Skip to main content

Simply the Best: A Case for Abduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2408))

Abstract

This paper formulates what I think is the basic problem of any attempt to characterise the abstract structure of scientific method, viz., that it has to satisfy two conflicting desiderata: it should be ampliative (content-increasing) and it should confer epistemic warrant on its outcomes. Then, after two extreme solutions to the problem of the method, viz., Enumerative Induction and the Method of Hypothesis, are examined, the paper argues that abduction, suitably understood as Inference to the Best Explanation, offers the best description of scientific method and solves the foregoing problem in the best way: it strikes the best balance between ampliation and epistemic warrant.

This essay is dedicated to Bob Kowalski tor his very generous help and the long time we spent in London discussing about philosophy of science and Artificial Intelligence. His inquisitive mind and sharp criticism made me think harder about the philosophical problems of abduction. Many thanks are due to two anonymous readers for this volume and John Norton for useful comments. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the NORDPLUS Intensive Programme on Inference to the Best Explanation in Iceland. Comments made by Jan Faye, Olav Gjelsvik, Mikael Karlsson and Bengt Hansson were particularly useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aliseda, A.: Seeking Explanations: Abduction in Logic. Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence. ILLC Dissertation Series (1997) Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Menahem, Y.: The Inference to the Best Explanation. Erkenntnis 33 (1990) 319–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonjour, L.: The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. (1985) Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burks A.: ‘Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. Philosophy of Science 13 301–306

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cartwright, N.: How the Laws of Physics Lie. (1983) Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  6. Day, T. & Kincaid, H.: Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in its Place. Synthese 98 (1994) 271–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Douven, I.: Inference to the Best Explanation Made Coherent. Philosophy of Science 66 (Proceedings) (1999) S424–435

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fann, K.T.: Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. (1970) Martinus Nijhoff

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flach, P. & Kakas, A.: Abductive and Inductive Reasoning: Background and Issues. In Flach, P. & Kakas, A. (eds.): Abduction and Induction: Essays on their Relation and Integration. (2000) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flach, P. & Kakas, A. (eds.): Abduction and Induction: Essays on their Relation and Integration. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fodor, G.: The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way. (2000) MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goodman, N.: Fact, Fiction and Forecast. (1954) Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gower, B.: Scientific Method: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. (1998) London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hanson, N.R.: Notes Towards a Logic of Discovery. In Bernstein, R. J. (ed.): Critical Essays on C. S. Peirce. (1965) Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harman, G.: Inference to the Best Explanation. The Philosophical Review 74 (1965) 88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harman, G.: Reasoning and Explanatory Coherence. American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (1979) 151–157

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harman, G.: Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. (1986) Cambridge MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harman, G.: Rationality. In Smith, E. E. & Osherson, D. N. (eds.) An Invitation to Cognitive Science Vol. 3 (Thinking) (1995) Cambridge MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harman, G.: Pragmatism and the Reasons for Belief. In Kulp, C. B. (ed.) Realism/Anti-realism and Epistemology. (1996) New Jersey: Rowan & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harman, G.: Reasoning, Meaning and Mind. (1999) Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hempel, C: Aspects of Scientific Explanation. (1965) New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  22. Josephson, J. et al.: Abductive Inference. (1994) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Josephson, J.: Smart Inductive Generalisations are Abductions. In Flach, P. & Kakas, A. (eds.) Abduction and Induction: Essays on their Relation and Integration. (2000) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  24. Denecker, M & A.C. Kakas.: Abduction in Logic Programming. This volume

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kakas, A.C., Kowalski, R.A., & Toni, F.: Abductive Logic Programming. Journal of Logic and Computation 2 (1992) 719–770

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Kowalski, R. A. & Toni, F.: Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (1996) 275–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kitcher, P.: Explanatory Unification. Philosophy of Science 48 (1981) 251–81

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Konolige, K.: Abductive Theories in Artificial Intelligence. In Brewka, G. (ed.) Principles of Knowledge Representation. (1996) CSLI Publications

    Google Scholar 

  29. Laudan, L.: Damn the Consequences. The Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 6 (1995) 27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lewis, D.: Causal Explanation. In his Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, (1986) Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lipton, P.: Inference to the Best Explanation. (1991) London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lipton, P.: Tracking Track Records. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Suppl. Volume 74 (2000) 179–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lycan, W.: Judgement and Justification. (1988) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lycan, W.: Explanationism, ECHO, and the Connectionist Paradigm. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 12 (1989) 480

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mellor, D. H.: The Warrant of Induction. (1988) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  36. Niiniluoto, I.: Defending Abduction. Philosophy of Science 66 (Proceedings) (1999) S436–S451

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Pereira, L. M.: Philosophical Impingement of Logic Programming. In Gabbay, D. & Woods, J. (eds) Handbook of History and Philosophy of Logic. (2001) Kluwer Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pollock, J.: Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. (1986) New Jersey: Rowan & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pollock, I: Defeasible Reasoning. Cognitive Science 11 (1987) 481–518

    Google Scholar 

  40. Psillos, S.: Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. (1999) London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  41. Psillos, S.: Review of Gower, B: Theories of Scientific Method. Ratio XII (1999) 310–316

    Google Scholar 

  42. Psillos, S.: Abduction: Between Conceptual Richness and Computational Complexity. In Flach, P. & Kakas, A. (eds.) Abduction and Induction: Essays on their Relation and Integration. (2000) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  43. Psillos, S.: Causation and Explanation, (forthcoming) Acumen

    Google Scholar 

  44. Salmon, W.: Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. (1984) Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  45. Salmon, W.: Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. (1989) Minnesota University Press

    Google Scholar 

  46. Thagard, P.: Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice. Journal of Philosophy 75 (1978) 76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Thagard, P.: Peirce on Hypothesis and Abduction. In C. S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress. (1981) Texas University Press

    Google Scholar 

  48. Thagard, P.: Computational Philosophy of Science. (1988) Cambridge MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  49. Thagard, P.: Explanatory Coherence. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 12 (1989) 435–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Thagard, P. & Shelley, C: Abductive Reasoning: Logic, Visual Thinking and Coherence. In Dalla Chiara, M. L. (ed.) Logic and Scientific Methods. (1997) Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  51. van Fraassen, B.C.: The Scientific Image. (1980) Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  52. van Fraassen, B.C.: Laws and Symmetry. (1989) Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Psillos, S. (2002). Simply the Best: A Case for Abduction. In: Kakas, A.C., Sadri, F. (eds) Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2408. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43960-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45632-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics