Training police for procedural justice Wesley G. SkoganMaarten Van CraenCari Hennessy OriginalPaper 17 December 2014 Pages: 319 - 334
Measuring procedural justice and legitimacy at the local level: the police–community interaction survey Dennis P. RosenbaumDaniel S. LawrenceChad Posick OriginalPaper 26 February 2015 Pages: 335 - 366
The Dallas patrol management experiment: can AVL technologies be used to harness unallocated patrol time for crime prevention? David WeisburdElizabeth R. GroffRupert F. Emison OriginalPaper 20 June 2015 Pages: 367 - 391
Citizens’ reactions to hot spots policing: impacts on perceptions of crime, disorder, safety and police Jerry H. RatcliffeElizabeth R. GroffCory P. Haberman OriginalPaper 19 April 2015 Pages: 393 - 417
Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland Sarah MacQueenBen Bradford OriginalPaper 27 June 2015 Pages: 419 - 443
The impact of on-officer video cameras on police–citizen contacts: findings from a controlled experiment in Mesa, AZ Justin T. ReadyJacob T. N. Young OriginalPaper 14 June 2015 Pages: 445 - 458
Introducing EMMIE: an evidence rating scale to encourage mixed-method crime prevention synthesis reviews Shane D. JohnsonNick TilleyKate J. Bowers OriginalPaper Open access 01 July 2015 Pages: 459 - 473
General stress response, not the TASER: reply to “Examining the effects of the TASER on cognitive functioning: findings from a pilot study with police recruits” D. DawesJ. Ho Letter 10 April 2015 Pages: 475 - 477