Skip to main content

Political Liberalism, Autonomy, and Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education
  • 1392 Accesses

Abstract

Citizens are politically autonomous insofar as they are subject to laws that are (a) justified by reasons acceptable to them and (b) authorized by them via their political institutions. An obstacle to the equal realization of political autonomy is the plurality of religious, moral, and philosophical views endorsed by citizens. Decisions regarding certain fundamental political issues (e.g., abortion) can involve citizens imposing political positions justified in terms of their respective worldviews upon others. Despite citizens’ disagreements over which worldview is correct, “political liberalism” claims that there is a form of political autonomy that is realizable within pluralist societies. (Political liberalism differs from “comprehensive liberalism” by, inter alia, being “freestanding” vis-à-vis citizens’ different worldviews.) Citizens can be politically autonomous if they enjoy equal political power and justify its exercise with “public reasons.” A political liberal education would aim at ensuring that all students can become politically autonomous citizens by teaching them how to exercise their democratic rights effectively and how to engage in public reasoning. Some political and educational theorists, however, argue that teaching students how to be politically autonomous amounts to teaching them how to be “comprehensively” autonomous. If this is so, then the distinction between political liberalism and comprehensive liberalism collapses, at least with respect to education. This chapter outlines the main elements of political liberalism, summarizes the main requirements of a political liberal citizenship education, and surveys three arguments in support of and against the thesis that a political liberal education amounts to an education for comprehensive autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benn, S. (1988). A theory of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, H. (1994). Is there any such thing as political liberalism? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 75, 318–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callan, E. (1996). Political liberalism and political education. Review of Politics, 58, 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callan, E. (1997). Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1994). A more democratic liberalism. Michigan Law Review, 92, 1503–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (2008). Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In J. Cohen, Philosophy, politics, democracy (pp. 154–180). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, V. (2011). Rawls, citizenship, and education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, S. (1995). Two kinds of respect. In R. S. Dillon (Ed.), Dignity, character, and self-respect (pp. 181–197). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, S. (2006). The second-person standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., & Neufeld, B. (2007). Political liberalism, civic education, and educational choice. Social Theory and Practice, 33, 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wijze, S. (1999). Rawls and civic education. Cogito, 13, 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ebels-Duggan, K. (2013). Moral education in the Liberal state. Journal of Practical Ethics, 1, 34–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenberg, E. (2016). Civic education: Political or comprehensive? In J. Drerup et al. (Eds.), Justice, education and the politics of childhood: Challenges and perspectives (pp. 187–206). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (1995). Civic education and social diversity. Ethics, 105, 557–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism, and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larmore, C. (1987). Patterns of moral complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larmore, C. (2008). The autonomy of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, A. (2018). The coherence of public reason. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 15, 64–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo, S. (2000). Diversity and distrust: Civic education in a multicultural democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univerity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, B. (2005). Civic respect, political liberalism, and non-liberal societies. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 4, 275–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, B. (2013). Political liberalism and citizenship education. Philosophy Compass, 8, 781–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, B. (2019). Shared intentions, public reason, and political autonomy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 49, 776–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Perfectionist liberalism and political liberalism. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39, 3–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, F. (2013). Epistemic foundations of political liberalism. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 10, 598–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quong, J. (2011). Liberalism without perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice: Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original edition 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism: Expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press. (Original edition 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (2002). Bridging liberalism and multiculturalism in American education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1968). The social contract. (trans: Cranston, M.). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, G. (2018). Political liberalism and autonomy education: Are citizenship-based arguments enough? Philosophical Studies, 175, 1071–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. (1996). Must liberal citizens be reasonable? The Review of Politics, 58, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C., & Hartley, C. (2018). Equal citizenship and public reason: A feminist political liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weithman, P. (2010). Why political liberalism? On John Rawls’s political turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weithman, P. (2011). Convergence and political autonomy. Public Affairs Quarterly, 25, 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weithman, P. (2017). Autonomy and disagreement about justice in political liberalism. Ethics, 128, 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weithman, P. (2018). In defense of a political liberalism. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 45, 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenar, L. (1995). Political liberalism: An internal critique. Ethics, 106, 32–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blain Neufeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Neufeld, B. (2020). Political Liberalism, Autonomy, and Education. In: Peterson, A., Stahl, G., Soong, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67828-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics