Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading Erik D. ReichleTessa WarrenKerry McConnell Theoretical and Review Articles Pages: 1 - 21
Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk Steven E. ClarkRyan D. Godfrey Theoretical and Review Articles Pages: 22 - 42
Inhibitory neighbor priming effects in eye movements during reading Kevin B. PatersonSimon P. LiversedgeColin J. Davis Brief Reports Pages: 43 - 50
Semantic word priming in the absence of eye fixations: Relative contributions of overt and covert attention Manuel G. CalvoM. Dolores Castillo Brief Reports Pages: 51 - 56
The eyes fixate the optimal viewing position of task-irrelevant words Daniel SmilekGrayden J. F. SolmanJonathan S. A. Carriere Brief Reports Pages: 57 - 61
Lexical processing during saccades in text comprehension Kiyomi YatabeMartin J. PickeringScott A. McDonald Brief Reports Pages: 62 - 66
Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition Sophie N. LanthierEvan F. RiskoDerek Besner Brief Reports Pages: 67 - 73
A critical examination of the spectral contrast account of compensation for coarticulation Navin ViswanathanCarol A. FowlerJames S. Magnuson Brief Reports Pages: 74 - 79
Integrating episodic memories and prior knowledge at multiple levels of abstraction Pernille HemmerMark Steyvers Brief Reports Pages: 80 - 87
Surprising feedback improves later memory Lisa K. FazioElizabeth J. Marsh Brief Reports Pages: 88 - 92
Positive moods can eliminate intentional forgetting Karl-Heinz BäumlChristof Kuhbandner Brief Reports Pages: 93 - 98
Assessing the influence of recollection and familiarity in memory for own- versus other-race faces Jessica L. MarconKyle J. SusaChristian A. Meissner Brief Reports Pages: 99 - 103
The effect of fearful faces on the attentional blink is task dependent Timo SteinJan ZwickelWerner X. Schneider Brief Reports Pages: 104 - 109
Localized attentional interference reflects competition for reentrant processing Kelly S. Steelman-AllenJason S. McCarleyJeffrey R. W. Mounts Brief Reports Pages: 110 - 115
No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search Johan Hulleman Brief Reports Pages: 116 - 120
Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: A direct comparison of two competing accounts Eddy J. DavelaarJennifer Stevens Brief Reports Pages: 121 - 126
How to keep attention from straying: Get engaged! Charles L. FolkEdward F. EsterKristof Troemel Brief Reports Pages: 127 - 132
Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory Brian A. GoolsbyKimron L. ShapiroJane E. Raymond Brief Reports Pages: 133 - 138
What causes auditory distraction? William J. MackenFiona G. PhelpsDylan M. Jones Brief Reports Pages: 139 - 144
Operant generalization of auditory tempo in quail neonates Susan M. SchneiderRobert Lickliter Brief Reports Pages: 145 - 149
Object permanence in dogs: Invisible displacement in a rotation task Holly C. MillerCassie D. GipsonThomas R. Zentall Brief Reports Pages: 150 - 155
“100% of anything looks good”: The appeal of one hundred percent Meng LiGretchen B. Chapman Brief Reports Pages: 156 - 162
Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary Rocio Garcia-RetameroMandeep K. Dhami Brief Reports Pages: 163 - 169
Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise Natalie SebanzMaggie Shiffrar Brief Reports Pages: 170 - 175
Individual differences in using geometric and featural cues to maintain spatial orientation: Cue quantity and cue ambiguity are more important than cue type Jonathan W. KellyTimothy P. McNamaraJohn J. Rieser Brief Reports Pages: 176 - 181
The effect of marker size on the perception of an empty interval Fuminori OnoShigeru Kitazawa Brief Reports Pages: 182 - 189
Comparing time-accuracy curves: Beyond goodness-of-fit measures Charles C. LiuPhilip L. Smith Notes and Comment Pages: 190 - 203
The disutility of the hard-easy effect in choice confidence Edgar C. Merkle Notes and Comment Pages: 204 - 213
The attentional blink: Increasing target salience provides no evidence for resource depletion. A commentary on Dux, Asplund, and Marois (2008) Christian N. L. OliversThomas M. SpalekVincent Di Lollo Notes and Comment Pages: 214 - 218
Both exogenous and endogenous target salience manipulations support resource depletion accounts of the attentional blink: A reply to Olivers, Spalek, Kawahara, and Di Lollo (2009) Paul E. DuxChristopher L. AsplundRené Marois OriginalPaper Pages: 219 - 224