Abstract
We present a new classification of technologies and their didactic functions, based on the anthropological theory of the didactic and, in particular, on the media-milieu dialectic. Drawing on this framework, we examine how research on university mathematics education (UME) has focused on different aspects of technology use, while other aspects remain to be considered more closely. We observe, in particular, that a large part of the existing research literature has focused on small-scale experiments with ready-made tools (such as computer algebra systems) and more recently also on the use of online platforms for teaching and disseminating mathematics. Adopting largely the viewpoint of university mathematics teachers, such research explores new possibilities for undergraduate mathematics teaching, taking into account its great heterogeneity of audiences. Research has so far been much less attentive to the institutional forces that drive or inhibit the use of technology in universities, as well as to the changes in mathematical contents which such use often implies, locally (e.g., certain mathematical methods cease to be taught) and more globally (e.g., certain mathematical domains become more or less privileged). Some parts of the research object are intensively investigated, most notably the use of CAS in basic university mathematics teaching, while others – such as programming as a tool for learning and doing mathematics – are only emerging as phenomena to be studied.
References
Anastasakis M, Robinson CL, Lerman S (2017) Links between students’ goals and their choice of educational resources in undergraduate mathematics. Teach Math Appl Int J IMA 36(2):67–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx003
Artigue M (1987) Ingénierie didactique à propos d’équations differentielles. In: Bergeron JC, Herscovics N, Kieran C (eds) Proceedings of the 11th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol 3. PME, pp 236–242. https://www.igpme.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/PME11-1987-Montreal.pdf
Artigue M (2002) Learning of mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. Int J Comput Math Learn 7:245–274
Artigue M (2016) Mathematics education research at university level: achievements and challenges. In: Nardi E, Winsløw C, Hausberger T (eds) Proceedings of the first conference of the international network for didactic research in university mathematics: INDRUM 2016. University of Montpellier and INDRUM, pp 11–27. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/INDRUM2016/public/indrum2016proceedings.pdf
Artigue M, Batanero C, Kent P (2007) Mathematics thinking and learning at post-secondary level. In: Lester FK (ed) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: a project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Information Age Pub, pp 1011–1049
Biehler R, Fischer PR, Hochmuth R, Wassong T (2011) Designing and evaluating blended learning bridging courses in mathematics. In: Pytlak M, Rowland T, Swoboda E (eds) Proceedings of the seventh congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. University of Rzeszów, pp 1971–1980. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02158191/file/CERME7.pdf
Bosch M, Hausberger T, Hochmuth R, Kondratieva M, Winsløw C (2021) External didactic transposition in undergraduate mathematics. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 7(1):140–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00132-7
Boyce S, O’Halloran J (2020) Active learning in computer-based college algebra. PRIMUS 30(4):458–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1608487
Brousseau G (1997) Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Buteau C, Lavicza Z, Jarvis DH, Marshall N (2010a) Issues in integrating CAS in post-secondary education: a literature review. In: Durand-Guerrier V, Soury-Lavergne S, Arzarello F (eds) Proceedings of the sixth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique, pp 1181–1190. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02182374/file/cerme6_proceedings.pdf
Buteau C, Marshall N, Jarvis D, Lavicza Z (2010b) Integrating Computer Algebra Systems in post-secondary mathematics education: preliminary results of a literature review. Int J Technol Math Educ 17(2):57–68. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/107456/
Buteau C, Jarvis DH, Lavicza Z (2014) On the integration of Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) by Canadian mathematicians: results of a national survey. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ 14(1):35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2014.874614
Buteau C, Muller E (2017) Assessment in undergraduate programming-based mathematics courses. Digit Exp Math Educ 3(2):97–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0026-4
Castela C, Romo Vázquez A (2022) Towards an institutional epistemology. In: Biehler R, Gueudet G, Liebendörfer M, Rasmussen C, Winsløw C (eds) Practice-oriented research in tertiary mathematics education. Springer, pp 621–648
Chevallard Y (2019) Introducing the anthropological theory of the didactic: an attempt at a principled approach. Hiroshima J Math Educ 12:71–114. https://www.jasme.jp/hjme/download/05_Yves%20Chevallard.pdf
Chevallard Y, Barquero B, Bosch M, Florensa I, Gascón J, Nicolás P, Ruiz-Munzón N (eds) (2022) Advances in the anthropological theory of the didactic. Birkhäuser. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76791-4
Cline K, Fasteen J, Francis A, Sullivan E, Wendt T (2020) Integrating programming across the undergraduate mathematics curriculum. PRIMUS 30(7):735–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1616637
Dorko A (2020) Red X’s and green checks: a model of how students engage with online homework. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 6(3):446–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00113-w
Dreyfus T, Hillel J (1998) Reconstruction of meanings for function approximation. Int J Comput Math Learn 3(2):93–112. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009783831945
Fleischmann Y, Mai T, Biehler R (2020) Design and evaluation of digital innovations for an attendance-based bridging course in mathematics. In: Hausberger T, Bosch M, Chellougui F (eds) Proceedings of the third conference of the international network for didactic research in university mathematics. University of Carthage and INDRUM, pp 423–432. https://indrum2020.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/INDRUM2020_Proceedings.pdf
Forsythe GE (1959) The role of numerical analysis in an undergraduate program. Am Math Mon 66(8):651–662. https://doi.org/10.2307/2309339
González-Martín AS, Biza I, Florensa I, Gueudet G, Rasmussen C, Thoma A, Viirman O (2022) Introduction to the papers of TWG14: university mathematics education. In: Hodgen J, Geraniou E, Bolondi G, Ferretti F (eds) Proceedings of the twelfth congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12). ERME/Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, pp 2313–2320
Gueudet G (2017) University teachers’ resources systems and documents. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 3(1):198–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0034-1
Gyöngyösi E, Solovej JP, Winsløw C (2011) Using CAS based work to ease the transition from calculus to real analysis. In: Pytlak M, Rowland T, Swoboda E (eds) Proceedings of the seventh congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. University of Rzeszów, pp 2002–2011. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02158191/file/CERME7.pdf
Hausberger T (2016) Comment développer des praxéologies structuralistes en algèbre abstraite ? Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 36(1):97–142. https://revue-rdm.com/2016/comment-developper-des/
Heinrich DC, Hattermann M, Salle A, Schumacher S (2020) Learning collaboratively with digital instructional media: students’ communicational behaviour and its influence on learning outcome. In: Hausberger T, Bosch M, Chellougui F (eds) Proceedings of the third conference of the international network for didactic research in university mathematics. University of Carthage and INDRUM, pp 463–472. https://indrum2020.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/INDRUM2020_Proceedings.pdf
Hogstad AM, Isabwe GMN, Vos P (2016) Engineering students’ use of visualizations to communicate about representations and applications in a technological environment. In: Nardi E, Winsløw C, Hausberger T (eds) Proceedings of the first conference of the international network for didactic research in university mathematics: INDRUM 2016. University of Montpellier and INDRUM, pp 211–220. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/INDRUM2016/public/indrum2016proceedings.pdf
Jarvis DH, Buteau C, Lavicza Z (2014) Computer Algebra System (CAS) usage and sustainability in university mathematics instruction: findings from an international study. Electron J Math Technol 8(4):286–299. https://php.radford.edu/~ejmt/deliveryBoy.php?paper=eJMT_v8n4a4
Kanwal S (2020) Exploring affordances of an online environment: a case-study of electronics engineering undergraduate students’ activity in mathematics. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 6(1):42–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00100-w
Kinnear G, Jones I, Sangwin C, et al. (2021) A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics. Int J Res Undergrad Math Ed. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6
Klein F (2016) Elementary mathematics from a higher standpoint: volume I: arithmetic, algebra, analysis (trans: Schubring G). Springer. (Original work published 1908). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49442-4
Knuth DE (1972) George Forsythe and the development of computer science. Commun ACM 15(8):721–726. https://doi.org/10.1145/361532.361538
Lagrange J-B (2005) Using symbolic calculators to study mathematics: the case of tasks and techniques. In: Guin D, Ruthven K, Trouche L (eds) The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Springer, pp 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23435-7_6
Lagrange J-B, Kiet BA (2016) Une approche fréquentiste des probabilités et statistiques en première année d’Université au Vietnam dans un cursus non mathématique. In: Nardi E, Winsløw C, Hausberger T (eds) Proceedings of the first conference of the international network for didactic research in university mathematics: INDRUM 2016. University of Montpellier and INDRUM, pp 221–230. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/INDRUM2016/public/indrum2016proceedings.pdf
Lavicza Z (2008a) Factors influencing the integration of Computer Algebra Systems into university-level mathematics education. Int J Technol Math Educ 14(3):121–129
Lavicza Z (2008b) The examination of Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) integration into university-level mathematics teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge
Lockwood E, De Chenne A (2020) Enriching students’ combinatorial reasoning through the use of loops and conditional statements in Python. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 6:303–346
Lockwood E, DeJarnette A, Thomas T (2019) Computing as a mathematical disciplinary practice. J Math Behav 54:100688
Madsen LM, Winsløw C (2009) Relations between teaching and research in physical geography and mathematics at research intensive universities. Int J Sci Math Educ 7(4):741–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9134-y
Oates G, Sheryn L, Thomas M (2014) Technology-active student engagement in an undergraduate mathematics course. In: Liljedahl P, Oesterle S, Nicol C, Allan D (eds) Proceedings of the 38th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol 4. PME, pp 329–336. https://www.igpme.org/publications/current-proceedings/
Radmehr F, Goodchild S (2022) Switching to fully online teaching and learning of mathematics: the case of Norwegian mathematics lecturers and university students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Int J Res Undergrad Math Ed 8:581–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00162-9
Robinson M, Loch B, Croft T (2015) Student perceptions of screencast feedback on mathematics assessment. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 1(3):363–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0018-6
Roh KH, Lee YH (2017) Designing tasks of introductory real analysis to bridge a gap between students’ intuition and mathematical rigor: the case of the convergence of a sequence. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 3(1):34–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0039-9
Rønning F (2017) Influence of computer-aided assessment on ways of working with mathematics. Teach Math Appl Int J IMA 36(2):94–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx001
Rosa M, Lerman S (2011) Researching online mathematics education: opening a space for virtual learner identities. Educ Stud Math 78(1):69–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9310-9
Sangwin C, O’Toole C (2017) Computer programming in the UK undergraduate mathematics curriculum. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 48(8):1133–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1315186
Sümmermann ML, Sommerhoff D, Rott B (2021) Mathematics in the digital age: the case of simulation-based proofs. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 7(3):438–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00125-6
Tall D (1996) Function and calculus. In: Bishop AJ, Clements K, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Laborde C (eds) International handbook of mathematics education, vol 4. Springer, pp 289–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_9
Thoma A, Iannone P (2022) Learning about proof with the theorem prover LEAN: the abundant numbers task. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 8(1):64–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00140-1
Thompson PW (2019) Making the fundamental theorem of calculus fundamental to students’ calculus. In: Monaghan J, Nardi E, Dreyfus T (eds) Calculus in upper secondary and beginning university mathematics – conference proceedings. MatRIC, pp 38–65. https://matric-calculus.sciencesconf.org/
Thompson PW, Byerley C, Hatfield N (2013) A conceptual approach to calculus made possible by technology. Comput Sch 30(1–2):124–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.768941
Trenholm S, Peschke J (2020) Teaching undergraduate mathematics fully online: a review from the perspective of communities of practice. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 17(37). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00215-0
Trenholm S, Alcock L, Robinson C (2016) The instructor experience of fully online tertiary mathematics: a challenge and an opportunity. J Res Math Educ 47(2):147–161. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.2.0147
Troup J (2019) Developing reasoning about the derivative of a complex-valued function with the aid of Geometer’s Sketchpad. Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 5(1):3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0081-x
Webel C, Krupa EE, McManus J (2017) The math emporium: effective for whom, and for what? Int J Res Undergrad Math Educ 3(2):355–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0046-x
Winsløw C (2003) Semiotic and discursive variables in CAS-based didactical engineering. Educ Stud Math 52(3):271–288. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024201714126
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Winsløw, C., Bosch, M., González-Martín, A.S., Huo, R. (2023). Technology in University Mathematics Education. In: Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., Choppin, J. (eds) Handbook of Digital Resources in Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95060-6_34-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95060-6_34-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95060-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95060-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education