Abstract
The English word “monster” encapsulates a variety of distinct prodigious, medical, and natural phenomena. Prodigious, portentous, or miraculous monsters could provide the people of Europe with evidence of God’s will, warning, or wrath, when read emblematically by a contemporary expert. Monstrous births (physically abnormal humans and animals born to anatomically normal parents) might be interpreted as evidence of God’s ineffable variety or Nature’s mistakes or alternately in a political vein. If an entire human society were composed of such unusual individuals, all of whom shared the same physical or behavioral abnormality, they would constitute one of the monstrous races who lived far beyond the margins of civilized society. Similarly, fabulous beasts such as unicorns, griffins, dragons, and sea monsters were believed to populate the far ends of the earth and were interpreted as both warnings of the dangers of the unknown and representations of actual living animals. Monsters were reproduced in a variety of media, from lavishly illustrated maps and manuscript bestiaries, to Latin medical and wonder treatises, to cheaply printed pamphlets and broadsides in the vernacular. Despite their differences, such works repeated the same examples, often accompanied by the same woodcut illustrations; indeed, once printed in either Latin or the vernacular, a book about monsters was likely to be both translated and reprinted in multiple editions.
References
Primary Literature
Boaistuau, P. 1560. Histoires prodigieuses. Paris: Vincent Sertenas.
Lycosthenes, C. 1557. Prodigiorum ac ostentorum chronicon. Basel: Henricum Petri.
Melanchthon, P. and M. Luther. 1523. Deuttung der zwo grewlichen Figuren Bapstesels zu Rom vnd Munchkalbs zu Freyberg jn Meyssen funden. Wittenberg: [Henricum Steiner].
Secondary Literature
Crawford, J. 2005. Marvelous Protestantism: Monstrous births in post-Reformation England. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Daston, L., and K. Park. 2001. Wonders and the order of nature 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.
Davies, S. 2012. The unlucky, the bad and the ugly: Categories of monstrosity from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. In The Ashgate research companion to monsters and the monstrous, ed. A. S. Mittman, and P. J. Dendle, 49–75. Ashgate: Farnham, Surrey and Burlington, VT.
Friedman, J.B. 2000. The monstrous races in medieval art and thought. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Huet, M.-H. 1993. Monstrous imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nigg, J. 2013. Sea monsters: A voyage around the world’s most beguiling map. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Spinks, J. 2009. Monstrous births and visual culture in sixteenth-century Germany. London: Pickering and Chatto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Dirks, W. (2018). Monsters in Renaissance Science. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1102-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1102-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Monsters in Renaissance Science- Published:
- 24 October 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1102-2
-
Original
Monsters in Renaissance Science- Published:
- 19 February 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1102-1