Abstract
The human COMPASS complexes regulate gene expression during development and cell differentiation. Three distinct subunits, KMT2C, KMT2D, and KDM6A (also known as UTX), are frequently mutated in urothelial carcinoma, possibly disrupting the formation of functional COMPASS complexes. Here, we describe methods to evaluate the formation of these large native protein complexes in urothelial carcinoma (UC) cell lines harboring different mutations in KMT2C/D. To this end COMPASS complexes were purified from nuclear extracts by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a Sepharose 6 column. SEC fractions were then separated by 3–8% Tris–acetate gradient polyacrylamide gel and the COMPASS complex subunits KMT2C, UTX, WDR5, and RBBP5 were detected by immunoblotting. In this fashion, the formation of a COMPASS complex could be observed in UC cells with wild-type but not in cells with mutant KMT2C and KMTD.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bannister A, Kouzarides T (2011) Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 21:381–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.22
Miller T, Krogan N, Dover J et al (2001) COMPASS: a complex of proteins associated with a trithorax-related SET domain protein, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 6:12902–12907. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.231473398
Ford D, Dingwall A (2015) The cancer COMPASS: navigating the functions of MLL complexes in cancer. Cancer Genet 208:178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.01.005
Lavery W, Barski A, Wiley S et al (2020) KMT2C/D COMPASS complex-associated diseases [KCDCOM-ADs]: an emerging class of congenital regulopathies. Clin Epigenetics 12:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0802-2
Meeks J, Shilatifard A (2017) Multiple roles for the MLL/COMPASS family in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression and in cancer. Ann Rev Cancer Biol 1:425–446. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-050216-034333
Schulz W, Lang A, Koch J et al (2019) The histone demethylase UTX/KDM6A in cancer: Progress and puzzles. 1:614–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32116
Nickerson M, Witte N, Im K et al (2017) Molecular analysis of urothelial cancer cell lines for modeling tumor biology and drug response. Oncogene 5:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2016.172
Kirkwood K, Ahmad Y, Larance M et al (2013) Characterization of native protein complexes and protein isoform variation using size-fractionation-based quantitative proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 12:3851–3873. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.032367
Bergendahl LT, Gerasimavicius L, Miles J et al (2019) The role of protein complexes in human genetic disease. Protein Sci 28:1400–1411. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3667
Fraser HB, Plotkin JB (2007) Using protein complexes to predict phenotypic effects of gene mutation. Genome Biol. 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r252
Brender JR, Zhang Y (2015) Predicting the effect of mutations on protein-protein binding interactions through structure-based interface profiles 11:e1004494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004494
de Araújo ME, Huber LA (2007) Subcellular fractionation 357:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-214-9:73
Holden P, Horton WA (2009) Crude subcellular fractionation of cultured mammalian cell lines 2:243. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-243
Dimauro I, Pearson T, Caporossi D, et al (2012) A simple protocol for the subcellular fractionation of skeletal muscle cells and tissue 5:513. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-513
Cox B, Emili A (2006) Tissue subcellular fractionation and protein extraction for use in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics 1:1872–1878. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.273
Fossati A, Frommelt F, Uliana F et al (2021) System-wide profiling of protein complexes via size exclusion chromatography-mass spectrometry (SEC-MS) 2259:269–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1178-4_18
Mayer CL, Snyder WK, Swietlicka MA et al (2009) Size-exclusion chromatography can identify faster-associating protein complexes and evaluate design strategies 2:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-135
Ren C, Bailey AO, VanderPorten E et al (2019) Quantitative determination of protein–ligand affinity by size exclusion chromatography directly coupled to high-resolution native mass spectrometry 91:903–911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03829
Walker JM (1984) Gradient SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis 1:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-062-8:57
Cubillos-Rojas M, Amair-Pinedo F (2012) Tato I, et al. Tris-acetate polyacrylamide gradient gels for the simultaneous electrophoretic analysis of proteins of very high and low molecular mass 869:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-821-4_17
Lang A, Yilmaz M, Hader C, et al (2019) Contingencies of UTX/KDM6A action in urothelial carcinoma. 11:481. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11040481
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Wilhelm Sander Foundation (grant 2016.038.2). PW was supported by the DPST scholarship, Thailand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Peter, C., Schulz, W.A., Whongsiri, P. (2023). Characterization of Native COMPASS Complex in Urothelial Carcinoma Cells by Size Exclusion Chromatography. In: Hoffmann, M.J., Gaisa, N.T., Nawroth, R., Ecke, T.H. (eds) Urothelial Carcinoma. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2684. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3291-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3291-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3290-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3291-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols