Abstract
DNA repair is regarded as an important biomarker to be measured alongside DNA damage when considering the risk of cancer from environmental or genetic causes. Efficient repair deals with DNA lesions before they can disrupt replication and create mutations. Repair capacity can be readily assessed using an in vitro comet-based DNA repair assay, which is particularly useful in human biomonitoring studies where many samples are collected over an extended period, stored frozen, and analyzed at a later date. In this assay, a protein lysate is extracted from studied cells or tissues and is incubated with damage-containing substrate DNA. Repair proteins in extract are able to recognize and incise DNA lesions and cumulate DNA breaks, which are quantified with the comet assay. Here we provide detailed protocols for the in vitro estimation of base excision repair (on a substrate containing 8-oxoguanine induced by visible light in the presence of a photosensitizer) and nucleotide excision repair (with UV-induced pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts as substrate). We describe the preparation of extracts from different kinds of source material (cultured cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, animal tissues, human biopsies) and emphasize the need for careful control of the extract concentration. Furthermore, we discuss not only conventional comet assay format (2 gels on microscope slide), but also a medium-throughput version (12 minigels in microscope slide), which is recommended for reduction of experimental variability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Collins AR, Fleming IM, Gedik CM (1994) In vitro repair of oxidative and ultraviolet-induced DNA damage in supercoiled nucleoid DNA by human cell extract. Biochim Biophys Acta 1219(3):724–727
Collins AR, Dusinska M, Horvathova E et al (2001) Inter-individual differences in repair of DNA base oxidation, measured in vitro with the comet assay. Mutagenesis 16(4):297–301
Langie SA, Knaapen AM, Brauers KJ et al (2006) Development and validation of a modified comet assay to phenotypically assess nucleotide excision repair. Mutagenesis 21(2):153–158
Gaivao I, Piasek A, Brevik A et al (2009) Comet assay-based methods for measuring DNA repair in vitro; estimates of inter- and intra-individual variation. Cell Biol Toxicol 25(1):45–52
Langie SA, Cameron KM, Waldron KJ et al (2011) Measuring DNA repair incision activity of mouse tissue extracts towards singlet oxygen-induced DNA damage: a comet-based in vitro repair assay. Mutagenesis 26(3):461–471
Langie SA, Kowalczyk P, Tudek B et al (2010) The effect of oxidative stress on nucleotide-excision repair in colon tissue of newborn piglets. Mutat Res 695(1–2):75–80
Slyskova J, Korenkova V, Collins AR et al (2012) Functional, genetic, and epigenetic aspects of base and nucleotide excision repair in colorectal carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 18(21):5878–5887
Azqueta A, Langie SA, Slyskova J et al (2013) Measurement of DNA base and nucleotide excision repair activities in mammalian cells and tissues using the comet assay: a methodological overview. DNA Repair 12(11):1007–1010
Collins AR, Oscoz AA, Brunborg G et al (2008) The comet assay: topical issues. Mutagenesis 23(3):143–151
Forchhammer L, Johansson C, Loft S et al (2009) Variation in the measurement of DNA damage by comet assay measured by the ECVAG inter-laboratory validation trial. Mutagenesis 25(2):113–123
Langie SA, Wilms LC, Hamalainen S et al (2010) Modulation of nucleotide excision repair in human lymphocytes by genetic and dietary factors. Br J Nutr 103(4):490–501
Godschalk RW, Ersson C, Riso P et al (2013) DNA-repair measurements by use of the modified comet assay: an inter-laboratory comparison within the European Comet Assay Validation Group (ECVAG). Mutat Res 757(1):60–67
Shaposhnikov S, Azqueta A, Henriksson S et al (2010) Twelve-gel slide format optimised for comet assay and fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Toxicol Lett 195(1):31–34
Azqueta A, Gutzkov KB, Priestley CC et al (2013) A comparative performance test of standard, medium- and high-throughput comet assays. Toxicol In Vitro 27(2):768–773
Collins AR, Azqueta A (2012) DNA repair as a biomarker in human biomonitoring studies; further applications of the comet assay. Mutat Res 736(1–2):122–129
Guarnieri S, Loft S, Riso P et al (2008) DNA repair phenotype and dietary antioxidant supplementation. Br J Nutr 99(5):1018–1024
Brevik A, Karlsen A, Azqueta A et al (2011) Both base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair in humans are influenced by nutritional factors. Cell Biochem Funct 29(1):36–42
Collins AR, Harrington V, Drew J et al (2003) Nutritional modulation of DNA repair in a human intervention study. Carcinogenesis 24(3):511–515
Caple F, Williams EA, Spiers A et al (2010) Inter-individual variation in DNA damage and base excision repair in young, healthy non-smokers: effects of dietary supplementation and genotype. Br J Nutr 103(11):1585–1593
Riso P, Martini D, Moller P et al (2010) DNA damage and repair activity after broccoli intake in young healthy smokers. Mutagenesis 25(6):595–602
Slyskova J, Lorenzo Y, Karlsen A et al (2014) Both genetic and dietary factors underlie differences in DNA damage levels and DNA repair capacity. DNA repair 16:66–73
Langie SA, Achterfeldt S, Gorniak JP et al (2013) Maternal folate depletion and high-fat feeding from weaning affects DNA methylation and DNA repair in brain of adult offspring. FASEB J 27(8):3323–3334
Collins AR, Azqueta A, Langie SA (2012) Effects of micronutrients on DNA repair. Eur J Nutr 51(3):261–279
Dusinska M, Collins A, Kazimirova A et al (2004) Genotoxic effects of asbestos in humans. Mutat Res 553(1–2):91–102
Dusinska M, Barancokova M, Kazimirova A et al (2004) Does occupational exposure to mineral fibres cause DNA or chromosome damage? Mutat Res 553(1–2):103–110
Vodicka P, Koskinen M, Stetina R et al (2003) The role of various biomarkers in the evaluation of styrene genotoxicity. Cancer Detect Prev 27(4):275–284
Hanova M, Vodickova L, Vaclavikova R et al (2011) DNA damage, DNA repair rates and mRNA expression levels of cell cycle genes (TP53, p21(CDKN1A), BCL2 and BAX) with respect to occupational exposure to styrene. Carcinogenesis 32(1):74–79
Hanova M, Stetina R, Vodickova L et al (2011) Modulation of DNA repair capacity and mRNA expression levels of XRCC1, hOGG1 and XPC genes in styrene-exposed workers. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 248(3):194–200
Vodicka P, Koskinen M, Naccarati A et al (2006) Styrene metabolism, genotoxicity, and potential carcinogenicity. Drug Metab Rev 38(4):805–853
Slyskova J, Dusinska M, Kuricova M et al (2007) Relationship between the capacity to repair 8-oxoguanine, biomarkers of genotoxicity and individual susceptibility in styrene-exposed workers. Mutat Res 634(1–2):101–111
Vodicka P, Kumar R, Stetina R et al (2004) Markers of individual susceptibility and DNA repair rate in workers exposed to xenobiotics in a tire plant. Environ Mol Mutagen 44(4):283–292
Sliwinski T, Czechowska A, Szemraj J et al (2008) STI571 reduces NER activity in BCR/ABL-expressing cells. Mutat Res 654(2):162–167
Hoeijmakers JH (2001) Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411(6835):366–374
Slyskova J, Naccarati A, Pardini B et al (2012) Differences in nucleotide excision repair capacity between newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls. Mutagenesis 27(2):225–232
Herrera M, Dominguez G, Garcia JM et al (2009) Differences in repair of DNA cross-links between lymphocytes and epithelial tumor cells from colon cancer patients measured in vitro with the comet assay. Clin Cancer Res 15(17):5466–5472
Collins A, Anderson D, Coskun E et al (2012) Launch of the ComNet (comet network) project on the comet assay in human population studies during the International Comet Assay Workshop meeting in Kusadasi, Turkey (September 13–16, 2011). Mutagenesis 27(4):2
Acknowledgments
Ro 19-8022 was kindly provided by Hoffman la Roche. SL was supported by a postdoctoral grant from the AXA Research Fund. AA thanks the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (“Juan de la Cierva” programme, 2009) of the Spanish Government for personal support. IG thanks the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) under the Project PEst-OE/AGR/UI0772/2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Slyskova, J., Langie, S.A.S., Gaivão, I., Collins, A.R., Azqueta, A. (2014). A Standardized Protocol for the In Vitro Comet-Based DNA Repair Assay. In: Sierra, L., Gaivão, I. (eds) Genotoxicity and DNA Repair. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1068-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1068-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1067-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1068-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols