Abstract
Antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs) have become a valuable method to knock down protein levels, to block mRNA splicing, and to interfere with miRNA function. MOs are widely used to alter gene expression during development of Xenopus and zebra fish, where they are typically injected into the fertilized egg or blastomeres. Here, we present methods to use electroporation to target delivery of MOs to the central nervous system of Xenopus laevis or Xenopus tropicalis tadpoles. Briefly, MO electroporation is accomplished by injecting MO solution into the brain ventricle and driving the MOs into cells in the brain with current passing between two platinum plate electrodes, positioned on either side of the target brain area. The method is straightforward and uses standard equipment found in many neuroscience labs. A major advantage of electroporation is that it allows spatial and temporal control of MO delivery and therefore knockdown. Co-electroporation of MOs with cell-type specific fluorescent protein expression plasmids allows morphological analysis of cellular phenotypes. Furthermore, co-electroporation of MOs with rescuing plasmids allows assessment of specificity of the knockdown and phenotypic outcome. By combining MO-mediated manipulations with sophisticated assays of neuronal function, such as electrophysiological recording, behavioral assays, or in vivo time-lapse imaging of neuronal development, the functions of specific proteins and miRNAs within the developing nervous system can be elucidated. These methods can be adapted to apply antisense morpholinos to study protein and RNA function in a variety of complex tissues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Robu ME, Larson JD, Nasevicius A, Beiraghi S, Brenner C et al (2007) p53 activation by knockdown technologies. PLoS Genet 3:e78
Hardy S, Legagneux V, Audic Y, Paillard L (2010) Reverse genetics in eukaryotes. Biol Cell 102:561–580
Eisen JS, Smith JC (2008) Controlling morpholino experiments: don’t stop making antisense. Development 135:1735–1743
Summerton JE (2007) Morpholino, siRNA, and S-DNA compared: impact of structure and mechanism of action on off-target effects adn sequence specificity. Curr Top Med Chem 7:651–660
Chen CM, Chiu SL, Shen W, Cline HT (2009) Co-expression of Argonaute2 enhances short hairpin RNA-induced RNA interference in Xenopus CNS neurons in vivo. Front Neurosci 3:63
Lund E, Sheets MD, Imboden SB, Dahlberg JE (2011) Limiting ago protein restricts RNAi and microRNA biogenesis during early development in Xenopus laevis. Genes Dev 25:1121–1131
Draper BW, Morcos PA, Kimmel CB (2001) Inhibition of zebrafish fgf8 pre-mRNA splicing with morpholino oligos: a quantifiable method for gene knockdown. Genesis 30:154–156
Morcos PA (2007) Achieving targeted and quantifiable alteration of mRNA splicing with Morpholino oligos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358:521–527
Kloosterman WP, Lagendijk AK, Ketting RF, Moulton JD, Plasterk RH (2007) Targeted inhibition of miRNA maturation with morpholinos reveals a role for miR-375 in pancreatic islet development. PLoS Biol 5:e203
Choi WY, Giraldez AJ, Schier AF (2007) Target protectors reveal dampening and balancing of Nodal agonist and antagonist by miR-430. Science 318:271–274
Bruno IG, Jin W, Cote GJ (2004) Correction of aberrant FGFR1 alternative RNA splicing through targeting of intronic regulatory elements. Hum Mol Genet 13:2409–2420
Heasman J, Kofron M, Wylie C (2000) Beta-catenin signaling activity dissected in the early Xenopus embryo: a novel antisense approach. Dev Biol 222:124–134
Tandon P, Showell C, Christine K, Conlon FL (2012) Morpholino injection in Xenopus. Methods Mol Biol 843:29–46
S-i O, Mann F, Boy S, Perron M, Harris WA (2002) Lipofection strategy for the study of Xenopus retinal development. Methods 28:411–419
Ando H, Okamoto H (2006) Efficient transfection strategy for the spatiotemporal control of gene expression in zebrafish. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 8:295–303
Sasagawa S, Takabatake T, Takabatake Y, Muramatsu T, Takeshima K (2002) Improved mRNA electroporation method for Xenopus neurula embryos. Genesis 33:81–85
Eide FF, Eisenberg SR, Sanders TA (2000) Electroporation-mediated gene transfer in free-swimming embryonic Xenopus laevis. FEBS Lett 486:29–32
Bestman JE, Ewald RC, Chiu SL, Cline HT (2006) In vivo single-cell electroporation for transfer of DNA and macromolecules. Nat Protoc 1:1267–1272
Falk J, Drinjakovic J, Leung K, Dwivedy A, Regan A et al (2007) Electroporation of cDNA/Morpholinos to targeted areas of embryonic CNS in Xenopus. BMC Dev Biol 7:107
Haas K, Jensen K, Sin WC, Foa L, Cline HT (2002) Targeted electroporation in Xenopus tadpoles in vivo–from single cells to the entire brain. Differentiation 70:148–154
Haas K, Sin W-C, Javaherian A, Li Z, Cline HT (2001) Single-cell electroporation for gene transfer in vivo. Neuron 29:583–591
Javaherian A, Cline HT (2005) Coordinated motor neuron axon growth and neuromuscular synaptogenesis are promoted by CPG15 in vivo. Neuron 45:505–512
Ruthazer ES, Li J, Cline HT (2006) Stabilization of axon branch dynamics by synaptic maturation. J Neurosci 26:3594–3603
Osterele A (2011) P-1000 & P-97 pipette cookbook, 2011. In:Rev G (ed) Sutter Instrument Company
Koster RW, Fraser SE (2001) Tracing transgene expression in living zebrafish embryos. Dev Biol 233:329–346
Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1956) Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin); a systemical and chronological survey of the development from fertilized egg till the end of metamorphosis. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam, p 243
Bedell VM, Westcot SE, Ekker SC (2011) Lessons from morpholino-based screening in zebrafish. Brief Funct Genomics 10:181–188
Kos R, Tucker RP, Hall R, Duong TD, Erickson CA (2003) Methods for introducing morpholinos into the chicken embryo. Dev Dyn 226:470–477
Bestman JE, Lee-Osbourne J, Cline HT (2012) In vivo time-lapse imaging of cell proliferation and differentiation in the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. J Comp Neurol 520:401–433
Sauka-Spengler T, Barembaum M (2008) Gain- and loss-of-function approaches in the chick embryo. Methods Cell Biol 87:237–256
Bestman JE, Cline HT (2008) The RNA binding protein CPEB regulates dendrite morphogenesis and neuronal circuit assembly in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:20494–20499
Chiu S-L, Chen C-M, Cline HT (2008) Insulin receptor signaling regulates synapse number, dendritic plasticity, and circuit function in vivo. Neuron 58:708–719
Shen W, McKeown CR, Demas JA, Cline HT (2011) Inhibition to excitation ratio regulates visual system responses and behavior in vivo. J Neurophysiol 106(5):2285–2302
Sharma P, Cline HT (2010) Visual activity regulates neural progenitor cells in developing Xenopus CNS through musashi1. Neuron 68:442–455
Schwartz N, Schohl A, Ruthazer ES (2011) Activity-dependent transcription of BDNF enhances visual acuity during development. Neuron 70:455–467
Ewald RC, Van Keuren-Jensen KR, Aizenman CD, Cline HT (2008) Roles of NR2A and NR2B in the development of dendritic arbor morphology in vivo. J Neurosci 28:850–861
Zhao Y, Ishibashi S, Amaya E (2012) Reverse genetic studies using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides. Methods Mol Biol 917:143–154
Rana AA, Collart C, Gilchrist MJ, Smith JC (2006) Defining synphenotype groups in Xenopus tropicalis by use of antisense morpholino oligonucleotides. PLoS Genet 2:1751–1772
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Bestman, J.E., Cline, H.T. (2014). Morpholino Studies in Xenopus Brain Development. In: Sprecher, S. (eds) Brain Development. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1082. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-655-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-655-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-654-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-655-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols