Skip to main content

Ludwik Fleck: Thought Style and Thought Collective in the Historiography of Science

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbook for the Historiography of Science

Part of the book series: Historiographies of Science ((HISTSC))

  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we present Ludwik Fleck’s conception of epistemology and the history of science, structured around the concepts of thought style and thought collective. We aim to demonstrate that, besides introducing the idea that social and historical factors condition scientific knowledge, Fleck was also a pioneer in conceiving biology as a model for epistemology. Unfortunately, the Kuhnian reading of Fleck’s work emphasized this social approach and ignored that biological influence. Thus, in the wake of Kuhnian influence, Fleck’s social conception of science was widely disseminated, and the role of biology was ignored, even by significant authors of the historiography of science. Highlighting the influence that Fleck received of biology connected to social and historical factors enables an interpretation more in line with the reflections of the Polish thinker on the history of science and its epistemology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a short biography and a descriptive analysis of Fleck’s work, see Fleck (1935/1979, 149–153), Schäfer and Schnelle (1980, vii-xlix), and Schnelle (1982).

  2. 2.

    The first list of Fleck’s scientific publications appeared in Schäfer and Schnelle (1983, 182–195) and was expanded in Werner and Zittel (2011, 656–672); the most up-to-date bibliography can be found in Ciesielska and Jarnicki (2021). Originally published in different journals in Polish or German, philosophical articles were republished in German (Schäfer and Schnelle 1983) and English (Cohen and Schnelle 1986). They are “Some specific features of the medical way of thinking” (1927); “On the crisis of ‘reality’” (1929); “Scientific observation and perception in general” (1935); “The problem of epistemology” (1936); “Problems of the science of science” (1946); “To look, to see, to know” (1947); and “Crisis in science” (1960), the last of which remained unpublished until 1983.

  3. 3.

    It is significant that one of Fleck’s first published articles, “On the Crisis of Reality” (1929), stems precisely from a discussion established in physics at the time.

  4. 4.

    Latour refers to the book as the white whale Moby Dick that appears and then submerges to emerge from time to time; see Latour (2008, 251). For a history of the editorial process of Fleck’s book, see Graf (2009).

  5. 5.

    Kuhn declared that he had learned of the existence of Fleck’s book in a note from Experience and prediction (Reichenbach 1938, 224) written by logical empiricist philosopher Hans Reichenbach (Kuhn 1979, viii). In that book, Reichenbach formulated his well-known distinction between “the context of discovery” and “the context of justification.” Kuhn reported that he had been excited to find Fleck’s book reference and said: “if someone wrote a book with that title, I have to read it!” (Kuhn, 2000, 283). For the American philosopher, it was surprising that a fact had a “development” (Kuhn, 2000, 283). For more on how Kuhn came to know Fleck’s book and the possible genealogical relationship between the theories of both philosophers, see Jarnicki and Greif (2022).

  6. 6.

    According to correspondence between Fleck and Schlick dated September 5, 1933, in which Fleck asked Schlick for assistance in finding a publisher willing to publish his book, whose initial title was Die Analyse einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Versuch einer vergleichenden Erkenntnistheorie (The analysis of a scientific fact: an attempt at a comparative theory of knowledge), see Werner and Zittel (2011, 561–562).

  7. 7.

    Schlick replied to Fleck more than 6 months later, on March 16, 1934, apologizing for the long delay, saying he was interested in the topic but reporting the difficulties of publication and finally informing him that he would not be able to help. See Werner and Zittel (2011, 562–563).

  8. 8.

    Fleck spent 1927 studying medicine in Vienna at the Government Institute for Serotherapy, thus being closer to the atmosphere of the Vienna Circle. That same year he also began his career as an epistemologist, publishing the article “Some specific features of the medical way of thinking.”

  9. 9.

    One exception was Edgar Zilsel, who, after immigrating to the USA, developed a new approach to the history of science, presenting an epistemological perspective based on historical, social, and technological aspects. See Condé (2022).

  10. 10.

    Although Fleck gave this expression his philosophical conceptualization, it was first used by Mannheim in 1925; see Trenn (1979, xv). It is also interesting to note that Carnap – the target of Fleck’s criticism – in the preface of the 1928 first edition of his book Der logische Aufbau der Welt (The Logical Construction of the World), uses the expression Denkstil when characterizing the change in the way of doing philosophy started by the Vienna Circle. In clarifying what changes in the new philosophy of science, Carnap points out, “this new attitude changes not only the thought style (Denkstil) but also the task” of philosophy (Carnap, 1961 [1928], xix). Alexandre Koyré also uses the expression “thought style.” In his 1930 text, “La pensée moderne,” later presented in his book Étude d’histoire de la pensée scientifique, Koyré uses the expression “style” to characterize what he calls the Zeitgeist of modernity or the “style of our time” using, ultimately, the expression “style de pensée” (thought style) itself (Koyré, 1973 [1966], 18).

  11. 11.

    In the North American edition of Fleck’s book, intracollective and intercollective “communication of thought” (Fleck 1935/1979, 108, 119) – see Jarnicki (2016) for reasons why it is better to translate this concept into English as “circulation.”

  12. 12.

    Darwin’s book title On the Origins of Species in German is Die Entstehung der Arten; one can see a similarity with Fleck’s book title in German, Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache.

References

  • Bloor D (1983) Wittgenstein: a social theory of knowledge. Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R (1961) Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Felix Meiner, Hamburg. 1928/1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciesielska M, Jarnicki P (2021) Ludwik Fleck – mikrobiolog i filozof. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen R, Schnelle T (Eds.) (1986) Cognition and fact: materials on Ludwik Fleck. Reidel Publish Company, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Condé ML (2005) Paradigma versus Estilo de Pensamento na História da Ciência. In: Condé ML, Figueiredo B (eds) Ciência, História e Teoria. Belo Horizonte, pp 123–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Condé ML (2018) Mutações no Estilo de Pensamento: Ludwik Fleck e o Modelo Biológico na Historiografia da Ciência. Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea 6(1):155–186. https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v6i1.20236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condé ML (2022) The epistemological foundations of the Zilsel thesis. In: Romizi D, Wulz M, Nemeth E (eds) Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, historian, sociologist, Vienna circle institute yearbook, vol 27. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck L (1979) Genesis and development of a scientific fact. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1935/1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck L (1980) Entstehung und entwicklung einer wissenschftlichen Tatsache. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. 1935/1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck L (1986a) Some specific features of the medical way of thinking. In: Cohen R, Schnelle T (eds) Cognition and fact: materials on Ludwik Fleck. Reidel, Boston. 1929/1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck L (1986b) On the crisis of ‘reality’. In: Cohen R, Schnelle T (eds) Cognition and fact: materials on Ludwik Fleck. Reidel, Boston. 1929/1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf EO (2009) Habent sua fata libelli – le destin des livres. In: Fehr J, Jas N, Löwy I (eds) Penser avec Fleck: investigating a life studying life sciences. Collegium Helveticum, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarnicki P (2016) On the shoulders of Ludwik Fleck? On the bilingual philosophical legacy of Ludwik Fleck and its Polish, German and English translations. The Translator 22(3):271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2015.1126881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarnicki P, Greif H (2022) The ‘Aristotle experience’ revisited: Thomas Kuhn meets Ludwik Fleck on the road to structure. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2020-0160

  • Koyré A (1973) Étude d’histoire de la pensée scientifique. Gallimard, Paris. 1966/1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1962/1970) The structure of scientific revolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1979) Foreword. In: Fleck L, Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (2000) The road since structure. The University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2008) Postface – Transmettre la syphilis. Partager l’objectivité. In: Fleck L (ed) Genese et développement d’un fait scientifique. Edition Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B, Woolgar S (1979/1996) La vie de laboratoire: la production du fait scientifique. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach H (1938) Experience and prediction: an analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer L, Schnelle T (1980) Einleitung. In: Fleck L (ed) Entstehung und entwicklung einer wissenschftlichen Tatsache. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, pp vii–xlix. 1935/1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer L, Schnelle T (eds) (1983) Ludwik Fleck: Erfahrung und Tatsache. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnelle T (1982) Ludwik Fleck - Leben und denken: Zur Entstehung und Entwicklung des soziologischen Denkstils in der Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Hochschul Verlag, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin S, Schaffer S (1985) Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenn TJ (1979) Preface. In: Fleck L (ed) Genesis and development of a scientific fact. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp xiii–xix. 1935/1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner S, Zittel C (eds) (2011) Ludwik Fleck: Denkstile und Tatsachen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauro L. Condé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Condé, M.L., Jarnicki, P. (2023). Ludwik Fleck: Thought Style and Thought Collective in the Historiography of Science. In: Condé, M.L., Salomon, M. (eds) Handbook for the Historiography of Science. Historiographies of Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_5-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_5-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99498-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99498-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Humanities, Soc. Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Ludwik Fleck: Thought Style and Thought Collective in the Historiography of Science
    Published:
    13 July 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_5-2

  2. Original

    Ludwik Fleck: Thought Style and Thought Collective in the Historiography of Science
    Published:
    24 May 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_5-1