Abstract
The similarity of biological functions and molecular mechanisms in living organisms suggests their common origin. The inference of evolutionary relationships among the extant organisms is primarily based on structural, functional, and sequence data of biomolecules, such as DNA, RNA, and protein, and their relative changes over the course of time. To decipher evolutionary relationships, a variety of data can be used. The exponential growth of genomic data, spurred by advances in DNA sequencing, has enabled biologists to reconstruct the tree or network of life for a vast number of organisms dwelling in the earth. In addition of organismal relationships, phylogenetic analysis is often performed to characterize gene families, specifically to identify the orthologs and paralogs of a gene of interest and understand their varied functions in light of evolution. In this chapter, we describe a protocol for reconstructing a phylogenetic tree using maximum-likelihood approach. We demonstrate using an example dataset and a suite of publicly available programs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lack D (1983) Darwin's finches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25(17):3389–3402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
Finn RD (2005) Pfam: the protein families database. In: Encyclopedia of genetics, genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.1002/047001153X.g306303
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32(5):1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-MartÃnez JM, Gabaldón T (2009) trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25(15):1972–1973
Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2011) ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 27(8):1164–1165. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr088
Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59(3):307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
Rambaut A (2012). http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
Letunic I, Bork P (2007) Interactive tree of life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23(1):127–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529
Achnine L, Huhman DV, Farag MA, Sumner LW, Blount JW, Dixon RA (2005) Genomics-based selection and functional characterization of triterpene glycosyltransferases from the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J 41(6):875–887
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Sengupta, S., Azad, R.K. (2022). A Protocol for Phylogenetic Reconstruction. In: Shulaev, V. (eds) Plant Metabolic Engineering. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2396. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1822-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1822-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1821-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1822-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols