Skip to main content

Conventions, Business Model, and Entrepreneurship

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbook of Economics and Sociology of Conventions
  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents how convention theory has shed light on the entrepreneurial phenomenon and its artifacts, the business model. The term “business model” appeared and spread with the advent of Internet start-ups. Beyond its systemic meaning (modeling a business to make it intelligible), the term has become part of the register of entrepreneurship, irrespective of whether it concerns for-profit or nonprofit organizations. An organization is taken here to be an arrangement of tangible and intangible resources coordinated into tasks, activities, and processes. Led by an entrepreneur or an entrepreneurial team, the organization gives “body” to the convention. Putting this theory into practice through managerial valuation of the convention theory perspective may serve the design of entrepreneurial projects and their deployment, with the development of tools for entrepreneurs, managers, and their advisors in an engineering approach to research (including the deployment of action research aimed at improving practices). Beyond the issue of competition, these tools may help them grasp the conventions of business function and considerably enrich their strategy. Indeed, the entrepreneurial convention is one of the many forms of interactions that structure the social spheres in which a project evolves, and which are not limited to the mere competitive dimension of a market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amit, Raphael, and Christoph Zott. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal 22 (6–7): 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, Chester. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, Jean M., and Sara L. Rynes. 2010. The construction and contributions of implications for practice: What’s in them and what might they offer? Academy of Management Learning and Education 9 (1): 100–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.1.zqr100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On justification. Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. Choses dites. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruyat, Christian, and Pierre-André Julien. 2001. Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 16 (2): 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00043-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charreaux, Gérard, and Philippe Desbrières. 1998. Gouvernance des entreprises: Valeur partenariale contre valeur actionnariale. Finance Contrôle Stratégie 1 (2): 57–88. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.131.0007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, Henry William, and Richard S. Rosenbloom. 2002. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (3): 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comte-Sponville, André. 1998. Philosophie de la valeur. In Actes des XIVème Journées des IAE, 15–26. Nantes: Presses Académiques de l’Ouest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Andrew, Guido Palazzo, Laura J. Spence, and Dirk Matten. 2014. Contesting the value of “creating shared value”. California Management Review 56 (2): 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembek, Krzysztof, Prakash Singh, and Vikram Bhakoo. 2016. Literature review of shared value. A theoretical concept or a management buzzword? Journal of Business Ethics 137: 1231–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2554-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Bone, Rainer, and Olivier Favereau. 2019. Perspectives of economics of convention on markets, organizations, and law. An introduction. Historical Social Research 44 (1): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.44.2019.1.7-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Bone, Rainer, and Laurent Thévenot. 2010. La sociologie des conventions. La théorie des conventions, élément central des nouvelles sciences sociales françaises. Trivium 5. https://doi.org/10.4000/trivium.3626.

  • Dubosson-Torbay, Magali, Alexander Osterwalder, and Yves Pigneur. 2002. E-business model design, classification and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review 44 (1): 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupréel, Eugène. 1925. Convention et raison. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 32 (3): 283–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. 1989. Convention et common knowledge. Revue Économique 40 (2): 361–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/3502118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, Jean-Pierre, François Eymard-Duvernay, Olivier Favereau, André Orléan, Laurent Thévenot, and Robert Salais. 1989. Introduction. Revue Économique 40 (2): 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eymard-Duvernay, François. 2004. Economie politique de l’entreprise. Paris: Editions La Découverte.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Valorisation – Les pouvoirs de valorisation: L’accroissement de la capacité éthique, sociale et politique des acteurs. In Dictionnaire des conventions: Autour des travaux d’Olivier Favereau, ed. Philippe Batifoulier, Franck Bessis, Ariane Ghirardello, Guillemette de Larquier, and Delphine Remillon, 191–196. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaire du Septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favereau, Olivier. 2019. The economics of convention: From the practice of economics to the economics of practice. Historical Social Research 44 (1): 25–51. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.44.2019.1.25-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favereau, Olivier, and Jean-Michel Saussois. 2016. L’économiste face aux organisations. In Les organisations. État des savoirs, ed. Jean-Michel Saussois, 112–121. Auxerre: Éditions Sciences Humaines. https://doi.org/10.3917/sh.sauss.2016.01.0112.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Edgard R. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, William B. 1995. Aspects of organizational emergence. In Entrepreneurship: Perspectives on theory building, ed. Bull Iwan, Howard Thomas, and Gary Willard, 67–89. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, Pierre-Yves. 1994. Qualité et théorie des conventions. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, Pierre-Yves, and Brittany C. Jones. 2000. Conventions: An interpretation of deep structure in organization. Organization Science 11 (6): 696–708. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.6.696.12530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, Nathalie. 2017. Des valeurs. Une approche sociologique. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koumakhov, Rouslan. 2006. Herbert Simon et l’économie des conventions. In L’économie des conventions, méthodes et résultats, ed. François Eymard-Duvernay, 197–210. Paris: La Découverte.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krémer, Florence, and Thierry Verstraete. 2022. Teaching the alignment of business model components: The use of the movie La La Land. Journal of Business Model 2022: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5278/jbm.v10i2.6663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larquier, Guillemette de, Philippe Abecassis, and Philippe Batifoulier. 2001. La dynamique des conventions en théorie des jeux. In Théorie des conventions, ed. Philipe Batifoulier, 127–159. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecocq, Xavier, Benoît Demil, and Vanessa Warnier. 2006. Le business model, un outil d’analyse stratégique. L’Expansion Management Review 123 (4): 96–109. https://doi.org/10.3917/emr.123.0096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magretta, Joan. 2002. Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review 80 (5): 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munier, Bertrand, and André Orléan. 1993. Rapport sur les liens entre sciences cognitives et sciences économiques et de gestion. In GRID CREA. Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orléan, André. 1994. Analyse économique des conventions. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. The empire of value. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, Alexander, and Yves Pigneur. 2010. Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 2001. Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review 79 (3): 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E., and Mark R. Kramer. 2006. Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84 (12): 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review 89 (1/2): 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1935. Théorie de l’évolution économique. Paris: Librairie Dalloz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, Scott, and S. Venkataraman. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25 (1): 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1952. Comments on the theory of organizations. American Political Science Review 46 (4): 1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Problem forming, problem finding, and problem solving in design. In Design and systems. General applications of methodology, ed. Collen Arne and Wojciech W. Gasparski, vol. 3, 245–257. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, Laurent. 1989. Équilibre et rationalité dans un univers complexe. Revue Économique 40 (2): 147–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/3502113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, Laurent, François Eymard-Duvemay, Olivier Favereau, Andre Orléan, and Robert Salais. 2005. Values, coordination and rationality: The economy of conventions. In The institutional economics of Russia’s transformation, ed. Anton N. Oleinik, 21–44. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351146449.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, Thierry. 2005. Proposal for a theoretical framework for research in entrepreneurship. Lille: Editions de l’ADREG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, Thierry, and Alain Fayolle. 2005. Paradigmes et entrepreneuriat. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat 4 (1): 33–52. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.041.0033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, Thierry, and Estèle Jouison-Laffitte. 2011a. A conventionalist theory of the business model in the context of business creation for understanding organizational impetus. Management International 5 (2): 109–124. https://doi.org/10.7202/1003453ar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. A business model for entrepreneurship. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. (First published, 2009, in French, Brussels: de Boeck).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, Thierry, and Bertrand Saporta. 2006. Création d’entreprise et entrepreneuriat. Lille: Editions de l’ADREG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, Thierry, Gérard Néraudau, and Estèle Jouison. 2018. Lecture conventionnaliste du cas des établissements Thunevin. Revue Internationale PME 31 (1): 93–128. https://doi.org/10.7202/1044690ar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Verstraete .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Verstraete, T. (2023). Conventions, Business Model, and Entrepreneurship. In: Diaz-Bone, R., Larquier, G.d. (eds) Handbook of Economics and Sociology of Conventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52130-1_51-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52130-1_51-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52130-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52130-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Conventions, Business Model, and Entrepreneurship
    Published:
    26 March 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52130-1_51-2

  2. Original

    Conventions, Business Model, and Entrepreneurship
    Published:
    10 February 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52130-1_51-1