Conclusion
Sen showed his usual wisdom and astute judgement in keeping his argument carefully focused and, therefore, elegant and compelling. Nonetheless, the understanding and pursuit of “development as freedom” must go beyond the arguments he lays out. As the global political economy moves with ever greater determination toward the implantation of more thoroughly marketized economic relations, analysts must correspondingly focus more closely on how to prevent market-based power inequalities from undermining “development as freedom.” Centralization of power over the cultural flows that shape preferences is a more subtle form of “unfreedom” than those which Sen highlights, but no less powerful for being subtle. Institutional strategies for facilitating collective capabilities are as important to the expansion of freedom as sustaining formal electoral institutions. Indeed, without possibilities for collective mobilization formal elections too easily become a hollow farce. Sen’s capability approach provides an invaluable analytical and philosophical foundation for those interested in pursuing development as freedom, but it is a foundation that must be built on, not just admired.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, Kenneth, 1951.Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.
—. 1963.Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Heller, Patrick. 1999.The Labor of Development: Workers and the Transformation of Capitalism in Kerala, India. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Pollock, Robert L. 1998. “The Wrong Economist Won.”Wall Street Journal, 15 October (Editorial).
Sen, Amartya. 1995. “Rationality and Social Choice.”American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 85: 1–24. [Presidential Address].
—. 1999. “The Possibility of Social Choice.”American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 89: 349–378. [Nobel Lecture].
—. 1999.Development as Freedom New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Srinivasan, T. N. 1994. “Human Development: A New Paradigm or Reinvention of the Wheel.”American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 84: 238–243.
Additional information
Peter Evans is professor in the Sociology Department at the University of California, Berkeley. His current research interests focus on globalization and global governance institutions, and their effects on ordinary citizens. He has written numerous articles and books on subjects ranging from globalization, the role of the state in industrial development, and urban environmental issues. A current project supported by the Russell Sage Foundation examines possibilities for constructing North-South links between labor movements as a strategy for increasing the bargaining power of labor movements in the global South.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, P. Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’sDevelopment as Freedom . St Comp Int Dev 37, 54–60 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686261
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686261