Background

The retinoid isomerohydrolase RPE65 has received considerable attention worldwide since a successful clinical gene therapy was approved in 2017 as the first treatment for vision loss associated with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal disease (IRD) (https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm589467.htm). Identifying patients with RPE65 mutations is a prerequisite to assessing the patients’ eligibility in receiving RPE65-targeted gene therapies, and it is necessary to identify individuals who are most likely to benefit from gene therapies.

To date, nearly 200 disease-causing mutations in the RPE65 gene have been reported (Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD); professional version 2019.2), which are associated with a large heterogeneous group of retinal dystrophies, including Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) type 2, early onset severe retinal dystrophy, retinitis pigmentosa (RP) type 20 and fundus albipunctatus (FAP). Studies have shown that the mutation frequency and phenotypic variation of RPE65 varies notably between different ethnic groups. For example, RPE65 mutations are thought to affect approximately 1000 to 3000 people in the United States (Population clock. 2018. Available: https://www.census.gov/popclock/ [Accessed 14 Aug 2018]), while 6% of all LCA cases in Caucasians [1], 16% in the Danish LCA cohort [2], and only a few LCA cases were reported in Chinese populations [3, 4]. Generally, most studies associated with RPE65 mutations were performed in Western populations [2, 5, 6], and the exact frequency of RPE65 mutations in all forms of IRD and the variety of associated phenotypes in China has not been determined.

In the current study, we performed a comprehensive mutation analysis in 1434 IRD patients. Twenty patients with RPE65 mutations were identified, and their specific clinical phenotypes were presented. Moreover, we further reviewed the varied phenotypes and genotypes of all cases of RPE65 mutations of Chinese origin reported in the literature. These results provide a brief overview of the frequency and phenotypic characteristics of the RPE65 mutation in the Chinese population.

Methods

Subjects, ethics statement and NGS analysis

A total of 1434 Chinese patients with IRDs and their available family members (total participants: 3576) were recruited from the eye genetic disease clinic of the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University between January 2017 and June 2019. Of these, 956 patients had been mentioned in our previous report [Gao and others 2019]. Written informed consent in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki was obtained from all participants or their guardians. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University. DNA was isolated from peripheral blood using the FlexiGene DNA Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. NGS analysis and bioinformatics analysis were performed as previously reported [7]. We designed a high-throughput targeted enrichment approach to exon-capture regions of 586 genes that are involved in common inherited eye diseases. The probe length of the panel is 90 nt, the total target area obtained is 2.3 M. On average, the mean coverage depth was more than 400X, and the coverage of target region was ~ 99.9% using BGISEQ-2000. Then the sequence data obtained were analyzed as previously reported [7]. Previous reported variants were determined using Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD, professional version 2019.2). For variants that passed the initial filtration, Sanger sequencing was carried out for segregation analysis and variants validation.

Clinical evaluations

All patients with pathogenic mutations in RPE65 underwent a full ophthalmic examination, including best Snellen corrected visual acuity testing (BCVA, they were converted to equivalent value of logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) unit), slit lamp biomicroscopy, tonometry, fundus examination, wide-field fundus imaging (Optos PLC, Dunfermline, United Kingdom), swept-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, Spectralis HRA + OCT, Heidelberg, Engineering Inc., Heidelberg, Germany), visual field (Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, Carl Zeiss Inc., CA, USA), and full-field electroretinography (ERG, according to the standards of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision; available at www.iscev.org).

Results

Genetic analyses

Of the 1434 patients with IRD, 74.55% of patients (n = 1069) received a genetic diagnosis, and a total of 1516 variants involved 87 genes were identified. Only 41 alleles representing 26 distinct variants in 17 families (20 patients: 10 males, 10 females) were identified in the RPE65 gene (NM_000329.2, Table 1 and Additional file 5: Table S1), accounting for 2.83% of all the variants, and the gene was ranked as the seventh most common gene detected in this cohort of patients with IRD (Additional file 1: Figure S1A and S1B). However, the number of patients with RPE65 mutations only accounted for 1.87% (20/1069) of all patients with genetic diagnoses and was the 14th most common among all the patients (Additional file 1: Fig. 1c, d). Pedigrees and mutations of the 17 families are available in Additional file 2: Figure S2. Of the 26 distinct variants identified in this study, 10 (c.1039C>T p.Arg347Cys, c.1255C>T p.Pro419Ser, c.1444G>A p.Asp482Asn, c.334T>A p.Cys112Ser, c.354-2A>G, c.376del p.Val126*fs1, c.806_809delinsTGGAGCCATGAAG p.SerLeu269MetGluProTer, c.837del p.Phe279Leufs46, c.886del p.Arg296*fs1, c.94+2T>A) were novel (Additional file 3: Figure S3), including seven likely pathogenic variants and three missense variants of uncertain significance (p.Pro419Ser, p.Cys112Ser and p.Arg347Cys), which are localized in highly conserved residues (Additional file 4: Figure S4A). Bioinformatics analysis results of the novel variants are shown in Additional file 6: Table S2. Of the 16 variants reported previously, p.His68Tyr and c.998+1G>A were firstly reported to be associated with LCA.

Table 1 RPE65 variants identified in this cohort of patients
Fig. 1
figure 1

a Distribution of different types of variants in the RPE65 identified in this study and reported in the Chinese population. b Distribution of the RPE65 mutations reported in the Chinese population. The number of mutations located in different exons is marked in black font, and those in introns are marked in red font. c Distribution of different types of variants in the RPE65 identified in LCA, RP, and FAP patients reported in the Chinese population. d. RPE65 variants associated with LCA, RP and FAP. A total of 39 variants have been reported to be associated with LCA, 23 with RP, and 8 with FAP. p.Pro467Ala was associated with LCA, RP and FAP, p.Arg44Gln was associated with both LCA and FAP, six variants were associated with both RP and LCA, and three variants were associated with both RP and FAP. LCA: leber congenital amaurosis; RP: retinitis pigmentosa; FAP: fundus albipunctatus

To date, a total of 39 patients from 27 unrelated Chinese families have been reported with pathogenic mutations in RPE65 (Additional file 5: Table S1). Together with the 20 patients (two have been previously reported: F4-1 and F5-1) in this study [8], 57 patients of Chinese origin were diagnosed. Of the 115 variants identified in these patients, the majority of pathogenic defects (71.3%, n = 82) were missense variants, and 28.7% (n = 33) were nonsense, frameshift, or splice-site mutations that severely affected protein function (Fig. 1a). Variants were distributed from exon 2 to exon 14 (Fig. 1b).

Phenotypic characterization

Of the 20 patients in the 17 families, four were diagnosed with RP, one with FAP, and 15 with LCA (Table 2). The mean age at visit was 16.4 ± 12.59 years (range 3–49 years; median, 10 years). All accepted patients (LCA and RP) experienced poor vision at an early age. The mean BCVA with LCA patients was 0.82 ± 0.92 (range 3.00–0.40) LogMAR, and 90% (27/30) of eyes had a BCVA worse than 0.52 LogMAR. Of patients younger than 15 years, the mean BCVA was 0.68 ± 0.92 (range 1.30–0.40) LogMAR, while for patients older than 20 years, the mean BCVA was worse (p < 0.001, mean 1.30 ± 1.30 (range 3.00–1.00) LogMAR. Of the four patients with RP, the mean BCVA was 0.37 ± 1.05 (range 0.52–0.22) LogMAR, while the FAP patient maintained better vision (0/0.05 LogMAR). Bone spicule-like pigment deposits (BSLPs) were observed in six patients from five families (30%, 6/20, Fig. 2a), and no typical deposits were seen in 70% of patients (n = 14, Fig. 2b). Interestingly, we observed that subjects with BSLP were older than those without BSLP (p < 0.05, 26.83 ± 14.86 vs. 11.93 ± 8.65 years, respectively) (Fig. 2d). Eight patients (40%, mean age 9.0 ± 3.74 years) showed white-yellow dots (WYD) scattered in the periphery of the retina (n = 5) or perimacular area (n = 3, Fig. 2c); they were younger than those (n = 12, mean age 21.33 ± 14.09 years) without WYD (p < 0.01) and younger than patients with BSLP (p < 0.05, Fig. 2d). Cone and rod responses on ERG were nonrecordable in 14 of the 15 LCA patients and notably attenuated in the four RP patients.

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of the 20 patients identified in this study
Fig. 2
figure 2

a Color fundus photographs and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) of patients showed bone spicule-like pigment deposits (BSLP). The image in the upper right is the corresponding enlarged figure showing BSLP in the fundus (black arrow). b Color fundus photograph and SD-OCT of patients without BDLP or white-yellow dots (WYD). The image in the upper right is the corresponding enlarged figure showing pigment dispersion in the mid-periphery. c Color fundus photograph and SD-OCT of patients with WYD (black arrow). The image in the upper right is the corresponding enlarged figure showing WYD scattered in the periphery of the retina. d Number of patients (black font) and their corresponding mean ages (blue font) in different groups. Group 1: patients with WYD. Group 2: patients without WYD. Group 3: patients with BDLP. Group 4: patients without BDLP. Group 5: patients without WYD and BDLP. Group 6: patients with WYD and BDLP. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01

Genotype–phenotype correlations

All RPE65 variants identified in the Chinese population are shown in Fig. 3 and Additional file 5: Table S1. To date, 39 variants have been reported to be associated with LCA, 21 with RP, and 8 with FAP. As no clinical features of the FAP patient with one frameshift were provided by Guoxing Yang et al. [9], the FAP diagnosis requires further confirmation, and this patient was not included in the statistical analysis. Of all the variants associated with LCA (n = 73), 71.2% (n = 52) were missense variants, and 28.8% (n = 21) were nonsense (n = 5), frameshift (n = 9), or splice-site mutations (n = 7) that severely affected protein function, while in the FAP group (n = 16), 93.75% (n = 15) variants were missense, and only one splice-site mutation was identified (Fig. 1c). In the RP group, 58.3% (n = 14) of variants were missense variants, 20.8% (n = 5) were truncating stops, and 20.8% were frameshift (n = 2) or splicing defects (n = 3). Therefore, of all the variants (n = 97) associated with LCA and RP, which have a severe early-onset clinical presentation, only 68% (n = 66) were missense mutations, and the remaining 32% (n = 31) of variants were truncating mutations. Nevertheless, in the FAP group, which showed relatively mild symptoms, 93.8% (n = 15) of all the variants were missense. Of all the LCA and RP patients, 50% had missense + missense mutations, 35.4% had missense + nonsense/frameshift/splice-site mutations, and 14.6% did not have any missense mutations. However, of the eight FAP patients, 7 were missense + missense, and only one was a missense + splice-site mutation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Overview of RPE65 mutations reported to date in the Chinese population and this study. Blank: missense mutation. Blue: splicing mutation. Red: frameshift mutation. Green: nonsense mutation. Variants in the black box are mutations associated with LCA. Variants in the blue box are mutations associated with RP. Variants in the green box are mutations associated with FAP. LCA: leber congenital amaurosis; RP: retinitis pigmentosa; FAP: fundus albipunctatus

Only one variant, c.1399C>G (p. Pro467Ala), was associated with LCA, RP and FAP (Fig. 1d). This mutation was located in a highly evolutionarily conserved region (Additional file 4: Figure S4A) and altered the corresponding amino acid from proline to alanine. The 3D structural model of these amino changes is portrayed in Additional file 4: Figure S4B. Of the eight FAP patients, five had the p. Pro467Ala mutation, and the other three had the p.Arg515Trp mutation. It is likely that the two variants were hotspots of FAP. c.131G>A p.Arg44Gln was associated with both LCA and FAP; when the second mutated allele is a truncating mutation (c.858 + 1del), the patients were likely to present an LCA diagnosis, while if the second mutated allele is a missense mutation (p.Arg515Trp), the patients were likely to present an FAP diagnosis. p.Arg515Trp, p.Ala145Asp and p.Ala214Serfs*20 were associated with both RP and FAP, while p.Ala434Glu, p.Ser238Cys, c.94+2T>A, and p. Leu328Phe were only associated with FAP (Fig. 1d). Further analysis of the relationship between BCVA and fundus changes with specific mutations revealed that there was no correlation between them. Different individuals, even those with the same mutation, were found to show different changes. For example, patient F6-2 showed white-yellow dots scattered in the periphery of the retina, while patient F6-1, who had the same mutations, did not display these dots. However, we can't rule out the possibility that these dots would disappear with age.

Discussion

RPE65 mutation-associated IRD usually occurs at an early age, and the majority of patients become fully blind in childhood or adulthood [10, 11]. Recent research has indicated that certain forms of RPE65-mediated IRDs are amenable to gene therapy. Achieving an in-depth understanding of RPE65 mutations and related phenotypic characteristics in the Chinese population is a prerequisite for developing RPE65-targeted gene therapies in China.

Only 20 patients with associated RPE65 mutations were identified from January 2017 to June 2019 in our hospital, accounting for 1.87% of all IRD patients and making RPE65 mutations the 14th most common among all patients. Together with other patients who have been reported, only 57 patients with RPE65 mutations have been identified in China [3, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. These results suggest that RPE65 mutations are rare in Chinese populations. As these mutations appear to be a low-probability, high-cost event, our data may provide strong clinical-based evidence for gene therapy researchers, economists, government policy makers, and ophthalmologists to make decisions in their corresponding work. The mean age of patients with RPE65 mutations was 16.4 ± 12.59 years (median, 10 years), and the mean BCVA was 0.82 ± 0.92 LogMAR with LCA patients and 0.37 ± 1.05 LogMAR with RP patients. Of patients younger than 15 years, the mean BCVA was 0.68 ± 0.92 LogMAR, while for patients older than 20 years, the mean BCVA was worse (mean 1.3 ± 1.3 LogMAR). These data indicate that the optimal intervention window for subretinal gene therapy is within the first 2 decades of life.

El Matri, L. et al. reported that white dot deposits occurred in earlier stages, and clumped pigment occurred in later stages, in patients with RPE65 mutations [12]. A similar result was obtained in the current study: patients with RPE65 mutations are more likely to exhibit WYD in the first decade but show BSLP after the second decade of life. However, some patients (40%) could not have BSLP or WYD, and these changes had no correlation with specific mutations or types or locations of mutations.

To date, genotype–phenotype correlations of patients with RPE65 mutations have not been highly distinct. It has not been determined why some mutations in RPE65 lead to LCA, while others lead to RP or FAP. In addition, the fact that most patients are compound heterozygotes hinders efforts to assess the effect of each mutation on the phenotypes and to evaluate possible allelic hierarchy. In this study, we found four notable cases of possible discordancy between clinical and molecular diagnosis. First, truncating variants seem to lead to a more severe clinical presentation (LCA or RP), while almost all FAP patients were caused by missense mutations. Second, two hotspots (p.Pro467Ala and p.Arg515Trp) associated with FAP were identified, helping to further elucidate the mutational spectrum of RPE65 in the Chinese population. Third, p.Pro467Ala was associated with LCA, RP and FAP, suggesting that this mutation may have a mild effect on protein function, and the phenotype is primarily affected by the second allele. Fourth, BCVA and fundus changes did not correlate with specific RPE65 variants or mutation types.

Conclusions

In the current study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the phenotypes and genotypes of the 20 patients with RPE65 mutations identified in this study and all the RPE65 mutation cases of Chinese origin reported in the literature. Our data provide a brief overview of the frequency and phenotypic characteristics of RPE65 mutations in the Chinese population, help to characterize RPE65 mutations in China, and represent a possible reference for genetic counseling and the selection of eligible patients for gene augmentation.