Abstract
In this chapter, we present Ludwik Fleck’s conception of epistemology and the history of science, structured around the concepts of thought style and thought collective. We aim to demonstrate that, besides introducing the idea that social and historical factors condition scientific knowledge, Fleck was also a pioneer in conceiving biology as a model for epistemology. Unfortunately, the Kuhnian reading of Fleck’s work emphasized this social approach and ignored that biological influence. Thus, in the wake of Kuhnian influence, Fleck’s social conception of science was widely disseminated, and the role of biology was ignored, even by significant authors of the historiography of science. Highlighting the influence that Fleck received of biology connected to social and historical factors enables an interpretation more in line with the reflections of the Polish thinker on the history of science and its epistemology.
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The first list of Fleck’s scientific publications appeared in Schäfer and Schnelle (1983, 182–195) and was expanded in Werner and Zittel (2011, 656–672); the most up-to-date bibliography can be found in Ciesielska and Jarnicki (2021). Originally published in different journals in Polish or German, philosophical articles were republished in German (Schäfer and Schnelle 1983) and English (Cohen and Schnelle 1986). They are “Some specific features of the medical way of thinking” (1927); “On the crisis of ‘reality’” (1929); “Scientific observation and perception in general” (1935); “The problem of epistemology” (1936); “Problems of the science of science” (1946); “To look, to see, to know” (1947); and “Crisis in science” (1960), the last of which remained unpublished until 1983.
- 3.
It is significant that one of Fleck’s first published articles, “On the Crisis of Reality” (1929), stems precisely from a discussion established in physics at the time.
- 4.
- 5.
Kuhn declared that he had learned of the existence of Fleck’s book in a note from Experience and prediction (Reichenbach 1938, 224) written by logical empiricist philosopher Hans Reichenbach (Kuhn 1979, viii). In that book, Reichenbach formulated his well-known distinction between “the context of discovery” and “the context of justification.” Kuhn reported that he had been excited to find Fleck’s book reference and said: “if someone wrote a book with that title, I have to read it!” (Kuhn, 2000, 283). For the American philosopher, it was surprising that a fact had a “development” (Kuhn, 2000, 283). For more on how Kuhn came to know Fleck’s book and the possible genealogical relationship between the theories of both philosophers, see Jarnicki and Greif (2022).
- 6.
According to correspondence between Fleck and Schlick dated September 5, 1933, in which Fleck asked Schlick for assistance in finding a publisher willing to publish his book, whose initial title was Die Analyse einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Versuch einer vergleichenden Erkenntnistheorie (The analysis of a scientific fact: an attempt at a comparative theory of knowledge), see Werner and Zittel (2011, 561–562).
- 7.
Schlick replied to Fleck more than 6 months later, on March 16, 1934, apologizing for the long delay, saying he was interested in the topic but reporting the difficulties of publication and finally informing him that he would not be able to help. See Werner and Zittel (2011, 562–563).
- 8.
Fleck spent 1927 studying medicine in Vienna at the Government Institute for Serotherapy, thus being closer to the atmosphere of the Vienna Circle. That same year he also began his career as an epistemologist, publishing the article “Some specific features of the medical way of thinking.”
- 9.
One exception was Edgar Zilsel, who, after immigrating to the USA, developed a new approach to the history of science, presenting an epistemological perspective based on historical, social, and technological aspects. See Condé (2022).
- 10.
Although Fleck gave this expression his philosophical conceptualization, it was first used by Mannheim in 1925; see Trenn (1979, xv). It is also interesting to note that Carnap – the target of Fleck’s criticism – in the preface of the 1928 first edition of his book Der logische Aufbau der Welt (The Logical Construction of the World), uses the expression Denkstil when characterizing the change in the way of doing philosophy started by the Vienna Circle. In clarifying what changes in the new philosophy of science, Carnap points out, “this new attitude changes not only the thought style (Denkstil) but also the task” of philosophy (Carnap, 1961 [1928], xix). Alexandre Koyré also uses the expression “thought style.” In his 1930 text, “La pensée moderne,” later presented in his book Étude d’histoire de la pensée scientifique, Koyré uses the expression “style” to characterize what he calls the Zeitgeist of modernity or the “style of our time” using, ultimately, the expression “style de pensée” (thought style) itself (Koyré, 1973 [1966], 18).
- 11.
- 12.
Darwin’s book title On the Origins of Species in German is Die Entstehung der Arten; one can see a similarity with Fleck’s book title in German, Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache.
References
Bloor D (1983) Wittgenstein: a social theory of knowledge. Macmillan, London
Carnap R (1961) Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Felix Meiner, Hamburg. 1928/1961
Ciesielska M, Jarnicki P (2021) Ludwik Fleck – mikrobiolog i filozof. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa
Cohen R, Schnelle T (Eds.) (1986) Cognition and fact: materials on Ludwik Fleck. Reidel Publish Company, Dordrecht
Condé ML (2005) Paradigma versus Estilo de Pensamento na História da Ciência. In: Condé ML, Figueiredo B (eds) Ciência, História e Teoria. Belo Horizonte, pp 123–146
Condé ML (2018) Mutações no Estilo de Pensamento: Ludwik Fleck e o Modelo Biológico na Historiografia da Ciência. Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea 6(1):155–186. https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v6i1.20236
Condé ML (2022) The epistemological foundations of the Zilsel thesis. In: Romizi D, Wulz M, Nemeth E (eds) Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, historian, sociologist, Vienna circle institute yearbook, vol 27. Springer, Cham
Fleck L (1979) Genesis and development of a scientific fact. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1935/1979
Fleck L (1980) Entstehung und entwicklung einer wissenschftlichen Tatsache. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. 1935/1980
Fleck L (1986a) Some specific features of the medical way of thinking. In: Cohen R, Schnelle T (eds) Cognition and fact: materials on Ludwik Fleck. Reidel, Boston. 1929/1986
Fleck L (1986b) On the crisis of ‘reality’. In: Cohen R, Schnelle T (eds) Cognition and fact: materials on Ludwik Fleck. Reidel, Boston. 1929/1986
Graf EO (2009) Habent sua fata libelli – le destin des livres. In: Fehr J, Jas N, Löwy I (eds) Penser avec Fleck: investigating a life studying life sciences. Collegium Helveticum, Zurich
Jarnicki P (2016) On the shoulders of Ludwik Fleck? On the bilingual philosophical legacy of Ludwik Fleck and its Polish, German and English translations. The Translator 22(3):271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2015.1126881
Jarnicki P, Greif H (2022) The ‘Aristotle experience’ revisited: Thomas Kuhn meets Ludwik Fleck on the road to structure. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2020-0160
Koyré A (1973) Étude d’histoire de la pensée scientifique. Gallimard, Paris. 1966/1973
Kuhn T (1962/1970) The structure of scientific revolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kuhn T (1979) Foreword. In: Fleck L, Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago, Chicago
Kuhn T (2000) The road since structure. The University of Chicago, Chicago
Latour B (2008) Postface – Transmettre la syphilis. Partager l’objectivité. In: Fleck L (ed) Genese et développement d’un fait scientifique. Edition Flammarion, Paris
Latour B, Woolgar S (1979/1996) La vie de laboratoire: la production du fait scientifique. La Découverte, Paris
Reichenbach H (1938) Experience and prediction: an analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Schäfer L, Schnelle T (1980) Einleitung. In: Fleck L (ed) Entstehung und entwicklung einer wissenschftlichen Tatsache. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, pp vii–xlix. 1935/1980
Schäfer L, Schnelle T (eds) (1983) Ludwik Fleck: Erfahrung und Tatsache. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Schnelle T (1982) Ludwik Fleck - Leben und denken: Zur Entstehung und Entwicklung des soziologischen Denkstils in der Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Hochschul Verlag, Freiburg
Shapin S, Schaffer S (1985) Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Trenn TJ (1979) Preface. In: Fleck L (ed) Genesis and development of a scientific fact. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp xiii–xix. 1935/1979
Werner S, Zittel C (eds) (2011) Ludwik Fleck: Denkstile und Tatsachen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Condé, M.L., Jarnicki, P. (2023). Ludwik Fleck: Thought Style and Thought Collective in the Historiography of Science. In: Condé, M.L., Salomon, M. (eds) Handbook for the Historiography of Science. Historiographies of Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_5-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_5-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99498-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99498-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Humanities, Soc. Sciences and Law
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Ludwik Fleck: Thought Style and Thought Collective in the Historiography of Science- Published:
- 13 July 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_5-2
-
Original
Ludwik Fleck: Thought Style and Thought Collective in the Historiography of Science- Published:
- 24 May 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_5-1