Skip to main content

The Role of Macrophytes in Nutrient Removal using Constructed Wetlands

  • Chapter
Environmental Bioremediation Technologies

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bolton KGE, Greenway M (1997) A feasibility study of Melaleuca trees for use in constructed wetlands in subtropical Australia. Wat Sci Tech 35(5):247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton KGE, Greenway M (1999) Nutrient sinks in a constructed Melaleuca wetland receiving secondary effluent. Wat Sci Tech 40(3):341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brix H (1997) Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Wat Sci Tech 35(5):11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning K, Greenway M (2003) Nutrient removal and plant growth in a subsurface flow constructed wetland in Brisbane, Australia. Wat Sci Tech 48(5):183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • CH2M HILL, Payne Engineering (1997) Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Literature review, data base and research synthesis. Gulf of Mexico Program, Stennis Space Center, MI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal B (1999) Natural and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: potentials and problems. Wat Sci Tech 40(3):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenway M (1997) Nutrient content of wetland plants in constructed wetlands receiving municipal effluent in tropical Australia. Wat Sci Tech 35(5):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenway M, Woolley A (1999) Constructed wetlands in Queensland: performance efficiency and nutrient bioaccumulation. Ecol Eng 12:39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenway, Woolley A (2001) Changes in plant biomass and nutrient removal over three years in a constructed wetland in Cairns, Australia. Wat Sci Tech 44:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway M (2002) Seasonal Phragmites biomass and nutrient storage in a subtropical subsurface flow wetland receiving secondary treated effluent in Brisbane, Australia. 8th IWA International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, Tanzania, September 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway M, Bolton K (2002) Role of constructed Melaleuca wetlands in water pollution control in Australia. In: Treatment Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. CH2M HILL, Canada Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway M (2003) Suitability of macrophytes for nutrient removal from surface flow constructed wetlands receiving secondary treated effluent in Queensland, Australia. Wat Sci Tech 48(2):211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt PG, Poach ME (2001) State of the art for animal wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands. Wat Sci Tech 44(11-12):19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • International Water Association (2000) Constructed Wetlands for Pollution Control: processes, performance, design and operation. IWA Specialist Group on Use of Macrophytes in Water Pollution Control. IWA Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantawanichkul S, Somprasert S, Aekasin U, Shutes RBE (2003) Treatment of agricultural wastewater in two experimental combined constructed wetland systems in a tropical climate. Wat Sci Tech 48(5):199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Clarke RA, Bastian RK (2001) Surface flow (SF) treatment wetlands as a habitat for wildlife and humans. Wat Sci Tech 44(11-12):27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvet J, Dusek J, Husak S (1999) Vascular plants suitable for wastewater treatment in temperate zones. In: Vymazal J (ed) Nutrient Cycling and Retention in Natural and Constructed Wetlands. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, Netherlands, pp 101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolt E (1996) Duckweeds (Lemnaceae): Morphological and ecological characteristics and their potential for recycling of nutrients. Environmental Research Forum 5-6:289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozimek (1996) Usefulness of Lemna minor in wastewater treatment in temperate climates-myth or fact? Env Res Forum 5-6:297–302

    Google Scholar 

  • QDNR (2000) Queensland Department of Natural Resources. Guidelines for Using Freewater Surface Constructed Wetlands to Treat Municipal Sewage. QDNR, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, De Busk WF (1987) Nutrient Storage Capabilities of Aquatic and Wetland Plants. In: Reddy, KR, Smith WH (eds) Aquatic Plants for Water Treatment and Resource Recovery. Magnolia Publishing, Orlando, Florida, pp 337–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, D’Angelo EM (1997) Biogeochemical indicators to evaluate pollutant removal efficiency in constructed wetlands. Wat Sci Tech 35:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmankova E, Kvet J, Rejmanek M (1990) Maximising Duckweed (Lemnaceae) Production by Suitable Harvest Strategy. In: Whigham DF, Good RE, Kvet J (eds) Wetland Ecology and Management: Case Studies. Academic Publishers, Den Haag, The Netherlands, pp 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CC (2001) Plants as ecosystem engineers in subsurface flow treatment wetlands. Wat Sci Tech 44(11-12):9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1988) United States Environment Protection Agency Design Manual: Constructed Wetlands and Aquatic Plant Systems for Municipal Wastewater Treatment. EPA/625/1-88/022. Center for Environmental Research Information, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2000) United States Environment Protection Agency Manual: Constructed Wetlands Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, pp 152

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J, Dusek J, Kvet J (1999) Nutrient uptake and storage by plants in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow: a comparative study. In: Vymazal J (ed) Nutrient Cycling and Retention in Natural and Constructed Wetlands. Backhuys Publishers, pp 85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel RC (2001) Fundamental processes within natural and constructed wetland ecosystems: short-term versus long-term objectives. Wat Sci Tech 44(11-12):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JB (2002) Phytoremediation in wetland ecosystems: progress, problems, and potential. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 21(6):607–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenway, M. (2007). The Role of Macrophytes in Nutrient Removal using Constructed Wetlands. In: Singh, S.N., Tripathi, R.D. (eds) Environmental Bioremediation Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34793-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics