Skip to main content

Post-analytical Issues in Hemostasis and Thrombosis Testing

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Hemostasis and Thrombosis

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1646))

Abstract

Analytical concerns within hemostasis and thrombosis testing are continuously decreasing. This is essentially attributable to modern instrumentation, improvements in test performance and reliability, as well as the application of appropriate internal quality control and external quality assurance measures. Pre-analytical issues are also being dealt with in some newer instrumentation, which are able to detect hemolysis, icteria and lipemia, and, in some cases, other issues related to sample collection such as tube under-filling. Post-analytical issues are generally related to appropriate reporting and interpretation of test results, and these are the focus of the current overview, which provides a brief description of these events, as well as guidance for their prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for improved post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays and advise that this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

APCR:

Activated protein C resistance

aCL:

Anticardiolipin antibody (assay)

aPL:

Antiphospholipid antibody

APS:

Antiphospholipid (antibody) syndrome

APTT:

Activated partial thromboplastin time

AT:

Antithrombin

dRVVT:

Dilute Russell viper venom time

FVL:

Factor V Leiden

KCT:

Kaolin clotting time

LA:

Lupus anticoagulant

PC:

Protein C

PS:

Protein S

VKA:

Vitamin K antagonist

VWF:

von Willebrand factor

VWD:

von Willebrand disease

References

  1. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, Adcock DM (2008) Preanalytical and postanalytical variables: the leading causes of diagnostic error in haemostasis? Semin Thromb Hemost 34:612–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Favaloro EJ, Funk (Adcock) DM, Lippi G (2012) Preanalytical variables in coagulation testing associated to diagnostic errors in hemostasis. Lab Med 43:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adcock DM, Favaloro EJ, Lippi G (2016) Critical pre-examination variables in the hemostasis laboratory and their quality indicators. Clin Biochem 49:1315–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lippi G, Guidi GC (2007) Risk management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 45:720–727

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coppola A, Tufano A, Cerbone AM, Di Minno G (2009) Inherited thrombophilia: implications for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Semin Thromb Hemost 35:683–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Favaloro EJ, Bonar R, Duncan E et al (2007) Misidentification of factor inhibitors by diagnostic haemostasis laboratories: recognition of pitfalls and elucidation of strategies. A follow up to a large multicentre evaluation. Pathology 39:504–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonar R, Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S, Pasalic L, Sioufi J, Marsden K (2015) The effect of dabigatran on haemostasis tests: a comprehensive assessment using in-vitro and ex-vivo samples. Pathology 47:355–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G (2015) Laboratory testing in the era of direct or non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants: a practical guide to measuring their activity and avoiding diagnostic errors. Semin Thromb Hemost 41:208–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lippi G, Favaloro EJ (2015) Recent guidelines and recommendations for laboratory assessment of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): is there consensus? Clin Chem Lab Med 53:185–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonar R, Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S, Ahuja M, Pasalic L, Sioufi J, Marsden K (2016) The effect of the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban on haemostasis tests: a comprehensive assessment using in vitro and ex vivo samples. Pathology 48:60–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G (2017) Interference of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in hemostasis assays: high potential for diagnostic false positives and false negatives. Blood Transfus 7:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Favaloro EJ, McDonald D, Lippi G (2009) Laboratory investigation of thrombophilia: the good, the bad and the ugly. Semin Thromb Hemost 35:695–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Favaloro EJ, Orsag I, Bukuya M, McDonald D (2002) A nine-year retrospective assessment of laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance: evolution of a novel approach to thrombophilia investigations. Pathology 34:348–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Favaloro EJ, Facey D, Grispo L (1995) Laboratory assessment of von Willebrand Factor: use of different assays can influence the diagnosis of von Willebrand’s disease, depending on differing sensitivity to sample preparation and differential recognition of high molecular weight VWF forms. Am J Clin Pathol 104:264–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Favaloro EJ, Bonar RA, Mohammed S et al (2016) Type 2M von Willebrand disease—more often misidentified than correctly identified. Haemophilia 22:e145–e155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Favaloro EJ, Bonar RA, Meiring M, Duncan E, Mohammed S, Sioufi J, Marsden K (2014) Evaluating errors in the laboratory identification of von Willebrand disease in the real world. Thromb Res 134:393–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Favaloro EJ (2008) Clinical utility of the PFA-100. Semin Thromb Hemost 34:709–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Favaloro EJ (2017) Clinical utility of closure times using the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA)-100/200. Am J Hematol 92:114–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lippi G, Franchini M, Brocco G, Manzato F (2001) Influence of the ABO blood type on the platelet function analyzer PFA-100. Thromb Haemost 85:369–370

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Favaloro EJ, Wong RCW (2008) Laboratory testing and identification of antiphospholipid antibodies and the antiphospholipid syndrome: a potpourri of problems, a compilation of possible solutions. Semin Thromb Haemost 34:389–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Favaloro EJ, Wong RCW (2014) Antiphospholipid antibody testing for the antiphospholipid syndrome: a synopsis of challenges and recent guidelines. Pathology 46:481–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pengo V, Tripodi A, Reber G, Rand JH, Ortel TL, Galli M, de Groot PG (2009) Official communication of the scientific and standardization committee on lupus anticoagulant/phospholipid-dependent antibodies: update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection. J Thromb Haemost 7:1737–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Plebani M (1999) The clinical importance of laboratory reasoning. Clin Chim Acta 280:35–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lippi G, Franchini M, Targher G, Favaloro EJ (2008) Help me, Doctor! My D-dimer is raised. Ann Med 40:594–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Plebani M (2004) What information on quality specifications should be communicated to clinicians, and how? Clin Chim Acta 346:25–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Plebani M (2009) Interpretative commenting: a tool for improving the laboratory-clinical interface. Clin Chim Acta 404:46–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G (2010) Laboratory reporting of haemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? Clin Chem Lab Med 48:309–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lippi G, Tripodi A, Simundic AM, Favaloro EJ (2015) International survey on d-dimer test reporting: a call for standardization. Semin Thromb Hemost 41:287–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Longstaff C, Adcock D, Olson JD et al (2016) Harmonisation of D-dimer—a call for action. Thromb Res 137:219–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C (2016) Critical laboratory values communication: summary recommendations from available guidelines. Ann Transl Med 4:400

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lippi G, Favaloro EJ (2016) Reflections on the next generation of hemostasis instrumentation. A glimpse into the future? J Lab Med Laboratoriums Medizin. doi:10.1515/labmed-2015-0087

  32. Lippi G, Plebani M, Favaloro EJ (2015) The changing face of hemostasis testing in modern laboratories: consolidation, automation, and beyond. Semin Thromb Hemost 41:294–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel J. Favaloro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Favaloro, E.J., Lippi, G. (2017). Post-analytical Issues in Hemostasis and Thrombosis Testing. In: Favaloro, E., Lippi, G. (eds) Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1646. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7194-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7196-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics