Aging in Digital Places

  • Hannah R. MarstonEmail author
Living reference work entry

Later version available View entry history


This book chapter reviews current research in the area of digital game technology for rehabilitation, socialization, quality of life (QoL), design, and cognition. In recent years, there has been substantial progress in these areas. With technology advancement, there is the potential to facilitate aging in place, resulting in the continuation and maintenance of independent community-based living at varying stages of the life course. As technological developments improve, the concept of integrating digital game technology into the lives of an aging population is becoming more popular than ever before. However, during the implementation into the home, issues of physical space and technology integration may occur. There are many types of dwellings (apartments, houses, or bungalows) where older adults reside which contain a variety of fixtures and furnishings. Implementation of technology into these different dwellings may be difficult due to the added furniture already installed. This chapter initiates discussion within these areas and provides recommendations for future technology integration.


Technology Aging Environment Older adults Physical space Digital games 


  1. Ball K, Berch D, Sherry LW (2002) Effects of Cognitive Training Interventions With Older Adults. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 288(18):2271–2281Google Scholar
  2. Basak C, Boot WR, Voss MW, Kramer AF (2008) Can training in real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? Psychol Aging 23(4):765–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanson Henkemans OA, Alpay LL, Dumay Adrie CM (2010) Aging in place: self-care in smart home environments, smart home systems (ed: Al-Qutayri MA). ISBN: 978-953-307-050-6, InTech. doi:10.5772/8410.
  4. Bogost I (2005) The rhetoric of exergaming. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Digital Art & Culture Conference (DAC’05), Copenhagen, Denmark, November 30th-December 3rd 2005Google Scholar
  5. Boot WR, Kramer AF, Simons DJ, Fabiani M, Gratton G (2008) The effects of video game playing on attention memory and executive control. Acta Psychol (Amst) 129(3):387–98. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castaneda K (2006) Nintendo and PixArt team up. Nintendo World report, 13 May 2006 (Retrieved Sept 2013)Google Scholar
  7. Clark J, Lamphear A, Riddick C (1987) The effects of video game playing on the response selection processing of elderly adults. J Gerontol 42:82–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Schutter B (2010) Never too old to play: the appeal of digital games to an older audience. Games Culture 6(2):155–170, doi: 10.1177 = 1555412010364978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Schutter B, Vanden Abeele V (2010) Designing meaningful play within the psycho-social context of older adults. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on fun and games, fun and games ’10. ACM, New York, pp 84–93. doi: 10.1145/1823818.1823827Google Scholar
  10. Demiris G, Hensel BK (2008) Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of “smart home” applications. Yearb Med Inform 33–40.,
  11. European Commission Information Society and Media (2010) I2010: Independent Living for the Ageing Society. Retrieved from Accessed Sept 2014
  12. Farris M, Bates R, Resnick H, Stabler N (1994) Evaluation of computer games’ impact upon cognitively impaired frail elderly. In: Resnick H (ed) Electronic tools for social work practice and education. Haworth Press, New York, pp 219–228Google Scholar
  13. Fisk AD, Rogers WA, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Sharit J (2009) Designing for older adults: principles and creative human factors approaches, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flynn B (2003) Geography of the digital hearth. Information, Communication and Society 6(4):551–576.Google Scholar
  15. Flynn S, Palma P, Bender A (2007) Feasibility of using the Sony PlayStation 2 gaming platform for an individual poststroke: a case report. J Neurol Phys Ther 31(4):180–9. doi:10.1097/NPT.0b013e31815d00d5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldstein J, Cajko L, Oosterbroek M, Michielsen M, Houten O, Salverda F (1997) Video games and the elderly. Soc Behav Gerontol 25(4):345–352Google Scholar
  17. Harrison S, Dourish P (1996) Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the CSCW’96: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, pp 67–76Google Scholar
  18. IJsselsteijn W, Nap HH, de Kort YK, Poels K (2007) Digital game design for elderly users. Retrieved from
  19. Kasugai K, Ziefle M, Rӧcker C, Russell P (2010) Creating spatio-temporal contiguities between real and virtual rooms in an assistive living environment. In: Bonner J, Smyth M, O’Neill S, Mival O (eds) Proceedings of create 10 innovative interactions. Elms Court, Loughborough, pp 62–67Google Scholar
  20. Lanks B (2012) Jawbone releases UP, a wristband for tracking your wellness. FastcoDesign, Retrieved Sept 2013
  21. Laurel B (2001) Utopian entrepreneur. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Marston HR (2010) Wii like to play too: computer gaming habits of older adults. PhD thesis. Teesside University, Middlesbrough, North YorkshireGoogle Scholar
  23. Marston HR (2012) Older adults as 21st century game designers. Comput Games J Whitsun 1(1):90–102Google Scholar
  24. Marston HR (2013a) Design recommendations for digital game design within an ageing society. J Educ Gerontol 39(2):103–118. doi:10.1080/03601277.2012.689936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marston HR (2013b) Digital gaming perspectives of older adults: content vs interaction. J Educ Gerontol 39(3):194–208MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marston HR, Smith ST (2012) Interactive videogame technologies to support independence in the elderly: a narrative review. Games Health J 1(2):139–152. doi:10.1089/g4h.2011.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marston HR, Greenlay S, van Hoof J (2013) Understanding the Nintendo Wii console in long-term care facilities. Technol Disabil 25(2):77–85. doi:10.3233/TAD-130369Google Scholar
  28. Pearce C (2008) The truth about baby boomer gamers: a study of over-forty computer game players. Games Cult 3:142–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Penninx B, van Tilburg T, Kriegsman D, Boeke A, Deeg D, van Eijk J (1999) Social network, social support and loneliness in older persons with different chronic diseases. J Aging Health 11(2):151–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pierce D (2012) Jawbone up review (2012). The Verge, 27 Nov 2012. Retrieved Sept 2013
  31. Sall A, Grinter RE (2007) Let’s get physical! In, out, and around the gaming circle of physical gaming at home. Comput Support Coop Work 16(1–2):199–229Google Scholar
  32. Schueren B (1986) Video games: an exploration of their potential as recreational activity programs in nursing homes. Act Adapt Aging 8(1):49–58Google Scholar
  33. Simon B (2009) Wii are out of control: bodies, game screens and the production of gestural excess. Loading 3(4). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1354043.
  34. Stone B (2011) Jawbone to release wristband health monitor. SFgate, 05 Nov 2011. Retrieved Sept 2013
  35. Voida A, Greenberg S (2009) Wii all play: the console game as a computational meeting place. In: Olsen DR Jr, Arthur RB (eds) Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems – ACM CHI’09. ACM, New York, pp 1559–1568Google Scholar
  36. Voida A, Greenberg S (2010) A gameroom of our own: exploring the domestic gaming environment. Technical report. University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science, Alberta. Retrieved from
  37. Weisman S (1983) Computer games and the frail elderly. Gerontologist 23(4):361–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whitcomb GR (1990) Computer games for the elderly. In: Anderson RE, Martin CD (eds) Proceedings of the CQL90 conference on computers and the quality of life. ACM, New York, pp 112–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whitworth D (2010). Kinect gets UK release date. BBC News Beat, 17 Aug 2010. Retrieved Sept 2013
  40. Wisniowski H (2006) Analog devices and nintendo collaboration drives video game innovation with iMEMS motion signal processing technology. Analog Devices, Inc. Retrieved Sept 2013Google Scholar
  41. Woollaston V (2013) The sensor that reads your heartbeat from four feet away WITHOUT touching you. The Daily Mail – Science, 13 Sept 2013. Retrieved Sept 2013
  42. Zijlstra W, Aminian K (2007) Mobility assessment in older people: new possibilities and challenges. Eur J Ageing 4:3–12. doi:10.1007/s10433-007-0041-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zijlstra W, Becker C, Pfeiffer K (2011) Wearable systems for monitoring mobility related activities: from technology to application for healthcare services. In: Rocker C, Ziefle M (eds) E-health, assistive technologies and applications for assisted living. Medical Information Science Reference, Hershey, pp 244–267. doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-469-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Movement and Sport GerontologyGerman Sport University CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations