An editorial overview Barbara A. SpellmanThomas A. Busey Emerging Trends in Psychology and Law Research Pages: 141 - 142
What can a perception-memory expert tell a jury? Geoffrey R. Loftus Emerging Trends in Psychology and Law Research Pages: 143 - 148
The nature of expertise in fingerprint examiners Thomas A. BuseyFrancisco J. Parada Emerging Trends in Psychology and Law Research Pages: 155 - 160
The vision in “blind” justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition Itiel E. DrorSimon A. Cole Emerging Trends in Psychology and Law Research Pages: 161 - 167
Credible testimony in and out of court Barbara A. SpellmanElizabeth R. Tenney Emerging Trends in Psychology and Law Research Pages: 168 - 173
The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation Jessica M. SalernoShari Seidman Diamond Emerging Trends in Psychology and Law Research Pages: 174 - 179
What cognitive psychologists should find interesting about tax Claire A. Hill Emerging Trends in Psychology and Law Research Pages: 180 - 185
Property law: A cognitive turn Jeremy A. Blumenthal Emerging Trends in Psychology and Law Research Pages: 186 - 191
Expanding the mind’s workspace: Training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task Jason M. CheinAlexandra B. Morrison Brief Reports Pages: 193 - 199
Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: The contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval Nash UnsworthGregory J. Spillers Brief Reports Pages: 200 - 205
Bias versus bias: Harnessing hindsight to reveal paranormal belief change beyond demand characteristics Michael J. KaneTammy J. CoreR. Reed Hunt Brief Reports Pages: 206 - 212
Causal discounting in the presence of a stronger cue is due to bias Jeffrey P. LauxKelly M. GoedertArthur B. Markman Brief Reports Pages: 213 - 218
Polarity correspondence in comparative number magnitude judgments Rolf ReberPascal WurtzLinn Vathne Lervik Brief Reports Pages: 219 - 223
Category effects on stimulus estimation: Shifting and skewed frequency distributions Sean DuffyJanellen HuttenlocherL. Elizabeth Crawford Brief Reports Pages: 224 - 230
Seeing what they read and hearing what they say: Readers’ representation of the story characters’ world Celia M. KlinApril M. Drumm Brief Reports Pages: 231 - 236
Testing pigeon memory in a change detection task Anthony A. WrightJeffrey S. KatzSarah alwin Brief Reports Pages: 243 - 249
Monitoring same/different discrimination behavior in time and space: Finding differences and anticipatory discrimination behavior Daniel I. BrooksEdward A. Wasserman Brief Reports Pages: 250 - 256
How the presence of persons biases eye movements Jan ZwickelMelissa L.-H. Võ Brief Reports Pages: 257 - 262
Replication is not coincidence: Reply to Iverson, Lee, and Wagenmakers (2009) Bruno LecoutrePeter R. Killeen Notes and Comment Pages: 263 - 269
The random effects prep continues to mispredict the probability of replication Geoffrey J. IversonMichael D. LeeEric-Jan Wagenmakers Notes and Comment Pages: 270 - 272
Erratum to: Temporal expectancy modulates inhibition of return in a discrimination task Gabay S.Henik A. Erratum Pages: 273 - 273