Constructed Wetland – A Green Approach to Handle Wastewater

  • Ashutosh Das
  • Mukesh Goel
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Natural wetlands are able to manage all local contamination by naturally occurring agents such as sunlight, aeration, biotic interaction, microbial action, precipitation, and gravitational attraction. Contaminants are removed from the system through volatilization, sedimentation, infiltration, dilution, and oxidation, among others. Constructed wetlands aim to simulate a natural wetland system through optimal configurations of wetland plant types and density, waste characteristics, flow rate, soil types, and stratification. In this way, wastewater can be effectively treated in a natural way, without heavy machinery and additional chemicals that may increase pollution. This chapter discusses the different types of constructed wetlands, the types of wetland plants, and the transformation mechanisms of major nutrients and metals in wetlands, along with suitability and limitations. Finally, the operational requirements, maintenance, and cost of a wetland system are described.

Keywords

Constructed wetland Free water surface (FWS) Vegetated submerged bed (VSB) Nutrient transformation 

References

  1. Allender BM (1984) Water quality improvement of pulp and paper mill effluents by aquatic plants. Appita 37:303–306Google Scholar
  2. American Petroleum Institute (1998) The use of treatment wetlands for petroleum industry effluents. In: Knight RL, Kadlec RH, Ohlendorf HM (eds) API publication number 4672. API Publishing Services: Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker LA (1998) Design consideration and applications for wetland treatment of high-nitrate waters. Water Sci Technol 38(1):389–395Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett KB, Harriss RC (1993) Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands. Chemosphere 26:261–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batchelor A, Scott WE, Wood A (1990) Constructed wetland research programme in South Africa. In: Cooper PF, Findlater BC (eds) Constructed wetlands in water pollution control. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benner SG, Blowes DW, Gould WD, Herbert RB, Ptacek CJ (1999) Geochemistry of a permeable reactive barrier for metals and acid mine drainage. Environ Sci Technol 33:2793–2799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birbeck AE, Reil D, Hunter R (1990) Application of natural and engineered wetlands for treatment of low-strength leachate. In: Cooper PF, Findlater BC (eds) Constructed wetlands in water pollution control. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blazejewski R, Murat-Blazejewska S (1997) Soil clogging phenomena in constructed wetlands with subsurface flow. Water Sci Technol 35(5):183–188Google Scholar
  9. Bridgham SD, Megonigal JP, Keller JK, Bliss NB, Trettin C (2006) The carbon balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands 26(4):889–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brinson M, Eckles S (2011) U.S. Department of Agriculture conservation program and practice effects on wetland ecosystem services: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 21(3):S116–S127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brix H (1994) Functions of macrophytes in constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 29(4):71–78Google Scholar
  12. Brix H (1999) How ‘green’ are aquaculture, constructed wetlands and conventional wastewater treatment systems? Water Sci Technol 40(3):45–50Google Scholar
  13. Brodie GA, Britt CR, Tomaszewski TM, Taylor HN (1993) Anoxic limestone drains to enhance performance of acid drainage treatment wetlands. In: Moshiri GA (ed) Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 129–138Google Scholar
  14. Bruland G, Richardson C (2005) Spatial variability of soil properties in created, restored, and paired natural wetlands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:273–284Google Scholar
  15. Cooper PF, Findlater BC (2013). Constructed wetlands in water pollution control: proceedings of the international conference on the use of constructed wetlands in water pollution control, held in Cambridge. Elsevier, pp 24–28, 1990Google Scholar
  16. Cooper PF, Griffin P, Humphries S, Pound A (1999) Design of a hybrid reed bed system to achieve complete nitrification and denitrification of domestic sewage. Water Sci Technol 40(3):283–289Google Scholar
  17. Craft CB, Richardson CJ (1993) Peat accretion and phosphorous accumulation along a eutrophication gradient in the Northern Everglades of Florida, United States. Biogeochemistry 22(133):156Google Scholar
  18. DeBusk WF (1999) Evaluation of a constructed wetland for treatment of leachate at a municipal landfill in northwest Florida. In: Mulamoottil G, McBean E, Roux Associates Inc. (eds) Constructed wetlands for the treatment of landfill leachates. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 175–186Google Scholar
  19. DeBusk TA, Burgoon PS, Reddy KR (1989) Secondary treatment of wastewater using floating and emergent macrophytes. In: Hammer DA (ed) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: municipal, agricultural, and industrial. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, pp 525–529Google Scholar
  20. DeBusk TA, Grace KA, Dierberg FE, Jackson SD, Chimney MJ, Gu B (2004) An investigation of the limits of phosphorus removal in wetlands: a mesocosm study of a shallow periphyton-dominated treatment system. Ecol Eng 23(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Denny P (1997) Implementation of constructed wetlands in developing countries. Water Sci Technol 35(5):27–34Google Scholar
  22. Eger P (1992) Wetland treatment for trace metal removal from mine drainage: the importance of aerobic and anaerobic processes. In: Proceedings of the wetland systems in water pollution control, 30 Nov–3 Dec 1992. Australian Water and Wastewater Association, Sydney, pp 46.1–46.9Google Scholar
  23. Eger P, Lapakko K (1989) Use of wetlands to remove nickel and copper from mine drainage. In: Hammer DA (ed) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment; municipal, industrial, and agricultural. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 780–787Google Scholar
  24. Fitch M, Burken J (2003) Constructed wetlands for metals removal, research brief #1. Midwest Hazardous Substance Research CenterGoogle Scholar
  25. Frostman T (1993) A peat/wetland approach to acidic mine drainage abatement. In: Moshiri GA (ed) Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 197–202Google Scholar
  26. García J, Ojeda E, Sales E, Chico F, Píriz T, Aguirre P, Mujeriego R (2003a) Spatial variations of temperature, redox potential, and contaminants in horizontal flow reed beds. Ecol Eng 21:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. García J, Vivar J, Aromir M, Mujeriego R (2003b) Role of hydraulic retention time and granular medium in microbial removal in tertiary treatment reed beds. Water Res 37:2645–2653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerba CP, Thurston JA, Falabi JA, Watt PM, Karpiscak MM (1999) Optimization of artificial wetland design for removal of indicator organisms and pathogenic protozoa. Water Sci Technol 40(4):363–368Google Scholar
  29. Gerke S, Baker LA, Xu Y (2001) Nitrogen transformations in a wetland receiving lagoon effluent: sequential model and implications for water reuse. Water Res 35(16):3857–3866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gersberg RM (1986) Role of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment by artificial wetlands. Water Res 20(3):363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gersberg RM, Elkins BV, Goldman CR (1984) Use of artificial wetlands to remove nitrogen from wastewater. J Water Pollut Control Fed 56:152–156Google Scholar
  32. Gersberg RM, Gearheart RA, Ives M (1989) Pathogen reduction in constructed wetlands. In: Hammer DA (ed) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment; municipal, industrial and agricultural. Lewis, Chelsea, pp 431–445Google Scholar
  33. Gleason RA, Tangen BA, Browne BA, Euliss NH (2009) Greenhouse gas flux from cropland and restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2501–2507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Green M, Gidron E, Lahav O, Tarre S (2002) Treatment of dairy wastewater using a vertical bed with passive aeration. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, pp 324–332Google Scholar
  35. Greenway M (2003) Suitability of macrophytes for nutrient removal from surface flow wetlands receiving secondary treated sewage effluent in Queensland, Australia. Water Sci Technol 48(2):121–128Google Scholar
  36. Greenway M (2007) The role of macrophytes in nutrient removal using constructed wetlands. In: Singh S, Tripathi R (eds) Environmental bioremediation technologies. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 331–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenway M, Chapman H (2002) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and mosquitoes. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, pp 1009–1023Google Scholar
  38. Grismer ME, Carr MA, Shepherd HL (2003) Evaluation of constructed wetland treatment performance for winery wastewater. Water Environ Res 75(5):412–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hauck RD (1984) Atmospheric nitrogen chemistry, nitrification, denitrification, and their relationships. In: Hutzinger O (ed) The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Berlin, pp 105–127Google Scholar
  40. Herskowitz J (1986) Listowel artificial marsh project. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Water Resources Branch, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  41. Hey DL, Kenimer AL, Barrett KR (1994) Water quality improvement by four experimental wetlands. Ecol Eng 3(4):381–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hopple A, Craft C (2013) Managed disturbance enhances biodiversity of restored wetlands in the agricultural Midwest. Ecol Eng 61B:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hume NP, Fleming MS, Horne AJ (2002a) Denitrification potential and carbon quality of four aquatic plants in wetland microcosms. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1706–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hume NP, Fleming MS, Horne AJ (2002b) Plant carbohydrate limitation on nitrate reduction in wetland microcosms. Water Res 36:577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ingersoll TL, Baker LA (1998) Nitrate removal in wetland microcosms. Water Res 32(3):677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johns M, Lesikar BJ, Kenimer AL, Weaver RW (1998) Nitrogen fate in a subsurface flow constructed wetland for on-site wastewater treatment. In: Proceedings of the 8th national symposium on individual and small community sewage systems. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Orlando, pp 237–246Google Scholar
  47. Kadlec RH (1994) Overview: surface flow constructed wetlands. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control ICWS’94, 6–10 Nov 1994. Secretariat, Guangzhou, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  48. Kadlec RH (1999) Constructed wetlands for treating landfill leachates. In: Mulamoottil G, McBean E, Rovers FA (eds) Constructed wetlands for the treatment of landfill leachates. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 17–31Google Scholar
  49. Kadlec RH (2001a) Thermal environments of subsurface treatment wetlands. Water Sci Technol 44(11/12):251–258Google Scholar
  50. Kadlec RH (2001b) Feasibility of wetland treatment BP-Amoco Casper refinery remediation. Phytokinetics, Inc., North LoganGoogle Scholar
  51. Kadlec RH (2003) Pond and wetland treatment. Water Sci Technol 48(5):1–8Google Scholar
  52. Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  53. Kadlec RH, Reddy KR (2001) Temperature effects in treatment wetlands. Water Environ Res 73(5):543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kadlec RH, Wallace S (2009) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 1048Google Scholar
  55. Kinsley CB, Crolla AM, Higgins J (2002) Ammonia reduction in aerated subsurface flow constructed wetlands. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, pp 961–971Google Scholar
  56. Kleinman RL, Girts M (1987) Acid mine water treatment wetlands: an overview of an emergent technology. In: Reddy KR, Smith WH (eds) Aquatic plants for water treatment and resource recovery. Magnolia Publishing, Orlando, pp 255–262Google Scholar
  57. Knight RL (1993) Operating experience with constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. TAPPI J 76(1):109–112Google Scholar
  58. Knight RL, Walton WE, O'Meara G, Reisen WK, Wass RD (2004) Strategies for effective mosquito control in constructed treatment wetlands. Ecol Eng 21:211–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Knutsen GA, Euliss NH Jr (2001) Wetland restoration in the Prairie Pothole region of North America: a literature review (Biological science report 2001–0006). U.S. Geological Survey, RestonGoogle Scholar
  60. Lakatos G (2000) Optimization of constructed wetlands for treatment of petrochemical wastewaters in Hungary. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control. International Water Association, ColchesterGoogle Scholar
  61. Liehr SK, Kozub DD, Rash JK, Sloop GM (2000) Constructed wetlands treatment of high nitrogen landfill leachate, project number 94-IRM-U. Alexandria, Water Environment Research FederationGoogle Scholar
  62. Liénard A, Esser D, Houdy D, Sabalçagaray P (2002) Design criteria and performances of reed bed filters for the treatment of washing parlour effluents. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, pp 534–542Google Scholar
  63. Mæhlum T, Haarstad K, Kraft PI (2002) Treatment wetlands for landfill leachates: case studies from cold temperate climates. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, pp 1157–1163Google Scholar
  64. Mandi L, Bouhoum K, Ouazanni N (1998) Application of constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment in an arid climate. Water Sci Technol 38(1):379–387Google Scholar
  65. Mara D (1976) Sewage treatment in hot climates. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Martin CV, Eldridge BF (1989) California's experience with mosquitoes in aquatic wastewater treatment systems. In: Hammer DA (ed) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment, municipal, industrial, and agricultural. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, pp 393–398Google Scholar
  67. Marton JM, Fennessy MS, Craft CB (2014) Functional differences between natural and restored wetlands in the Glaciated Interior Plains. J Environ Qual 43:409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mays PA, Edwards GS (2001) Comparison of heavy metal accumulation in a natural wetland and constructed wetlands receiving acid mine drainage. Ecol Eng 16:487–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mburu N, Tebitendwa S, Rousseau D, van Bruggen J, Lens P (2013) Performance evaluation of horizontal subsurface flow–constructed wetlands for the treatment of domestic wastewater in the tropics. J Environ Eng 139:358–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McBean E, Rovers FA (1999) Landfill leachate characteristics as inputs for the design of wetlands. In: Mulamoottil G, McBean E, Rovers FA (eds) Constructed wetlands for the treatment of landfill leachates. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  71. Morin G, Juillot F, Casiot C, Bruneel O, Personnè J-C, Elbaz-Poulichet F, Leblanc M, Ildefonse P, Calas G (2003) Bacterial formation of Tooeleite and mixed Arsenic (III) or Arsenic(V)-Iron(III) gels in the Carnoulès acid mine drainage, France. Environ Sci Technol 37(9):1705–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Newman JM, Clausen J, Neafsey JA (2000) Seasonal performance of a constructed wetland to process dairy milkhouse wastewater in Connecticut. Ecol Eng 14(1–2):181–198Google Scholar
  73. Omari KO, Revitt M, Shutes B, Garelick H (2003) Hydrocarbon removal in an experimental gravel bed constructed wetland. Water Sci Technol 48(5):275–281Google Scholar
  74. Palmer S, Breton M, Nunno T, Sullivan D, Surprenant N (1988) Metal/cyanide containing wastes: treatment technologies. Noyes Data Corporation, Park RidgeGoogle Scholar
  75. Pardue JH, Kassenga G, Shin WS (2000) Design approaches for chlorinated VOC treatment wetland. In: Means JL, Hinchee RE (eds) Wetlands and remediation: an international conference. Battelle Press, Columbus, pp 301–308Google Scholar
  76. Pawęska K, Kuczewski K (2013) The small wastewater treatment plants – hydrobotanical systems in environmental protection. Arch Environ Protection 39(1):3–16Google Scholar
  77. PBSJ (1989) Orlando easterly wetlands: monitoring report for 1988, report to city of OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  78. Pineywoods RC and D (2001) Constructed wetlands in East Texas, vol 4. Pineywoods RC and D, NagodochesGoogle Scholar
  79. Reddy KR, DeBusk WR (1987) Nutrient storage capabilities of aquatic and wetland plants for water treatment and resource recovery. Magnolia Publishers, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  80. Reddy KR, Patrick WH (1984) Nitrogen transformations and loss in flooded soils and sediments. CRC Crit Rev Environ Control 13:273–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Reddy KR, Khaleel R, Overcash MR, Westerman PW (1979) A nonpoint source model for land areas receiving animal wastes: mineralization of organic nitrogen. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 22:863–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rousseau DPL, Vanrolleghem PA, De Pauw N (2004) Model-based design of horizontal subsurface flow constructed treatment wetlands: a review. Water Res 38(6):1484–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Russell RC (1999) Constructed wetlands and mosquitoes: health hazards and management options – an Australian perspective. Ecol Eng 12(1–2):107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Samsó R, Garcia J (2013) BIO_PORE, a mathematical model to simulate biofilm growth and water quality improvement in porous media: application and calibration for constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 54(0):116–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schaafsma JA, Baldwin AH, Streb CA (2000) An evaluation of a constructed wetland to treat wastewater from a dairy farm in Maryland, United States. Ecol Eng 14(1–2):199–206Google Scholar
  86. Schnoor J, Litch LA, McCutcheon SC, Wolfe NL, Carreira LH (1995) Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 29:318A–323ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schwarzenbeck N, Leonhard K, Wilderer PA (2003) Treatment of landfill leachate: high tech or low tech? A case study. Water Sci Technol 48(11–12):277–284Google Scholar
  88. Service MW (1993) Mosquito ecology: field sampling methods, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sha C, Mitsch W, Mander U, Lu J, Batson J, Zhang L, He W (2011) Methane emissions from freshwater riverine wetlands. Ecol Eng 37:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shepherd HL, Grismer ME (1997) Constructed wetlands: an alternative for treating winery wastewater. Vineyard Winery Manag 23(5):65–68Google Scholar
  91. Shipin O, Koottatep T, Nguyen TTK, Polprasert C (2004) Integrated natural treatment systems for developing communities: low-tech N-removal through the fluctuating microbial pathways. In: Liénard A, Burnett H (eds) Proceedings of the 9th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, pp 75–82Google Scholar
  92. Sinclair Knight Merz (2000) Guidelines for using free water surface constructed wetlands to treat municipal sewage, DNRQ00047. Brisbane, Queensland Department of Natural ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  93. Stott R, Williams J, Jenkins T, Ramirez E, Warren A (2002) Pathogen and parasite removal in wastewater treatment constructed wetlands. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, pp 1206–1220Google Scholar
  94. Stowell R, Weber S, Tchobanoglous G, Wilson BA, Townzen KR (1985) Mosquito considerations in the design of wetland systems for the treatment of wastewater. In: Godfrey PJ, Kaynor ER, Pelczarski S, Benforado J (eds) Ecological considerations in wetlands treatment of municipal wastewaters. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 38–47Google Scholar
  95. Thullen J, Sartoris J, Walton WE (2002) Effects of vegetation management in constructed wetland treatment cells on water quality and mosquito production. Ecol Eng 18(4):441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Thurston JA, Gerba CP, Foster KE, Karpiscak MM (2001) Fate of indicator microorganisms, giardia and cryptosporidium in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Res 35(6):1547–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thut RN (1993) Feasibility of treating pulp mill effluent with a constructed wetland. In: Moshiri GA (ed) Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 441–447Google Scholar
  98. U.S. EPA (1993) Emerging technology summary: handbook for constructed wetlands receiving acid mine drainage, EPA 540/SR-93/523, U.S. EPA Office of Research and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  99. U.S. EPA (1997) Constructed wetlands and wastewater management for confined animal feeding operations, U.S. EPAGoogle Scholar
  100. U.S. EPA (2000) Constructed wetlands treatment of municipal wastewaters, EPA 625/R99/010. U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  101. Urbanc-Berčič, O. 1994. Investigation into the use of constructed reedbeds for municipal waste dump leachate treatment. Wat Sci Tech 29:289–294Google Scholar
  102. Van Oostrom AJ, Cooper RN (1990) Meat processing effluent treatment in surface flow and gravel bed constructed wastewater wetlands. In: Cooper PF, Findlater BC (eds) Constructed wetlands in water pollution control. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vasel J-L, Jupsin H, Annachhatre AP (2004) Nitrogen removal during leachate treatment: comparison of simple and sophisticated systems. Water Sci Technol 50(6):45–52Google Scholar
  104. Vymazal J (1995) Algae and nutrient cycling in wetlands. CRC Press/Lewis Publisher, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  105. Vymazal J (1998) Czech Republic. In: Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper PF, Green MB, Haberl R (eds) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 95–121Google Scholar
  106. Vymazal J (2001) Types of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: their potential for nutrient removal. In: Vymazal J (ed) Tranformations of nutrients in natural and constructed wetlands. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 1–93Google Scholar
  107. Vymazal J (2005) Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 25:478–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Vymazal J (2010) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience †. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Vymazal J, Dusek J, Kvet J (1999) Nutrient uptake and storage by plants in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow: a comparative study. In: Vymazal J (ed) Nutrient cycling and retention in natural and constructed wetlands. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 85–100Google Scholar
  110. Wallace SD, Parkin GF, Cross CS (2001) Cold climate wetlands: design and performance. Water Sci Technol 44(11/12):259–266Google Scholar
  111. Wallace SD, Knight RL, Water Environment Research Foundation (2006) Small-scale constructed wetland treatment systems: feasibility, design criteria, and O and M requirements. WERF/IWA Publishing, Alexandria/LondonGoogle Scholar
  112. Wass RD, Fox P (1993) Constructed wetlands for nonpoint source control of wastewater from a vehicle maintenance yard. In: Proceedings of the 66th annual WEFTEC conference, Anaheim. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, pp 9–20Google Scholar
  113. Weider RK (1989) A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in the eastern United States. Wetlands 9:299–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wemple C, Hendricks L (2000). Documenting the recovery of hydrocarbon-impacted wetlands: a multi-disciplinary approach. In: Wetlands and remediation: an international conference. Battelle Press, Columbus, pp 73–78Google Scholar
  115. Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology – lake and river ecosystems, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
  116. Williams CR, Jones RD, Wright SA (1996) Mosquito control in constructed wetlands. In: Proceedings of WEFTEC’96, 69th annual conference and exposition in Dallas, Texas. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, pp 333–344Google Scholar
  117. Wynn TM, Liehr SK (2001) Development of a constructed subsurface-flow wetland simulation model. Ecol Eng 16(4):519–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashutosh Das
    • 1
  • Mukesh Goel
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Environmental Engg.PRIST Deemed UniversityThanjavurIndia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Environmental SciencesNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations