Microfluidic technologies enable a relatively new approach to macromolecular crystallization, but offer several significant advantages over more traditional techniques. Microfluidic devices provide significant savings in the amount of material required to complete a set of experiments, although recent innovations with vapor diffusion and microbatch methods have also greatly reduced their material requirements. When compared with these other methods, microfluidic approaches still consume 5–100× less material. In addition, comparisons in one set of experiments suggest that microfluidic free-interface diffusion may also offer substantially higher success rates than sitting drop vapor diffusion. Microfluidic methods also provide opportunities for experimental strategies involving testing multiple samples in parallel. When combined with randomized design of screening reagents, microfluidic devices provide a highly efficient method for sampling crystallization space. Commercial microfluidic crystal lization chips have been in circulation for a number of years now and stable protocols for their use, tips and tricks, and data on their success and failure are now available.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hansen, C. L., Skordalakes, E., Berger, J. M., and Quake, S. R. (2002) A robust and scalable microfluidic metering method that allows protein crystal growth by free interface diffusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16531–16536.
Zheng, B., Roach, L. S., Rustem, F., and Ismagilov, R. F. (2003) Screening of protein crystallization conditions on a microfluidic chip using nanoliter-size droplets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 11170–11171.
Yamada, M., Sasaki, C., Isomura, T., and Seki, M. (2003) Microfluidic reactor array for high-throughput screening of protein crystallization conditions. 7th International Conference on Miniaturized Chemical and Biochemical Analysts Systems October 5–9, 2003, Squaw Valley, CA.
Chao, W.-C., Collins, J., Bachman, M., Lia, G. P., and Lee, A. P. (2004) Droplet arrays in microfluidic channels for combinatorial screening assays. Solid-State Sensor, Actuator and Microsystems Workshop Hilton Head Island, SC, June 6–10, 2004.
Segelke, B. W., Schafer, J., Coleman, M. A., Lekin, T. P., Toppani, D., Skowronek, K. J., Kantardjieff, K. A., and Rupp, B. (2004) Laboratory scale structural genomics. J. Struct. Funct. Genom. 5, 147–157.
D'Arcy, A., Sweeney, A. M., and Haber, A. (2004) Practical aspects of using the microbatch method in screening conditions for protein crystallization. Methods 34, 323–328.
D'Arcy, A., MacSweeney, A., and Habera, A. (2004) Modified microbatch and seeding in protein crystallization experiments. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 11, 24–26.
Luft, J. R., Collins, R. J., Fehrman, N. A., Lauricella, A. M., Veatch, C. K., and DeTitta, G. T. (2003) A deliberate approach to screening for initial crystallization conditions of biological macromolecules. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 170–179.
Stevens, R. C. (2000) High-throughput protein crystallization. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 558–563.
Hansen, C. L., Sommer, M. O. A., and Quake, S. R. (2004) Systematic investigation of protein phase behavior with a microfluidic formulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14431–14436.
Chen, D. L., Gerdts, C. J., and Ismagilov, R. F. (2005) Using microfluidics to observe the effect of mixing on nucleation of protein crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9672–9673.
Segelke, B. W. (2001) Efficiency analysis of screening protocols used in protein crystallization. J. Crystal Growth 232, 553–562.
Derewenda, Z. S., and Vekilov, P. G. (2006) Entropy and surface engineering in protein crystallization. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 116–124.
Rowland, P., Blaney, F. E., Smyth, M. G., Jones, J. J., Leydon, V. R., Oxbrow, A. K., Lewis, C. J., Tennant, M. G., Modi, S., Eggleston, D. S., Chenery, R. J., and Bridges, A. M. (2006) Crystal structure of human cytochrome P450 2D6. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 7614–7622.
Acknowledgments
This work was carried out at the Lawrence Livermore National Lab and was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract W-7405-Eng-48. The authors thank Kevin Farrell and Yong Yi for comments on the manuscript. The authors also thank the TB structural genomics consortium for support for some of the work described.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
May, A.P., Segelke, B.W. (2008). Efficient Macromolecular Crystallization Using Microfluidics and Randomized Design of Screening Reagents. In: Kobe, B., Guss, M., Huber, T. (eds) Structural Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 426. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-058-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-058-8_25
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-809-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-058-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols