Abstract
Witnesses to crimes and other forensically relevant events sometimes describe memories in which they express confidence that, on the basis of research in perception and memory, may be inappropriately high, given the circumstances of the case. The most effective way of conveying this observation and the reasons for it to a jury is via an expert in perception and memory. In any given case, a mosaic of factors having to do with perception and memory are relevant. I briefly sketch the most common of these factors and categorize them as to the degree to which they may be unambiguously and/or quantitatively applied to a specific case. I discuss one such factor, witness-object distance, in some detail, showing how an expert might describe distance effects on perception and providing examples from actual cases.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artwohl, A. (2003). No recall of weapons discharge. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 2, 41–49.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berkun, M. M., Bialek, H. M., Kern, R. P., & Yagi, K. (1962). Experimental studies of psychological stress in man. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 76(Whole No. 534).
Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Newman, C., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 207–218.
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–409.
Laughery, K. R., Alexander, J. F., & Lane, A. B. (1971). Recognition of human faces: Effects of target exposure time, target position, pose position, and type of photograph. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 477–483.
Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 501–506.
Loftus, E. F. (2003). “Make-believe memories.” American Psychologist, 58, 867–873.
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 585–589.
Loftus, G. R., & Harley, E. M. (2005). Why is it easier to recognize someone close than far away? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 43–65.
Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 7, 3–35.
Penrod, S., & Cutler, B. (1995). Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 1, 817–845.
Quintyn, J. C., Massy, J., Quillard, M., & Brasseur, G. (1999). Effects of low alcohol consumption on visual evoked potential, visual field and contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 77, 23–26.
Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect. Law & Human Behavior, 16, 413–424.
Wells, G. L., & Seelau, E. P. (1995). Eyewitness identification: Psychological research and legal policy on lineups. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 1, 765–791.
Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulation to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative & Neurological Psychology, 18, 459–482.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by NIMH Grant MH41637 to G.R.L.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loftus, G.R. What can a perception-memory expert tell a jury?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17, 143–148 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.143
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.143