavaye J (1989) Understanding community development. Reg Anal Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple W, Moon J (2005) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Bus Soc 44(4):415–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305281658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson MB (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):92–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp R (2008) Well-Being. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being

  • Crowther D, Aras G (2008) Corporate social responsibility. Ventus Publishing ApS, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Devinney T (2009) Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag 44–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Lucas RE, Schimmack U, Helliwell J (2009) Well-being for public policy. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334074.001.0001

  • Evans P (2002) Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’s development as freedom. Stud Comp Int Dev 37:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felício JA, Couto E, Caiado J (2014) Human capital, social capital and organizational performance. Manag Decis 52(2):350–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2013-0260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filieri R, Alguezaui S (2014) Structural social capital and innovation. Is knowledge transfer the missing link ? J Knowl Manag 18(4):728–757. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2013-0329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora C, Flora J, Spears J, Swanson L (1992) Rural communities: legacy and change. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgeard MJC, Jayawickreme E, Kern ML, Seligman MEP (2011) Doing the right thing: measuring Well-being for public policy. Int J Wellbeing 1(1):79–106. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v1i1.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper D (2010) Understanding the diversity of conceptions of well-being and quality of life. J Socioecon 39(3): 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.11.006

  • Golusin M, Ivanovic OM & Teodorovic N (2011) The review of the achieved degree of sustainable development in South Eastern Europe. The use of linear regression method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15(1): 766–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.064

  • Haniffa RM, Cooke TE (2006) The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. J Account Public Policy 24(5):391–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL (2011) Taking the green leap to the base of the pyramid. Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid: new approaches for building. Mutual Value

    Google Scholar 

  • Idemudia U, Ite U (2006) Demystifying the Niger Delta conflict: towards an integrated explanation. Rev Afr Polit Econ (109):391–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Idemudia U (2007) Community perceptions and expectations: Reinventing the wheels of corporate social responsibility practices in the Nigerian oil industry. Business & Society Review 112(3): 369–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail M (2009) Corporate social responsibility and its role in community development: an international perspective. Development 2(9):308–318. Retrieved from http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt2/sayi9pdf/ismail_maimunah.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail M, Alias SN, Mohd Rasdi R (2015) Community as stakeholder of the corporate social responsibility programme in Malaysia: outcomes in community development. Soc Respon J 11(1):109–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2013-0053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins R (2005) Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. Int Aff 81(3):525–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00467.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H, Yakovleva N (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure, (February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.10.004

  • Kok P, Mckenna R, Brown A (2001) A corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework. J Bus Ethcis 31(4):285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchinke KP (2010) Human development as a central goal for human resource development. Hum Resour Dev Int 13(5):575–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2010.520482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DZ, Whitener EM, Cross R (2006) Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: the moderating impact of relationship length. J Appl Psychol 91(5):1163–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon J (2007) The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sust Dev 15: 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.346

  • Muthuri JN (2007) Corporate citizenship and sustainable development: fostering multi-sector collaboration in the Magadi division in Kenya. J Corp Citizsh 28:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • NAR (2014) Nestlé Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.nestle.com/asset-library/documents/library/documents/annual_reports/2014-annual-report-en.pdf

  • NEAC (2010) New economic model for Malaysia. Retrieved from www.neac.gov.my

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Kramer MR (2011) Creating shared value. Harv Bus Rev 89(1/2):62–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseland M (2000) Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Elsevier Science, 54:73–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic Well-being. Annu Rev Psychol 52(1):141–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer RE (1989) Community economics. Economic structure and change in smaller communities. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanis EN, Stuart LH (2008) The base of the pyramid protocol : toward next generation BOP strategy. Ithaca, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Siwar C, Siti Haslina H (2006) A study on corporate social responsibility practices amongst business Organisations in Malaysia. Retrieved May 22 2015, from http://www.csr-weltweit.de/

  • Suza N (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility in Malaysia. Retrieved 16 June 2015, from www.oppapers.com/esays/corporate socialresponsibility-Malaysia/70764

  • The World Bank. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved 14 Feb 2016, from http://crinfo.worldbank.org/wbcrinfo/

  • UNSD (1992) United Nations conference on environment & development. In Agenda 21 United Nation Sustainable Development. United Nation, Rio de Janerio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-008-9208-3

  • Zainoddin AI, Amran A, Shaharudin MR (2020) The effect of social capital on the effectiveness of community development Programmes in Malaysia. Int J Infor Decis Sci 12(3):227–245

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Zainoddin, A.I., Shaharudin, M.R. (2020). Corporate Shared Value for the Wellbeing of Local Community. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Partnerships for the Goals. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_125-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_125-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71067-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71067-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics