Abstract
In higher education, the difficulties of implementing teaching sequences in which several academic and engineering disciplines, or even professional worlds, coexist have been widely documented. We hypothesize that these difficulties stem, especially, from a series of conditions and constraints that determine the knowledge life in these different universes. In this chapter, we propose using tools from the Anthropological Theory of Didactics (ATD) to analyze these epistemologies and illustrate their application with examples from land surveying, industrial, and computer science contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a presentation of the concept of praxeology, see the 3rd section of the chapter by González-Martín, Barquero and Gueudet.
- 2.
« une deuxième fonction de la technologie est d’expliquer, de rendre intelligible, d’éclairer la technique. […] Enfin une dernière fonction correspond à un emploi plus actuel du terme de technologie: la production de techniques. » (1999, pp. 226–227).
- 3.
For Anglo-Saxon references, see for example Chapter 1, Part 650- Engineering Field Handbook edited by the Natural Resources Conservation Service of the US Department of Agriculture (2008) https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=25276.wba
- 4.
Unknown author and date. http://www.ce.memphis.edu/1112/notes/project_3/traverse/Surveying_traverse.pdf
- 5.
For a presentation of this pedagogy, see the chapter by González-Martín, Barquero and Gueudet.
- 6.
The Western Electric Company closed in 1985. The book is now almost impossible to find, but a French translation is available online.
- 7.
See Chevallard (1991, p. 214).
- 8.
We rely here on Bettayeb (2012), especially p. 36.
- 9.
For a complete presentation of this problematic, see (Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008).
- 10.
Associating a specific level of confidence requires certain assumptions regarding the probability distribution, characterized by the measurement result and its standard deviation. Normal distribution is often applied as a principle assumption for MS, this explains the shape of the curves in the figures.
- 11.
Measurement device
- 12.
This choice supposes that the enterprise’s metrology laboratory has a good knowledge of the range of variation of a given product.
- 13.
See (Clément, 2017), p. 15.
- 14.
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) sustains these positions. They appear in MSA-2010: Table II-D 1.
- 15.
See (Clément, 2017), p. 10.
- 16.
Patricio-Martinez has worked with a 2012 version of d’Andrea’s paper, which is no longer available. We refer to a 2020 version, similar to the previous one, edited in a review. English translations of the citations are ours.
- 17.
References
1factory. (n.d.). Quality academy: A guide to product quality control. https://www.1factory.com/quality-academy/guide-to-process-capability-analysis-cp-cpk-pp-ppk.html
Aldape-Carillo, J. O. (2016). Estudio antropológico de una práctica de metrología en una empresa automotriz y su potencialidad como base de diseños didácticos [Unpublished master dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero]. CICATA-IPN. https://www.cicata.ipn.mx/assets/files/cicata/ProME/docs/tesis/tesis_maestria/2016/aldape_2016.pdf
Bettayeb, B. (2012). Conception et évaluation des plans de surveillance basés sur le risque. Limitation des incertitudes qualité avec des ressources limitées de maîtrise [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Grenoble]. HAL. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00859830
Borrego, M., & Cutler, S. (2010). Constructive alignment of interdisciplinary graduate curriculum in engineering and science: An analysis of successful IGERT proposals. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01068
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 33, 107–117.
Castela, C. (2016). Cuando las praxeologías viajan de una institución a otra: una aproximación epistemológica del “boundary crossing”. Educación Matemática, 28(2), 8–29. http://www.revista-educacion-matematica.com/descargas/Vol28-2.pdf
Castela, C. (2017). When praxeologies move from an institution to another one: An epistemological approach of boundary crossing. In R. Göller, R. Biehler, R. Hochmuth, & H.-G. Rück (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics in higher education as a scientific discipline – Conference proceedings (pp. 418–425). University of Kassel.
Castela, C. (2020). Les praxéologies comme idiosyncrasies institutionnelles. Educação Matemática Pesquisa: Revista do Programa de Estudos Pós-graduados em Educação Matemática, v.22, n° 4, pp. 86–102. https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2020v22i4p086-102
Castela, C., & Elguero, C. (2013). Praxéologie et institution, concepts clés pour l’anthropologie épistémologique et la socioépistémologie. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 33(2), 79–130.
Castela, C., & Romo, A. (2011). Des mathématiques à l’automatique : étude des effets de transposition sur la transformée de Laplace dans la formation des ingénieurs. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 31(1), 79–130.
Chaachoua, H., Bessot, A., Romo, A., & Castela, C. (2019). Developments and functionalities in the praxeological model. In M. Bosch, Y. Chevallard, F. J. García, & J. Monaghan (Eds.), Working with the anthropological theory of the didactic. A comprehensive casebook (pp. 41–60). Routledge.
Chevallard, Y. (1991). La transposition didactique (Rev. ed.). La Pensée Sauvage.
Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19(2), 221–266.
Chevallard, Y. (2003). Approche anthropologique du rapport au savoir et didactique des mathématiques. In S. Maury & M. Caillot (Eds.), Rapport au savoir et didactiques (pp. 81–104). Editions Fabert.
Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the IV congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 21–30) FUNDEMI-IQS.
Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company and General Motors Corporation. (2010). Manual about measurement systems analysis (4th ed.). https://dastmardi.ir/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/MSA_Reference_Manual_4th_Edition.pdf
Clément, B. (2017). Contrôle Statistique des Processus (CSP), Cartes de Contrôle de Shewhart (CCS) and Statistical Process Control (SPC). https://cours.polymtl.ca/mth6301/mth8302/Clement-Introduction_SPC.pdf
Covián, O. (2013). La formación matemática de futuros profesionales técnicos en construcción [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, IPN-Cinvestav]. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271198372_La_formacion_matematica_de_futuros_profesionales_tecnicos_en_construccion#fullTextFileContent
D’Andrea, C. (2020). El álgebra detrás de los buscadores de internet. Revista de Educacion Matematica, Volumen 35(1), 23–38. http://www.ub.edu/arcades/2012_09_25_escrito_google.pdf
Fernández, P. (2004). El secreto de Google y el Álgebra Lineal. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Matemática Aplicada, 30, 115–141.
Frejd, P., & Bergsten, C. (2016). Mathematical modelling as a professional task. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9654-7
Gainsburg, J. (2007). The mathematical disposition of structural engineers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 477–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034962
Gallagher, S. E., & Savage, T. (2020). Challenge-based learning in higher education: An exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354
González-Martín, A. S., Gueudet, G., Barquero, B., & Romo-Vázquez, A. (2021). Mathematics for engineers, modelling, mathematics and other disciplines. In V. Durand-Guerrier, R. Hochmut, E. Nardi, & C. Winsløw (Eds.), Research and development in university mathematics education (pp. 169–191). Routledge ERME Series: New Perspectives on Research in Mathematics Education.
Hernandez-Martinez, P., Thomas, S., Viirman, O., & Rogovchenko, Y. (2021). ‘I’m still making dots for them’: Mathematics lecturers’ views on their mathematical modelling practices. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1668977
Jao, L., & Radakovic, N. (Eds.). (2018). Transdisciplinarity in mathematics education. Blurring disciplinary boundaries. Springer.
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology – JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data-Guide the expression of uncertainty in measurement. https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html
Kaiser, G. (2020). Mathematical modelling and applications in education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 553–560). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_101
Kent, P., Noss, R., Guile, D., Hoyles, C., & Bakker, A. (2007). Characterizing the use of mathematical knowledge in boundary-crossing situations at work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1–2), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030701307747
Klein, J. (2013). The transdisciplinary moment(um). Integration Review, 9(2), 189–199.
Kolmos, A. (2009). Problem-based and project-based learning. In O. Skovmose, P. Valero, & O. R. Christensen (Eds.), University science and mathematics education in transition (pp. 261–280). Springer.
Loeng, R. (2019). Les fonctions sinus et cosinus dans le secondaire en France et au Cambodge [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Paris]. HAL. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02983421
Minitab 18 Support. (n.d.). Variables charts for subgroups- Overview for Xbar-R Chart. https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/18/help-and-how-to/quality-and-process-improvement/control-charts/how-to/variables-charts-for-subgroups/xbar-r-chart/before-you-start/overview/
Minitab 19 Support. (n.d.). All statistics and graphs for Xbar-R Chart-Tests for special causes. https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/19/help-and-how-to/quality-and-process-improvement/control-charts/how-to/variables-charts-for-subgroups/xbar-r-chart/interpret-the-results/all-statistics-and-graphs/#control-limits
Natural Resources Conservation Service-US Department of Agriculture. (2008). Engineering field handbook, part 650, Chapter 1. https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=25276.wba
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9
Patricio-Martínez, J. (2016). Diseño de Actividades de Estudio e Investigación para una formación de Ingenieros en Sistemas Computacionales: El caso de PageRank [Unpublished Master dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero]. Repository RIUAGRO. http://ri.uagro.mx/handle/uagro/475
Roth, W.-M. (2020). Interdisciplinary approaches in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 317–320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_82
Schmidt, K., & Winsløw, C. (2021). Authentic engineering problems in service mathematics assignments: Principles, processes and products from twenty years of task design. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education., 7, 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00133-0
Siero, L., Romo, A., & Abundez, A. (2017). Methodology for designing didactical activities as an engineering project of a tactile sensorial therapeutic ramp. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth congress of the European mathematical society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1004–1011). DCU Institute of Education and ERME.
Solares-Pineda, D., Solares, A., & Padilla, E. (2016). La enseñanza de las matemáticas más allá de los salones de clase. Análisis de actividades laborales urbanas y rurales. Educación Matemática, 28(1), 69–98.
Takeuchi, M. A., Sengupta, P., Shanahan, M. C., Adams, J. D., & Hachem, M. (2020). Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: A critical review. Studies in Science Education, 56, 213–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1755802
Western electric. (1985). Statistical quality control handbook. (J.-M. Gogue, Trans.). AT & T Technologies/Western Electric. http://www.fr-deming.org/WECSQ.pdf
Wills, R. S. (2006). Google’s PageRank: The math behind the search engine. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 28(4), 6–11.
Winsløw, C., Gueudet, G., Hochmuth, R., & Nardi, E. (2018). Research on university mathematics education. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 60–74). Routledge.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2016). Curriculum and the specialization of knowledge. Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castela, C., Romo-Vázquez, A. (2022). Towards an Institutional Epistemology. In: Biehler, R., Liebendörfer, M., Gueudet, G., Rasmussen, C., Winsløw, C. (eds) Practice-Oriented Research in Tertiary Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14175-1_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14175-1_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14174-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14175-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)