Advertisement

Building the Virtual Experiment Learning Activities to Facilitate Self-Adaptive Learning in IPv6 Subject

  • Jun-Ming SuEmail author
  • Shian-Shyong Tseng
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Due to the IPV4 address exhaustion problem, how to efficiently promote and learn the IPv6 upgrade knowledge has been paid more attention. Therefore, based on the concept of the self-adaptive learning, this study proposes a design scheme of the Virtual Experiment Learning Activity for learning IPv6 subject (IPv6-VELA), which is able to integrate the relevant learning materials for conceptual learning with virtual experiment for the hands-on learning. Therefore, the learners are able to learn the IPv6 upgrade knowledge in the step-by-step manner by means of the scaffolding supports, where the Formative and Summative Diagnostic Reports will be generated according to learners’ learning portfolio to assist them in facilitating the self-adaptive learning. The experimental result also shows that the IPv6-VELA-based learning activity is beneficial for both the learners and teachers.

Keywords

IPv6 upgrade training Virtual experiments Learning activity Scaffolding Personalized diagnosis Self-adaptive learning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Republic of China under the number of MOST 104-2511-S-468-002-MY2, MOST 105-2511-S-024-009, and NSC 102-2511-S-468-003-MY2.

References

  1. Atif, Y. (2003). A constructive multimedia approach to e-learning. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 8(1), 25–33.Google Scholar
  2. Atif, Y., Benlamri, R., & Berri, J. (2003). Learning objects based framework for self-adaptive learning. Education and Information Technologies, 8(4), 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, R.E., Persky, H., Weiss, A., & Jenkins, F. (2010). Measuring problem solving with technology: A demonstration study for NAEP. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8(8), 1–44. Retrieved from http://www.jtla.org
  6. Carneiro, G., Fontes, H., & Ricardo, M. (2011). Fast prototyping of network protocols through ns-3 simulation model reuse. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 19(9), 2063–2075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ChemCollective. (2016). Retrieved 2016, from http://www.chemcollective.org/
  8. Chou, C. Y., Lai, K. R., Chao, P. Y., & Chen, T. H. (2015). Negotiation based adaptive learning sequences: Combining adaptivity and adaptability. Computers and Education, 88, 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danscourses. (2016). Retrieved 2016 from http://www.danscourses.com/
  10. Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., & Bedgood Jr., D. R. (2009). Effectiveness of a Virtual Laboratory as a preparatory resource for Distance Education chemistry students. Computers & Education, 53(3), 853–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawidek, M. T., Roach, V. A., Ott, M. C., & Wilson, T. D. (2016). Changing the learning curve in novice laparoscopists: Incorporating direct visualization into the simulation training program. Journal of Surgical Education. Available online 4 October 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Dooley, M., & Rooney, T. (2013). IPv6 deployment and management (1st ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-IEEE Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning? Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FA. (2016). Formative assessment. Retrieved 2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formative_assessment
  16. Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., et al. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physics Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 1, 010103-1–010103-8.Google Scholar
  17. Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Reid, S., & LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physics Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 1(1), 010103-1–010103-8.Google Scholar
  18. Gu, D. J., Liu, X. H., Qin, G., Yan, S. J., Luo, Z., & Yan, B. P. (2013). VNET6: IPv6 virtual network for the collaboration between applications and networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(6), 1579–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gurgel, P. H. M., Branco, L. H. C., Barbosa, E. F., & Branco, K. R. L. J. C. (2013). Development of a practical computer network course through Netkit virtualization tool. Procedia Computer Science, 18, 2583–2586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 50th annual meeting (pp. 904–908). Santa Monica: HFES.Google Scholar
  21. Klahr, D., Triona, L. M., & Williams, C. (2007). Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huston, G. (2011). Address exhaustion. The Internet Protocol Journal, 14(1). Retrieved 2016 from http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/press/internet-protocol-journal/back-issues/table-contents-51/141-address.html
  23. Hwang, G. J. (2003). A conceptual map model for developing intelligent tutoring systems. Computers & Education, 40(3), 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IEEE-USA. (2009). Next generation internet: IPv4 address exhaustion, mitigation strategies and implications for the U.S. Retrieved 2016 from http://www.ieeeusa.org/policy/whitepapers/IEEEUSAWP-IPv62009.pdf
  25. IETF. (2016). Internet engineering task force. Retrieved 2016 from https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/internet-technical-community/ietf
  26. IPv4. (2016a). IPv4 address exhaustion. Retrieved 2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv4_address_exhaustion
  27. IPv6. (2016b). IPv6 deployment and support. Retrieved 2016 from http://www.6deploy.eu/index.php?page=e-learning2
  28. Jacobs-Sera, D., Hatfull, G. F., & Hanauer, D. I. (2009). Assessing scientific inquiry. In I. D. Hanauer, G. F. Hatfull, & D. Jacobs-Sera (Eds.), Active assessment: Assessing scientific inquiry (pp. 31–43). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-89649-6_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehmanna, T., Hähnleinb, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32(2014), 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lenne, D., Abel, M. H., Trigano, P., & Leblanc, A. (2008). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments-an investigation with university students, technology. Pedagogy and Education, 17(3), 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levina, S. L., & Schmidt, S. (2014). IPv4 to IPv6: Challenges, solutions, and lessons. Telecommunications Policy, 38(11), 1059–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Linn, M. C., Chang, H.-Y., Chiu, J. L., Zhang, Z., & McElhaney, K. (2011). Can desirable difficulties overcome deceptive clarity in scientific visualizations? In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A Festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 235–258). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  33. Montavont, N., Montavont, J., Hachana, S. (2007). Wireless IPv6 simulator: SimulX. In Proceedings of the 2007 spring simulation multiconference (Vol. 1, pp. 247–255).Google Scholar
  34. Nakamura, A. (2016). Self-adaptive e-learning website for mathematics. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(12), 961–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nikkel, B. J. (2007). An introduction to investigating IPv6 networks. Digital Investigation, 4(2), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nikkhah, M. (2016). Maintaining the progress of IPv6 adoption. Computer Networks, 102(19), 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oxley, A. (2014). Issues affecting the adoption of IPv6. In Proceeding of the 2014 international conference on computer and information sciences (ICCOINS), 3–5 June 2014.Google Scholar
  38. Packet Tracer. (2016). An innovative network configuration simulation tool free for Networking Academy students. Retrieved 2016 from https://www.netacad.com/about-networking-academy/packet-tracer
  39. Panjaburees, P., Triampo, W., Hwang, G. J., Chuedoung, M., & Triampo, D. (2013). Development of a diagnostic and remedial learning system based on an enhanced concept effect model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(1), 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pintrich, P., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. RFC 791. (1981, September). Internet protocol, DARPA internet program protocol specification. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.Google Scholar
  43. RFC 2460. (1998, December). Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification, S. Deering, R. Hinden.Google Scholar
  44. SA. (2016). Summative assessment. Retrieved 2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summative_assessment
  45. Su, J.M. (2014). A self-regulated learning system to support adaptive scaffolding in hypermedia-based learning environments. In Advanced e-learning workshop (AEL) in conjunction with IEEE UMEDIA 2014, Ulaanbaatar, 12–14 July 2014 (pp. 326–331).Google Scholar
  46. Su, J.M. (2015, August 24–26). A self-regulated learning tutor to adaptively scaffold the personalized learning: A study on learning outcome for grade 8 mathematics. In Advanced e-learning workshop (AEL) in conjunction with IEEE UMEDIA 2015 (pp. 376–380). Colombo: University of Colombo School of Computing.Google Scholar
  47. Su, J. M., & Huang, C. F. (2014). An easy-to-use 3D visualization system for planning context-aware applications in smart buildings. International Journal Computer Standards & Interfaces, 32(2), 312–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Su, J. M., & Lin, H. Y. (2015). A reconfigurable simulation-based test system for automatically assessing software operating skills, special issue technology-supported assessment in education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society (ETS), 18(2), 60–79.Google Scholar
  49. Triona, L. M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Point and click or grab and heft: Comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students’ ability to design experiments. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wenning, C. (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Education Online, 4(2), 21–24.Google Scholar
  51. Winn, W., Stahr, F., Sarason, C., Fruland, R., Oppenheimer, P., & Lee, Y. L. (2006). Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Roos, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yaron, D., Karabinos, M., Evans, K., Cuadros, J., Davenport, J., Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (2008). The ChemCollective Digital Library. In online conference CONFCHEM.Google Scholar
  54. Yaron, D., Karabinos, M., Evans, K., Cuadros, J., Davenport, J., Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (2009). The ChemCollective Digital Library. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(1), 132.Google Scholar
  55. Yaron, D., Karabinos, M., Lange, D., Greeno, J. G., & Leinhardt, G. (2010). The ChemCollective: Virtual labs and online activities for introductory chemistry courses. Science, 328(5978), 584–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zacharia, Z. C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1021–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang, Y., & Bi, H. (2012). The simulation of hierarchical mobile IPv6 with fast handover using NS2. Procedia Engineering, 37, 214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information and Learning TechnologyNational University of TainanTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of M-Commerce and Multimedia ApplicationsAsia UniversityTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations