Abstract
In this chapter, it is proposed that science teachers can foster students’ construction of model-based scientific explanations and argumentations through the intentional use of abductive reasoning. This kind of reasoning could be introduced in the science curriculum as a central “mode of thinking” when discussing the scientific methodology. School scientific argumentation is here understood as an “explanation of a scientific explanation,” where the connection between a natural phenomenon under scrutiny and a theoretical model (semantically conceived) to account for it is made explicit. It is contended that, in many cases of acknowledged relevance for school science, the “ascent” from evidence to model can be characterized as abduction (either in a broad or in a narrow sense). Accordingly, a suggestion is here advanced to teach the specific mechanics of the participation of abductive inferences in explanation and argumentation in (mainly secondary or tertiary) science classes through the use of paradigmatic cases (“epitomes”) taken from the history of science. Along this line, selected excerpts from Charles Darwin's book, On the Origin of Species, (Darwin (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, 1st edn. John Murray, London), are employed as such epitomes for biology classes. Following the proposals of several authors, it is shown how a number of theoretical propositions contained in that book can be reconstructed as the conclusions from pieces of abductive reasoning that in many cases use intermediary analogies. Together with the analysis of the examples, the possible formative value of such “abductive reconstructions” for science education is explicated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2001). A proposal to teach the abductive argumentation pattern through detective novels. In D. Psillos et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on science education research in the knowledge based society (Vol. II, pp. 715–717). Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2003). “La muerte en el Nilo”: Una propuesta para aprender sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia en el aula de ciencias naturales de secundaria [“Death on the Nile”: A proposal to learn the about nature of science in secondary science classrooms]. In A. Adúriz-Bravo, G. A. Perafán, & E. Badillo (Eds.), Actualización en didáctica de las ciencias naturales y las matemáticas (pp. 129–138). Editorial Magisterio.
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2013a). A semantic view of scientific models for science education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1593–1612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9431-7
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2013b). La historia de la ciencia en la enseñanza de la naturaleza de la ciencia: Maria Skłodowska-Curie y la radiactividad [History of science to teach the nature of science: Maria Skłodowska-Curie and radioactivity]. Educació Química, 16, 10–16. https://raco.cat/index.php/EduQ/article/view/313098
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2015). Pensamiento “basado en modelos” en la enseñanza de las ciencias naturales [“Model-based” thinking in science teaching]. Revista del Instituto de Investigaciones en Educación, 6, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.30972/riie.063680
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2016). “Modos de racionalidad” en la historia de la ciencia para la enseñanza de las ciencias [“Modes of rationality” in the history of science for science teaching]. In P. Grapí Vilumara & M. R. Massa Esteve (Eds.), Actes de la XIII Jornada sobre la Història de la Ciència i l’Ensenyament “Antoni Quintana Marí” (pp. 9–15). Institut d’Estudis Catalans. http://publicacions.iec.cat/repository/ActesXIIIJornades.pdf
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2020). Contributions to the nature of science: Scientific investigation as inquiry, modeling, and argumentation. In C. N. El-Hani, M. Pietrocola, E. F. Mortimer, & M. R. Otero (Eds.), Science education research in Latin America (pp. 394–425). Brill/Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409088_017
Adúriz-Bravo, A., & Izquierdo-Aymerich, M. (2009). A research-informed instructional unit to teach the nature of science to pre-service science teachers. Science & Education, 18(9), 1177–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9189-3
Adúriz-Bravo, A., & Sans Pinillos, A. (in press). Science & Education.
Aliseda, A. (2006). Abductive reasoning: Logical investigations into discovery and explanation. Springer.
Andrade, E. (2009). La ontogenia del pensamiento evolutivo [The ontogeny of evolutionary thinking]. Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Auletta, G. (2017). A critical examination of Peirce’s theory of natural inferences. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 73(3/4), 1053–1094. https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2017_73_3_1053
Bird, A. (2018). Thomas Kuhn. In: Zalta, E.N. (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2018 edition), n/p. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/thomas-kuhn/
Blachowicz, J. (1996). Ampliative abduction. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 10(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698599608573535
Blachowicz, J. (1998). Of two minds: The nature of inquiry. State University of New York Press.
Brioschi, M.R. (2019). Does continuity allow for emergence?: An emergentist reading of Peirce’s evolutionary thought. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy [Online], XI(2), n/p. doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1647
Burch, R. (2021). Charles Sanders Peirce. In: Zalta, E.N. (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2021 edition), n/p. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/peirce/
Burnett, D. G. (2009). Savage selection: Analogy and elision in On the origin of species. Endeavour, 33(4), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2009.09.005
Callaway, H. G. (2014). Abduction, competing models and the virtues of hypotheses. In L. Magnani (Ed.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology (pp. 263–280). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37428-9_15
Campanaro, D. (2021). Inference to the best explanation (IBE) and archaeology: Old tool, new model. European Journal of Archaeology, 24(3), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2021.6
Campos, D. G. (2011). On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation. Synthese, 180(3), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9709-3
Clement, J., & Núñez Oviedo, M.C. (2003, March). Abduction and analogy in scientific model construction. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Conference. http://people.umass.edu/~clement/pdf/clement_nunez_paper.pdf
Costa, J. T. (2009). The Darwinian revelation: Tracing the origin and evolution of an idea. BioScience, 59(10), 886–894. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.10.10
Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life (1st ed.). John Murray.
Darwin, C. R. (1872). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 6th British edition. John Murray.
Darwin Correspondence Project. (2020). University of Cambridge. Letter no. 4176. Accessed on 4 Feb 2022. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-4176.xml
Delrieux, C. (2004). Abductive inference in defeasible reasoning: A model for research programmes. Journal of Applied Logic, 2(4), 409–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2004.07.003
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster.
Douven, I. (2021). Abduction. In: Zalta, E.N. (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2021 edition), n/p. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/abduction/
Duarte Calvo, A. (2016). La abducción: Una aproximación dialógica [Abduction: A dialogic approach]. Doctoral dissertation. : Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/35905/1/T36885.pdf
Evans, L. T. (1984). Darwin’s use of the analogy between artificial and natural selection. Journal of the History of Biology, 17(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397504
Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N. (1991). Understanding scientific reasoning (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gildenhuys, P. (2004). Darwin, Herschel, and the role of analogy in Darwin’s Origin. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35(4), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.09.002
González Galli, L., Pérez, G., & Gómez Galindo, A. A. (2020). The self-regulation of teleological thinking in natural selection learning. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 13, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00120-0
Gruber, H. E. (1978). Darwin’s tree of nature and other images of wide scope. In J. Wechsler (Ed.), On aesthetics in science (pp. 121–140). The MIT Press.
Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (2001). Creative work: The case of Charles Darwin. American Psychologist, 56(4), 346–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.346
Habiby, I., Hernani, & Riandi. (2020). Improving students’ NOS understanding through explicit-reflective learning with socio-scientific issues context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806, 012122. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012122
Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371
Haig, B. D. (2008). An abductive perspective on theory construction. Journal of Theory Construction and Testing, 12(1), 7–10.
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge University Press.
Harré, R. (1986). Varieties of realism: A rationale for the natural sciences. Blackwell.
Honenberger, P. (2018). Darwin among the philosophers: Hull and Ruse on Darwin, Herschel, and Whewell. HOPOS: Journal of the International Society for History of Philosophy of Science, 8(2), 278–309. https://doi.org/10.1086/698894
Iranzo, V. (2009). Abduction and inference to the best explanation. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 22(3), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.455
Izquierdo-Aymerich, M., & Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2003). Epistemological foundations of school science. Science & Education, 12(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698205904
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). History and philosophy of science through models: The case of chemical kinetics. Science & Education, 8(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008645714002
Kapitan, T. (1992). Peirce and the autonomy of abductive reasoning. Erkenntnis, 37(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220630
Keegan, R. (1989). How Charles Darwin became a psychologist. In D. B. Wallace & H. E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies (pp. 107–126). Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, P. (1985). Darwin’s achievements. In: Kitcher, P. (2003). In Mendel’s mirror: Philosophical reflections on biology, pp. 45-93. Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kleiner, S. A. (2003). Explanatory coherence and empirical adequacy: The problem of abduction, and the justification of evolutionary models. Biology and Philosophy, 18(4), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025523022460
Konrad, K. (2004). Model generation for natural language interpretation and analysis. Springer.
Laçin-Şimşek, C. (2019). What can stories on history of science give to students?: Thoughts of science teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1217a
Lawson, A. E. (2010). Basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation, and discovery. Science Education, 94(2), 336–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20357
Leite, L., Oldham, E., Afonso, A. S., Viseu, F., Dourado, L., & Martinho, M. H. (Eds.). (2020). Science and mathematics education for 21st century citizens: Challenges and ways forward. Nova Science Publishers.
Lewens, T. (2007a). Adaptation. In D. Hull & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to philosophy of biology (pp. 1–21). Cambridge University Press.
Lewens, T. (2007b). Darwin. Routledge.
Lipton, P. (2000). Inference to the best explanation. In W. H. Newton-Smith (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science (pp. 184–193). Blackwell.
Lloyd, E. (1983). The nature of Darwin’s support for the theory of natural selection. Philosophy of Science, 50(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1086/289093
Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. Springer.
Mayr, E. W. (1998). This is biology: The science of the living world. Harvard University Press.
McGrew, T. (2003). Confirmation, heuristics, and explanatory reasoning. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54(4), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/54.4.553
Morrison, M. (2000). Unifying scientific theories: Physical concepts and mathematical structures. Cambridge University Press.
Newton-Smith, W. (1978). The underdetermination of theory by data. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), Rationality in science (pp. 91–110). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9032-6_8
Niebert, K., Marsch, S., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96(5), 849–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21026
Niinilouto, I. (2018). Truth-seeking by abduction. Springer.
Norton, J. D. (2021). The material theory of induction. BSPS Open/University of Calgary Press.
Nygård Larsson, P., & Jakobsson, A. (2020). Meaning-making in science from the perspective of students’ hybrid language use. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(5), 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09994-z
Oh, P. S. (2019). Features of modeling-based abductive reasoning as a disciplinary practice of inquiry in earth science: Cases of novice students solving a geological problem. Science & Education, 28(6-7), 731–757. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-019-00058-w
Okasha, S. (2002). Philosophy of science: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Paavola, S. (2004). Abduction as a logic and methodology of discovery: The importance of strategies. Foundations of Science, 9(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:foda.0000042843.48932.25
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers. 8 volumes. Harvard University Press.
Pérez, G., Gómez Galindo, A. A., & González Galli, L. (2021). La regulación de los obstáculos epistemológicos en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la evolución. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 39(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2968
Plutynski, A. (2011). Four problems of abduction: A brief history. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/660746
Popper, K. R. (1974). Intellectual autobiography. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 3–184). Open Court.
Pramling, N. (2009). The role of metaphor in Darwin and the implications for teaching evolution. Science Education, 93(3), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20319
Psillos, S. (2002). Simply the best: A case for abduction. In A. C. Kakas & F. Sadri (Eds.), Computational logic: Logic programming and beyond. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 2408, pp. 605–625). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_24
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge University Press.
Recker, D. A. (1987). Causal efficacy: The structure of Darwin’s argument strategy in The origin of species. Philosophy of Science, 54(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/289368
Richards, R. A. (1997). Darwin and the inefficacy of artificial selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 28(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(96)00008-8
Rivadulla, A. (2007). Abductive reasoning, theoretical preduction, and the physical way of dealing fallibly with nature. In O. Pombo & A. Gerner (Eds.), Abduction and the process of scientific discovery (pp. 199–210). Centro de Filosofia das Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa.
Rivadulla, A. (2015). Meta, método y mito en ciencia [Goal, method and myth in science]. Trotta.
Rodrigues da Silva, M. (2017). Paul Thagard e a inferência da melhor explicação [Paul Thagard and the inference to the best explanation]. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 18(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i1p125-134
Rodrigues da Silva, M., & Castilho, D. C. (2015). Inferências eliminativas e o problema das alternativas não concebidas [Eliminative inferences and the problem of unconceived alternatives]. Filosofia Unisinos, 16(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2015.163.04
Ruse, M. (1979). The Darwinian revolution. University of Chicago Press.
Ruse, M. (2008). Charles Darwin. Blackwell.
Samaja, J. (2005). Epistemología y metodología: Elementos para una teoría de la investigación científica [Philosophy of science and methodology: Elements for a theory of scientific research]. 3rd edition, 6th reprint. EUDEBA.
Sans Pinillos, A. (2021). Neglected pragmatism: Discussing abduction to dissolute classical dichotomies. Foundations of Science, open access. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-021-09817-x
Sans Pinillos, A., & Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2021). Un lugar para el razonamiento abductivo en la formación de profesores de ciencias [A place for abductive reasoning in science teacher education]. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis, special issue Memorias del IX Congreso Internacional sobre Formación de Profesores de Ciencias, 1825-1830. https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/15471/10250
Schurz, G. (2008). Patterns of abduction. Synthese, 164, 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9223-4
Sengul, O. (2019). Linking scientific literacy, scientific argumentation, and democratic citizenship. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070421
Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Santini, J., Laubé, S., & Griggs, P. (2008). An epistemological approach to modeling: Cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education, 92(3), 424–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20268
Shelley, C. (1999). Multiple analogies in evolutionary biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 30(2), 143–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(98)00030-2
Stamos, D. N. (2007). Darwin and the nature of species. State University of New York Press.
Stamos, D. N. (2008). Evolution and the big questions: Sex, race, religion, and other matters. Blackwell.
Sterrett, S. (2002). Darwin’s analogy between artificial and natural selection: How does it go? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 33(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(01)00039-5
Thagard, P. (1978). The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. The Journal of Philosophy, 75(2), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025686
Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(3), 435–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00057046
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press.
Thagard, P. (2005). Mind: Introduction to cognitive science (2nd ed.). The MIT Press.
Theunissen, B. (2012). Darwin and his pigeons: The analogy between artificial and natural selection revisited. Journal of the History of Biology, 45(2), 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9310-8
Turner, D. (2000). The functions of fossils: Inference and explanation in functional morphology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31(1), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00043-6
Upmeier zu Belzen, A., Engelschalt, P., & Krüger, D. (2021). Modeling as scientific reasoning: The role of abductive reasoning for modeling competence. Education Sciences, 11(9), 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090495
van Wyhe, J. (Ed.) (2002). The complete work of Charles Darwin online.http://darwin-online.org.uk/
Venville, G., & Treagust, D. (1997). Analogies in biology education: A contentious issue. The American Biology Teacher, 59(5), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450309
Wilner, E. (2006). Darwin’s artificial selection as an experiment. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 37(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.12.002
Wirth, U. (1999). Abductive reasoning in Peirce’s and Davidson’s account of interpretation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXXV(1), 115–127.
Woods, J. H. (2013). Errors of reasoning: Naturalizing the logic of inference. College Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Adúriz-Bravo, A., González Galli, L. (2022). Darwin’s Ideas as Epitomes of Abductive Reasoning in the Teaching of School Scientific Explanation and Argumentation. In: Magnani, L. (eds) Handbook of Abductive Cognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68436-5_50-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68436-5_50-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68436-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68436-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering