Abstract
Sustainability transition is not new for higher education. Universities around the world have discussed about the topic since the 1970s, publishing series of reports and declarations of intentions. These documents kept calling for transdisciplinary approaches and the implementation of Education for Sustainable Development competences. However, a few decades after, HEIs struggle with the operationalization of an educational vision on sustainable development into the practicality of a faculty program or curricula. This chapter calls the academic community to explore new learning contexts that facilitate moving to higher orders of learning that can sustain the integration sustainability approaches. Moving to deeper levels of learning means the transition from educating about sustainability towards educating for sustainability and the final destination: educating as sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albareda-Tiana S, Gonzalvo-Cirac M (2013) Competencias genéricas en sostenibilidad en la educación superior. Revisión y compilación. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI
Albareda-Tiana S, Vidal-Raméntol S, Fernández-Morilla M (2018) Implementing the sustainable development goals at university level. Int J Sustain High Educ 19(3):473–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2017-0069
Alvarez MG, Rijsdijk L (2017) Value creators: an innovative learning environment to shape the future together and find glocal soulutions to the challenges ahead. J Eur Honor Counc 1(2):1–4
Apostel L, Berger G, Briggs A, Michaud G (eds) (1972) Interdisciplinarity; problems of teaching and research in universities. Interdisciplinarity in Universities. CERI, OECD, Paris
Aznar Minguet P, Martinez-Agut MP, Palacios B, Pinero A, Ull MA (2011) Introducing sustainability into university curricula: an indicator and baseline survey of the views of university teachers at the University of Valencia. Environ Educ Res 17(2):145–166
Barrett P, Davies F, Zhang Y, Barrett L (2017) The holistic impact of classroom spaces on learning in specific subjects. Environ Behav 49(4):425–451
Bass R (2012) Disrupting ourselves: the problem of learning in higher education. Educ Rev 47(2):2
Bennett N, Lemoine GJ (2014) What a difference a word makes: understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Bus Horiz 57(3):311–317
Berliner DC (2008) The effects of high-stakes testing on the US economy, its educators, students, and culture. Conference, February 26. Hacettepe University, Anakara/Turkey
Bernstein JH (2015) Transdisciplinarity: a review of its origins, development, and current issues
Betof, E., Owens, L.M., and Todd, S. (2014). Leaders as teachers action guide: proven approaches for unlocking success in your organization. American Society for Training and Developing.
BIAC (2015) Character qualities for the workplace: BIAC survey. Paris
Blumenfeld PC, Soloway E, Marx RW, Krajcik JS, Guzdial M, Palincsar A (1991) Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educ Psychol 26(3–4):369–398
Boddington A, Boys J (2011) Re-shaping learning – an introduction. In: Boddington A, Boys J (eds) Re-shaping learning: A critical reader. Sense Publishers., Rotterdam, pp xi–xxii
Brandler S, Roman CP (2015) Group work: skills and strategies for effective interventions. Routledge, London
Brief UP (2017) Community-based learning for sustainable development
Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future: the world commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cascio J (2021) A educação e mum mundo cada vez mais caotico. Boletin Tecnico do Senac 47(1):101–105
Cummings S, Regeer BJ, Ho WWS, Zweekhorst MBM (2013) Proposing a fifth generation of knowledge management for development: investigating convergence between knowledge management for development and transdisciplinary research. Knowl Manag Dev J 9(2):10–36. http://journal.km4dev.org/
Das KK, Ara A (2014) Leadership in a VUCA world: A case of Lenovo. Int J Curr Res, 6(4):6410–6419.
Dede C (2009) Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 323(5910):66–69
Education Council (2001) The concrete future objectives of education and training systems, Report from Education Council to the European Council, Brussels 14 February, Nr. 5980/01, pp. 1–16
European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2018) Mission-oriented research and innovation policy: a RISE perspective, Publications Office https://doi.org/10.2777/426921
Fadel C, Bialik M, Trilling B, Schnickel J (2015) A review of four-dimensional education
Feltovich PI, Coulson RL, Peltovich J (1996) Complexity, individually and in groups. CSCL Theor Pract Emerg Paradigm 25:25–44
Følstad A (2008) Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review
Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc, New York
Freire P (1981) Education for critical consciousness. Continuum, New York
Gallagher SE, Savage T (2020) Challenge-based learning in higher education: an exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education:1–23
Garcia Alvarez M (2018) Can character solve our problems? Character qualities and the imagination age. Creat Educ 9(2):152–164
Garcia Alvarez M (2020) Character qualities in educating for sustainability. In: Leal Filho W, Azul A, Brandli L, Özuyar P, Wall T (eds) Quality education. Encyclopaedia of the UN sustainable development goals. Springer, Cham
Gibb A (2002) Creating conductive environments for learning and entrepreneurship. Living with, dealing with, creating and enjoying uncertainty and complexity. Ind High Educ 16(3):135–147
Godoy MF, Ribas Filho D (2021) Facing the BANI world. Int J Nutrol 14(02):e33-333
Gonzalo Muñoz V, Sobrino Callejo MR, Benítez Sastre L, Coronado Marín A (2017) Systematic review of competences in sustainable development in higher education. Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion 73:85–107
Gordon EW, Aber L, Berliner D (2012) Changing paradigms for education. Assessment, Teaching, and Learning 2(2)
Gosselin D, Tindemans B (2016) Thinking futures: strategy at the edge of complexity and uncertainty. Lannoo Meulenhoff-Belgium
Hallinger P, Chatpinyakoop C (2019) A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability 11(8):2401
Harden JRC, Davis MH, Friedman M, R. M. (1999) AMEE guide no. 14: outcome-based education: part 5-from competency to meta-competency: a model for the specification of learning outcomes. Med Teach 21(6):546–552
Helle L, Tynjälä P, Olkinuora E (2006) Project-based learning in post-secondary education–theory, practice and rubber sling shots. High Educ 51(2):287–314
Hilger A, Keil A (2021) Education for sustainable development with transdisciplinary-oriented courses-experiences and recommendations for future collaborations in higher education teaching. Journal of Geography in Higher Education:1–20
Hoinle B, Roose I, Shekhar H (2021) Creating transdisciplinary teaching spaces. Cooperation of universities and non-university partners to design higher education for regional sustainable transition. Sustainability 13(7):3680
IBM (2010) “Capitalizing on complexity”. IBM Global CEO Study
Klein JT, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M (eds) (2001) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhauser, Basel
Kockelmans JJ (1979) Why interdisciplinarity? In: Kockelmans JJ (ed) Interdisciplinarity and higher education. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, pp 123–160
Korsakova TV (2020) Higher education in VUCA-world: new metaphor of university. Eur J Intercult Stud 6(1):93–100
Kubisch S, Parth S, Deisenrieder V, Oberauer K, Stötter J, Keller L (2021) From transdisciplinary research to transdisciplinary education—the role of schools in contributing to community well-being and sustainable development. Sustainability 13:306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010306
Leal Filho W (2020) Living labs for sustainable development: the role of the European school of sustainability sciences and research. In: Leal Filho W et al (eds) Universities as living labs for sustainable development. Springer, Cham, pp 3–9
Leal Filho W, Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra B, Mifsud MC, Pretorius R (2017) Universities as living labs for sustainable development: a global perspective. Springer, Cham
Leal Filho W, Salvia AL, Pretorius RW, Brandli LL, Manolas E, Alves F et al (eds) (2019) Universities as living labs for sustainable development: supporting the implementation of the sustainable development goals. Springer, Cham
Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G (2012) Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci 45(2):123–152
Lozano R, Merrill MY, Sammalisto K, Ceulemans K, Lozano FJ (2017) Connecting competences and pedagogical approaches for sustainable development in higher education: a literature review and framework proposal. Sustainability 9(10):1889
Lozano R, Barreiro-Gen M, Lozano FJ, Sammalisto K (2019) Teaching sustainability in European higher education institutions: assessing the connections between competences and pedagogical approaches. Sustainability 11(6):1602
Mazzucato M (2013) The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs private sector myths. Anthem Press, London. 266 pages, ISBN 9780857282521
Mazzucato M (2018) Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union. European Commission
McNeil J, Borg M (2018) Learning spaces and pedagogy: towards the development of a shared understanding. Innov Educ Teach Int 55(2):228–238
Melaville A, Berg AC, Blank MJ (2006) Community-based learning: engaging students for success and citizenship
Middleton A (2018) Reimagining spaces for learning in higher education. Macmillan International Higher Education
Mills JE, Treagust DF (2003) Engineering education – is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australas J Eng Educ 3(2):2–16
Nichols M, Cator K, Torres M (2016) Challenge based learner user guide. Digital Promise, Redwood City
Niewiadomski R, Anderson D (2020) The rise of artificial intelligence: its impact on labor market and beyond. In: Information Resources Management Association (ed) Natural language processing: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, pp 1298–1313
Nørgård RT, Hilli C (2022) Hyper-hybrid learning spaces in higher education. In: Eyal L, Gil E (eds) Hybrid learning spaces. Springer, Cham, pp 25–41
O’Flaherty J, Liddy M (2018) The impact of development education and education for sustainable development interventions: a synthesis of the research. Environ Educ Res 24(7):1031–1049
Oliver TH (2016) How much biodiversity loss is too much? Science 353(6296):220–221
Orr D (1993) Architecture as pedagogy. Conserv Biol 7(2):226–228
Peters MA, Rizvi F, McCulloch G, Gibbs P, Gorur R, Hong M et al (2020) Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19: an EPAT collective project. Educ Philos Theory:1–44
Petrie, N. (2014). Future Trends in Leadership Development. White paper by Centre for Creative Leadership
Poli R (2013) A note on the difference between complicated and complex social systems. Cadmus
Raghuramapatruni R, Kosuri S (2017) The straits of success in a VUCA world. IOSR J Bus Manag 19:16–22
Rieckmann M (2018) Learning to transform the world: key competencies in education for sustainable development. In: Leicht A, Heiss J, Byun WJ (eds) Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. UNESCO, Paris, pp 39–59
Rio+20 Education Group (2012) The education we need for the world we want. The education we need for the world we want (rio20.net)
Sarkar, A. (2015) We live in a VUCA World: the importance of responsible leadership, 30(3):9–1. Emerald Group Publishing, Development and Learning in Organisations.
Rittel HW, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169
Scharmer CO (2009) Theory U: learning from the future as it emerges. Berrett-Koehler Publishers
SDSN (2020) Accelerating Education for the SDGs in Universities: A guide for universities, colleges, and tertiary and higher education institutions. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN)
Sears DA, Reagin JM (2013) Individual versus collaborative problem solving: divergent outcomes depending on task complexity. Instr Sci 41:1153–1172
Siemens G (2007) Connectivism: creating a learning ecology in distributed environments. In: Hug T (ed) Didactics of microlearning. Concepts, discourses and examples. Waxmann, Munster, pp 53–68
Solís AU (2014) Competencias para la sostenibilidad y competencias en educación para la sostenibilidad en la educación superior. Uni-pluriversidad 14(3):46–58
Steiner G, Laws D (2006) How appropriate are two established concepts from higher education for solving complex real-world problems? A comparison of the Harvard and the ETH case study approach. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(3):322–340
Sterling S (2014) Separate tracks or real synergy? Achieving a closer relationship between education and SD, post-2015. J Educ Sustain Dev 8(2):89–112
Stoltenberg U, Burandt S (2014) Onderwijs voor duurzame ontwikkeling. In: Takeuchi K (ed) Sustainability sciences. Springer Spektrum, Berlijn/Heidelberg, pp 567–594
Talloires Declaration (1990) University leaders for a sustainable future, ULSF 42
Thürer M, Tomašević I, Stevenson M, Qu T, Huisingh D (2018) A systematic review of the literature on integrating sustainability into engineering curricula. J Clean Prod 181:608–617
Tibilisi Conference, UNESCO (1977) Intergovernmental conference on environmental education. Tbilisi, USSR, 14–26 October
Tubbs SL, Schulz E (2006) Exploring a taxonomy of global leadership competencies and meta-competencies. J Am Acad Bus 8:29–34
UIL (2014) Community matters: fulfilling learning potentials for young men and women, UIL policy Brief 4. Hamburg, UIL. Available at: http://bit.ly/2l3KhPF
UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992) Agenda 21Ð action plan for the next century. Rio de Janeiro, UN CED
UN General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html. Accessed 12 June 2022
UNESCO (2015) Thematic indicators to monitor the education 2030 agenda. Technical advisory group proposal. http://www.uis. unesco.org/Education/Documents/43-indicators-to-monitoreducation2030.pdf
United Nations (2004) Millennium development goals: progress report. Place of publication not identified: UN Dept.
Wardak D, Vallis C, Bryant P (2022) # OurPlace2020: blurring boundaries of learning spaces. Postdig Sci Educ 4(1):116–137
Warschauer M (2010) Digital literacy studies: progress and prospects. In: Baynham M, Prinsloo M (eds) The future of literacy studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 123–140
Weber EP, Khademian AM (2008) Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Adm Rev 68(2):334–349
Westerlund M, Leminen S, Habib C (2018) Key constructs and a definition of living labs as innovation platforms. Technol Innov Manag Rev 8(12):51
Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–218
Yarime M, Trencher G, Mino T, Scholz RW, Olsson L, Ness B et al (2012) Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustain Sci 7(1):101–113
Zabalza Beraza MA (2012) Articulación y rediseño curricular: el eterno desafío institucional. REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria 10(3):17–48
Zandvliet D, Broekhuizen A (2017) Spaces for learning: development and validation of the school physical and campus environment survey. Learn Environ Res 20(2):175–187
Zeivots S (2021) Outsiderness and socialisation bump: first year perspectives of international university research students. Asia Pac J Educ 41(2):385–398
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Glossary
- Learning environments
-
Ecologies, which include virtual and physical spatial concepts, designed to facilitate and enhance the learning of students and their development of competences and skills.
- Living labs
-
An open innovation platform of collaboration of public and private partnerships (PPP) which create, prototype, validate, and test new products and values for societies.
- ESD learning methodologies
-
Those learning methods or concepts that have elements to sustain the development of ESD-related competences.
- Transdisciplinarity
-
Integration of methodologies, concepts, and axioms that produces new ways of thinking shifting to new paradigms. A new form of learning which involves collaboration between different actors of society and science in order to meet complex global challenges.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Garcia-Alvarez, M., Rekalde-Rodríguez, I., Gil-Molina, P. (2023). No Transition Without Transformation: Educating Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W., Dinis, M.A.P., Moggi, S., Price, E., Hope, A. (eds) SDGs in the European Region . Implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals – Regional Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91261-1_98-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91261-1_98-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91261-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91261-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences